Today I got a copy of Ultra Dance 11, and the first thing I noticed was the scantily-clad woman on the cover. I admit that I have no idea who that woman is, or whether she's one of the artists or not. I'm not saying that the CD is bad, it's an excellent compilation of the past year's dance/pop hits.
However, there are many more faceless artists and producers that actually produce the tracks in the compilation. Instead of putting just one scantily clad woman on the cover, why not put pictures of several of the artists and producers. They're selling dance music, not porn. The thing that should stand out is what songs are on the CD, not a provocative picture on the cover.
This is just yet another reason why the public is confused about dance music. The average person thinks David Guetta is a singer, not a producer.
However, there are many more faceless artists and producers that actually produce the tracks in the compilation. Instead of putting just one scantily clad woman on the cover, why not put pictures of several of the artists and producers. They're selling dance music, not porn. The thing that should stand out is what songs are on the CD, not a provocative picture on the cover.
This is just yet another reason why the public is confused about dance music. The average person thinks David Guetta is a singer, not a producer.