It probably costs/would cost the corporate group more money to do so and the return wouldn't be enough.If an independent operator can monetize older demos, then a Corporate group should be able to. They have decided it's not worth it...
It probably costs/would cost the corporate group more money to do so and the return wouldn't be enough.If an independent operator can monetize older demos, then a Corporate group should be able to. They have decided it's not worth it...
I said that for most s rations there is no money in programming to an older audience. But as has been shown by WECK there are enough local accounts and smaller local independent agencies that it can be very profitable . But the big group operators have a different business model which, for several reasons, does not allow for that kind of “special interest” audience to be served.That is contrary to the mantra you preach about "It's too expensive and not worth trying to reach older demos with ads", It's too hard to get a sale, they don't respond to ads, etc.."
Most of us are.It's true that quite a few folks between 65-85 are still healthy and active.
That is not why. Group operators have a strategy that involves bundling stations that serve some segment of the 18-54 audience and having an “outlier” format does not fit and will not work.They go to restaurants, take cruises, get their cars repaired. They are still consumers while they are alive. Corporate Radio and agencies shun them because "It's too hard to get a sale".
Much of corporate radio selling is agency and part of multi-market buys. Those agencies just DO NOT BUY 55+. So those groups would have to have separate sales staffs for a different 55 and over pitch, and that makes no economic sense within the higher cost structure of a larger group operator.That's what you've said countless times. If an independent operator can monetize older demos, then a Corporate group should be able to. They have decided it's not worth it...
I said that for most s rations there is no money in programming to an older audience. But as has been shown by WECK there are enough local accounts and smaller local independent agencies that it can be very profitable .
WBEN has become an "outlier" format. The demos of that station aren't in line with Audacy's other stations. The days of WBEN being a 25-54 player are long gone...That is not why. Group operators have a strategy that involves bundling stations that serve some segment of the 18-54 audience and having an “outlier” format does not fit and will not work.
Much of corporate radio selling is agency and part of multi-market buys. Those agencies just DO NOT BUY 55+. So those groups would have to have separate sales staffs for a different 55 and over pitch, and that makes no economic sense within the higher cost structure of a larger group operator.
Doesn't he have one in Key West FL? For what it's worth...The other aspect is this is Buddy's ONLY radio station.
You keep neglecting the fact that they sell WBEN as part of a cluster. Clusters sell together, not in kibbles and bits.WBEN has become an "outlier" format. The demos of that station aren't in line with Audacy's other stations. The days of WBEN being a 25-54 player are long gone...
That's exactly what I said. The format is obsolete based on the criteria you stated in post #22 in this very thread...You keep neglecting the fact that they sell WBEN as part of a cluster. Clusters sell together, not in kibbles and bits.
It is his only Bufflo station... a stand-alone.Doesn't he have one in Key West FL? For what it's worth...
No, the format still gets enough in the 45-54 demo to add to cluster buys. My point is that most sales by cluster groups is for several or even all the stations together. Rates are based on multiple stations, not just one.That's exactly what I said. The format is obsolete based on the criteria you stated in post #22 in this very thread...
Not at all in the radio business but just a casual observer. It almost seems like you have a personal hatred of stations that serve upper demos, what's with that? I'm in the 45-54 demo and I do listen to WBEN occasionally throughout the day when I'm Doordashing. Though it still has a a slightly to the right political lean, it tries to not be entirely political and in fact there are many days when Baurle tells a caller to stay away from making a topic political. It's not the same WBEN of 10 years ago with Rush Limbaugh setting the tone for the rest of the day's lineup.That's exactly what I said. The format is obsolete based on the criteria you stated in post #22 in this very thread...
NPR isn't left wing.Not at all in the radio business but just a casual observer. It almost seems like you have a personal hatred of stations that serve upper demos, what's with that? I'm in the 45-54 demo and I do listen to WBEN occasionally throughout the day when I'm Doordashing. Though it still has a a slightly to the right political lean, it tries to not be entirely political and in fact there are many days when Baurle tells a caller to stay away from making a topic political. It's not the same WBEN of 10 years ago with Rush Limbaugh setting the tone for the rest of the day's lineup.
I listen to WBEN because it has a local focus, with local news, traffic, weather and talk about local topics. If it was just syndicated right wing talk all day I wouldn't be listening to it.
