• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Shake up at KLUV

KLUV has replaced long time Dallas on-air personality Sandi Sharp with the Tom Kent show in evenings

Sandi is a very good friend of mine, and I know this came as a big shock to her. (this business can really s * * k some times!!)

She reads these blogs from time to time. Anyone have any job info for her?

Hang in there Sandi!

:)
 
Why don't these stations just pull the plug and automate and syndicate 24x7? I assume if live and local doesn't matter after 7pm why not do so at 1pm?
 
the website says she has moved to weekends... ???

That allows the station to pay her board-up money but keep her name affiliated with the station. The fans of her show won't be as ticked off, and the station positions itself as the good guy with the talent. As if the station is doing HER a favor by giving her weekend hours.

They're probably getting Tom Kent in a spot trade deal. Not much real cash, if any, will leave the station.

Very corporate radio. Very CBS.
 
SmokeRing said:
Very corporate radio. Very CBS.

I agree, and I can speak from personal experience. I worked at CBS radio twice and left in the mid 90's.

Many years ago the letters CBS stood for the Columbia Broadcasting System and as the company evolved the letters became just that: three letters denoting the official company name. My nickname for them back then seems even more appropriate now: Convoluted Bull S...
 
Cruddy BullSschizenbach if you ask me. Sandi is a great great talent and doesnt deserve to be placed like that ,as if she was furniture. I am so tired of hearing "thats bidness". It should be called lack of leadership,lack of local input (read audience)lack of letting a local PD be a PD.
 
Tom Kent does a great "high profile" personality show !
I'm guessing clearing his show might be less expensive for a station like KLUV than doing it locally.

Upgrade talent.
Reduce costs.

Don't need to have a degree in business to figure that one out (although I do).
 
Steve Eberhart said:
Tom Kent does a great "high profile" personality show !
I'm guessing clearing his show might be less expensive for a station like KLUV than doing it locally.

Upgrade talent.
Reduce costs.
Sure, but what does it say about either the market as a whole, CBS as a cluster, or KLUV as a station (or some combo of those 3) that a station that is a top 10 station 12+ (and I'd need to check where they are 25-54) is having to grab a show off 'the bird'?

Either they're not doing as well as we might think 25-54, or they just can't sell what they've got...
 
Little 1 is correct .When you have KLLI practically draining CBS,KRLD whimpering along,and Movin just stagnant,those three alone can save money by eliminating talent due to over all per performance..One over blown afternoon mouth on 105.3 comes to mind where cuts should begin. Tom Kent's show is good, but LIVE talent is better and far more welcomed. Lastly get the suits out of programming,and have someone who knows about programming actually do it.
 
Remember, too, that KLUV was sweating bullets for a while, expecting CC to flip La Preciosa to Pop Oldies, then expecting Citadel to flip Twister to Pop Oldies, but neither one happened. I guess CBS now feels safe that no contender will ever come along and program against KLUV...so it's time to pare the operation down to nothing, knowing that listeners have no other place to go. Much as I like John Summers and Debi Diaz, both on and off the air, I wouldn't be shocked if one of them was laid off in the next few months. I'm sure they're both in that "sweet spot" (which seems to be anything over $50K a year, lately) where corporate thinks they can install a per-hour kid to be a glorified board op instead, pocket the difference, and the listeners can kiss corporate's a$$ if they have any problem with it.

My suggestions? You've got other outlets in the CBS cluster that could stand MAJOR upheavals...but leave KLUV alone. (Of course, they could just as easily kept Mary Rose at KVIL and made HER the overnight babysitter for the rest of the [voicetracked] stations instead of Bob Gomez at KLUV.) Sell off KRLD and TSN, along with low-watter 107.5. Cut ALL your losses at KLLI and either program music or syndie talk (hell, move Movin' there if you're so damn married to that format.) Cut half of Jody Dean's morning crew. Sell the Carpenter building and consolidate the last pieces of it at Fitzhugh. Kill off the stupid, tired imaging at Jack, keep the basic format but rename it and quit paying the licensing fees for the Jack name. And, of course, I could suggest a few managers to let go, in the name of job duplication and lack of REAL contribution to the organization!

