Mookie said:Seriously, what is going on? If it's not classic rock it's KJZZ flipping to modern hits in the exact same format as about 4 other stations in SEA-TAC market.
Not being a Seattle native I think the formats for music on radio here is fairly limited.
FMSteve said:If not for KMCQ, KEXP, KUOW and KKWF HD 2 Smooth Jazz, this market absolutely SUCKS. I was just starting to like KMTT when three weeks ago they reverted back to the same ole' garbage.
choppler said:I have listened to KMTT for years. The format nows sucks. I am 55 years old and a staple of Classic Rock sounds, as much as I love them is BORING! As I said the new format sucks. I am going elsewhere. Too bad; I like John Fisher and Marty Reimer. So much for the Mountain Music CD's, concert events, etc. They now beat great tunes to death. The same six U2 tunes over and over. The same 5 Rolling Stones tunes over and over. The same whatever over and over. Sorry John and Marty. Going somewhere else.
FMSteve said:If not for KMCQ, KEXP, KUOW and KKWF HD 2 Smooth Jazz, this market absolutely SUCKS. I was just starting to like KMTT when three weeks ago they reverted back to the same ole' garbage.
gentlemen, dont panic! try the KINK stream. some good HD channels there too. KINK, on sunday morning has some of the best AAA programming in the country. if that dont work for ya, get XM/Sirius. that DEEP TRACKS channel is the best album rock channel around. XM/SR also has meg griffin, and dan neer, programming that great music. best on air talent in the business. tired of Mcradio in seattle? then move on to better! its very simple. we know you can make the big move.JakeMott said:Even most of the HD2 and HD3 signals suck. In other cities the extra HD formats are much better, along with the main signal formats.FMSteve said:If not for KMCQ, KEXP, KUOW and KKWF HD 2 Smooth Jazz, this market absolutely SUCKS. I was just starting to like KMTT when three weeks ago they reverted back to the same ole' garbage.
scott salvatori said:choppler said:I have listened to KMTT for years. The format nows sucks. I am 55 years old and a staple of Classic Rock sounds, as much as I love them is BORING! As I said the new format sucks. I am going elsewhere. Too bad; I like John Fisher and Marty Reimer. So much for the Mountain Music CD's, concert events, etc. They now beat great tunes to death. The same six U2 tunes over and over. The same 5 Rolling Stones tunes over and over. The same whatever over and over. Sorry John and Marty. Going somewhere else.FMSteve said:If not for KMCQ, KEXP, KUOW and KKWF HD 2 Smooth Jazz, this market absolutely SUCKS. I was just starting to like KMTT when three weeks ago they reverted back to the same ole' garbage.gentlemen, dont panic! try the KINK stream. some good HD channels there too. KINK, on sunday morning has some of the best AAA programming in the country. if that dont work for ya, get XM/Sirius. that DEEP TRACKS channel is the best album rock channel around. XM/SR also has meg griffin, and dan neer, programming that great music. best on air talent in the business. tired of Mcradio in seattle? then move on to better! its very simple. we know you can make the big move.JakeMott said:Even most of the HD2 and HD3 signals suck. In other cities the extra HD formats are much better, along with the main signal formats.FMSteve said:If not for KMCQ, KEXP, KUOW and KKWF HD 2 Smooth Jazz, this market absolutely SUCKS. I was just starting to like KMTT when three weeks ago they reverted back to the same ole' garbage.
Since when has a DJ been able to play their own choice? Maybe a little over at KZOK, but otherwise, FORGET IT. Those days a LONG GONE, way before the latest at KMTT. And I was gone the FIRST time they fired Reimer.choppler said:I have listened to KMTT for years. The format nows sucks. I am 55 years old and a staple of Classic Rock sounds, as much as I love them is BORING! As I said the new format sucks. I am going elsewhere. Too bad; I like John Fisher and Marty Reimer. So much for the Mountain Music CD's, concert events, etc. They now beat great tunes to death. The same six U2 tunes over and over. The same 5 Rolling Stones tunes over and over. The same whatever over and over. Sorry John and Marty. Going somewhere else.
listeners make some false assumptions: yep, and thats the way the stations wants it. they want the average listener to assume its their local air talent sitting in their town/market. i wonder how many listenrs percentage wise, realize it aint local? or it actually aint live. most have a busy life, and prob could care less to think about the details. what they dont know wont hurt them, is the hope.Bill Wolfenbarger said:We didn't play our choice 45 years ago at KRKO in Everett. Listeners, however, have always made some false assumptions, including:
1. I hear his voice, so he must be there and is live.
2. He said the call letters, so he must be local.
3. He said to call with a request, so that means that he will play it right after I ask.
4. the phone-in caller he just aired was live.
5. the funny little one-liner was impromptu and thought up by the disk jockey.
6. the other voice with the dj is sitting next to him.
etc.
What has always amused me is that national live programming will often be identified as "canned", while voice-tracking is often confused with "live". For many years, small rural stations with limited revenue opportunities have been forced to use automation and/or network programming to maintain a full operating schedule. Now the major markets have embraced these platforms because they can. A small market station grossing a couple hundred thousand dollars a year can't afford more than a couple employees. A station in Seattle grossing 10 million should be able to afford a staff.
scott salvatori said:listeners make some false assumptions: yep, and thats the way the stations wants it. they want the average listener to assume its their local air talent sitting in their town/market. i wonder how many listenrs percentage wise, realize it aint local? or it actually aint live. most have a busy life, and prob could care less to think about the details. what they dont know wont hurt them, is the hope.Bill Wolfenbarger said:We didn't play our choice 45 years ago at KRKO in Everett. Listeners, however, have always made some false assumptions, including:
1. I hear his voice, so he must be there and is live.
2. He said the call letters, so he must be local.
3. He said to call with a request, so that means that he will play it right after I ask.
4. the phone-in caller he just aired was live.
5. the funny little one-liner was impromptu and thought up by the disk jockey.
6. the other voice with the dj is sitting next to him.
etc.
What has always amused me is that national live programming will often be identified as "canned", while voice-tracking is often confused with "live". For many years, small rural stations with limited revenue opportunities have been forced to use automation and/or network programming to maintain a full operating schedule. Now the major markets have embraced these platforms because they can. A small market station grossing a couple hundred thousand dollars a year can't afford more than a couple employees. A station in Seattle grossing 10 million should be able to afford a staff.
a seattle station grossing 10 million should be able to afford a staff: gross is one thing, expenses is another. ask any commercial farmer, or independent truck driver. 10 million gross sounds good. until one realizes the load of payments/interest payments on the mother ships debt load. but, then again, whos responsible for that debt load in the first place? overzealous upper management, who bit off more than they can financially chew?
AQH said:I know I'm setting myself up here, but are jocks blame-free in any of this?
scott salvatori said:a seattle station grossing 10 million should be able to afford a staff: gross is one thing, expenses is another. ask any commercial farmer, or independent truck driver. 10 million gross sounds good. until one realizes the load of payments/interest payments on the mother ships debt load. but, then again, whos responsible for that debt load in the first place? overzealous upper management, who bit off more than they can financially chew?
RockTheGlobe said:Regardless of what this industry's product is (entertainment and music), it's still a business, and the owners/financial backers tend to be concerned about the bottom line.