WBFO on the other hand has moved away from their local focus and has become exclusively left wing syndicated NPR programming (or local high school sports, what's with that?). When an important local story is happening and I'm listening to the radio, I seek out WBEN not WBFO. Also, even though I like the music on WBFO The Bridge, I don't like it at the cost of talk programming. If the Bridge was a stand alone station I'd listen, but it's not on WBFO at a time of day I ordinarily listen to the radio.
It has the presentation of being objective but it is clearly leans left. If you don't listen to any other news sources then you might think otherwise. Almost every topic has to do with intersectionality or abortion rights. It gets tiring to listen to after awhile and I actually used to be a member.NPR isn't left wing.
I listen to a lot of news sources and it isn't left wing. I've worked for an NPR station- have you?It has the presentation of being objective but it is clearly leans left. If you don't listen to any other news sources then you might think otherwise. Almost every topic has to do with intersectionality or abortion rights. It gets tiring to listen to after awhile and I actually used to be a member.
It has the presentation of being objective but it is clearly leans left. If you don't listen to any other news sources then you might think otherwise. Almost every topic has to do with intersectionality or abortion rights.
No, but if you work there then it may explain why you are blind to it. I knew posting my opinion on here was useless. Everyone is in their entrenched camps here I see, much like the larger society. Look, if I listen to the hosts on the Daily Wire I know what I'm getting, they make no bones about not treating both sides fairly. However NPR and the NY Times try to hold themselves up as fair and objective but they have a bias (to the left) just as strong as the Federalist or Daily Wire does to the right. They just cloak it in respectibility and a mature tone. Many times they are blind to it because everyone around them thinks the same.I listen to a lot of news sources and it isn't left wing. I've worked for an NPR station- have you?
Many times they are blind to it because everyone around them thinks the same.
The lens through which you view these 2 stations reveals much. You say WBEN is only "slightly" Right Wing, while NPR is "exclusively Left Wing". That's distorting reality.Not at all in the radio business but just a casual observer. It almost seems like you have a personal hatred of stations that serve upper demos, what's with that? I'm in the 45-54 demo and I do listen to WBEN occasionally throughout the day when I'm Doordashing. Though it still has a a slightly to the right political lean, it tries to not be entirely political and in fact there are many days when Baurle tells a caller to stay away from making a topic political. It's not the same WBEN of 10 years ago with Rush Limbaugh setting the tone for the rest of the day's lineup.
I listen to WBEN because it has a local focus, with local news, traffic, weather and talk about local topics. If it was just syndicated right wing talk all day I wouldn't be listening to it.
WBFO on the other hand has moved away from their local focus and has become exclusively left wing syndicated NPR programming (or local high school sports, what's with that?). When an important local story is happening and I'm listening to the radio, I seek out WBEN not WBFO. Also, even though I like the music on WBFO The Bridge, I don't like it at the cost of talk programming. If the Bridge was a stand alone station I'd listen, but it's not on WBFO at a time of day I ordinarily listen to the radio.
The only one who is blind here is you. I spent 40 years at WBFO. Referring to WBEN as “slightly to the right” tells me all I need to know about your leanings. Listen! I reported dozens of stories for NPR in my career. You have no idea how painful NPR’s editing process was. Every sentence was scrutinized to make sure there was no bias. The problem the right has is that they don’t understand that it’s the media’s job to challenge and hold accountable those who are in power. FOX will only challenge the left. The right, including he who shall not be named, gets a free pass. NPR and the NY Times question both sides. In fact, many on the left have criticized the Times for going overboard on President Biden, especially after that disastrous June debate, while not holding his opponent to the same standard. So, please spare me that the media leans left.No, but if you work there then it may explain why you are blind to it. I knew posting my opinion on here was useless. Everyone is in their entrenched camps here I see, much like the larger society. Look, if I listen to the hosts on the Daily Wire I know what I'm getting, they make no bones about not treating both sides fairly. However NPR and the NY Times try to hold themselves up as fair and objective but they have a bias (to the left) just as strong as the Federalist or Daily Wire does to the right. They just cloak it in respectibility and a mature tone. Many times they are blind to it because everyone around them thinks the same.
Read it wrong. I was thinking Yardbirds , the oldies listener was thinking Tie a Yellow Ribbon…I was thinking bring my 4 idols, John, Paul , George and Ringo to the format ,others were thinkng JUST Elvis. I always said there was a place for both. They always said we played too much Beatles. My bad ..I guess