Nah, much easier to take it out on the talent instead. I'm very sorry to hear about Sandi Sharp.
 
All that requires actually doing your job and THINKING about how to properly run a station.
It's much easier to go with the knee-jerk cost cutting measure of firing talent.
Always looks good on the balance sheet.
 
Live local is a great concept...IF you have talent that can supercede what is available elsewhere.

Why do you think people like Kraddick (and Tom Kent) are successful in syndication? Because they are affordable and can upgrade the product.

Just being on live/local doesn't necessarily make you better. Do you think the typical listener (not you and I) has any idea Tom Kent is not standing in the KLUV control room?
 
Mike, I appreciate your insight into CBS. The few times I go to KLUV it is when Sandi is (was) on. Dean and crew are cool but the cultic laughs and gang mentality is wearisome to me. I like the way you think.
 
Steve Eberhart said:
Just being on live/local doesn't necessarily make you better. Do you think the typical listener (not you and I) has any idea Tom Kent is not standing in the KLUV control room?

YES!! I DO think the "typical listener" knows Tom Kent is not standing in the KLUV control room! 1) Sandi had a ton of loyal listeners who called in every night - who are now asking, "what happened??" 2) Tom gives an 800 number to call

Tom is just as impersonal and non-local as Delilah! Who, by the way, along with Mary Rose, is not standing in the KVIL control room.
 
SmokeRing said:
the website says she has moved to weekends... ???

That allows the station to pay her board-up money but keep her name affiliated with the station. The fans of her show won't be as ticked off, and the station positions itself as the good guy with the talent. As if the station is doing HER a favor by giving her weekend hours.

Very corporate radio. Very CBS.

Get this: They cut her on Friday - and on Monday asked if she could come in and run the Tom Kent board this week!

Which by the way, she is doing. :(
 
DFWPT said:
Steve Eberhart said:
Just being on live/local doesn't necessarily make you better. Do you think the typical listener (not you and I) has any idea Tom Kent is not standing in the KLUV control room?

YES!! I DO think the "typical listener" knows Tom Kent is not standing in the KLUV control room! 1) Sandi had a ton of loyal listeners who called in every night - who are now asking, "what happened??" 2) Tom gives an 800 number to call

Tom is just as impersonal and non-local as Delilah! Who, by the way, along with Mary Rose, is not standing in the KVIL control room.

I HATE Delilah !! She makes me want to PUKE every stinking time I have to listen to her. She is so fricking sugar coated I think a diabetic would go into insulin shock just listening to her.

I want to smash my radio with a sledge hammer when I have to listen to her drivel.
 
Mike has a great idea..no surprise from Him,pure common sense.
Steve I admire your work and your track record,but on this one, I believe being a consultant and a station owner has diminished your skills as a listener.

I believe a listener is intelligent enough to know a live local show from a syndicator. I knew many years ago Before I even got into radio. The avg. listener is not that naive,the avg consultant, suit is. As one mentioned before the big tip off is the 1 800 number.
KLUV is ripe for the taking if another oldies/classics station came along and was programmed with talent that knew the music,interacted with its listeners,and promoted well.
 
Why do you think people like Kraddick (and Tom Kent) are successful in syndication? Because they are affordable and can upgrade the product.

Kraddick, yes. But if Tom Kent is an upgrade for your Top 5 market station, then you don't know talent, or, more likely, you can't afford to pay for talent.

Syndicated music programming is for stations that suffer from one or the other.
 
(1) Tom Kent is, without a doubt, the best syndicated night show available.

(2) I agree with Steve that being live and local solely for the sake of being live and local isn't a good thing.

(3) If a top-5 station in a top-5 market has to start cutting to increase its bottom line, something seems a little wrong to me.

(4) Sandi Sharp is a class act to be running the board for the syndicated show that replaced her.

(5) Good luck to Sandi. She was always nice to me when this Texas boy called her from St. Louis to make a request!

(6) Good luck to the rest of the K-Luv crew. Hopefully, CBS won't swing the axe at anyone else.
 
(3) If a top-5 station in a top-5 market has to start cutting to increase its bottom line, something seems a little wrong to me.

More than a little. But you're on the right track.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom