J
Jul
Guest
Should CBS Radio fire Don Imus and end his "Imus in the morning" program. Yes or No?
I won't be shocked if CBS Radio fires him today.Reporter said:He'll be Fired by 5 pm Friday...(tomorow)
Get real people. He's gone. He doesn't have any protection in the executive ranks of CBS anymore, either.
Johnny Morgan said:Get real people. He's gone. He doesn't have any protection in the executive ranks of CBS anymore, either.
I have a question then. Once you're gotten Imus's head, and he's fired...what's next then. Are all of the problems caused by his words just going to magically go away? Will race relations in America be immediately, and permanently, resolved such that much hand-holding and daisies in tow will be spread across this fruited plain?
Or will the activists like yourself then turn their attention to Charles McCord, Bernard McGuirk, the WFAN program director, CBS Radio management, and CBS executives themselves?
Or will you merely pat yourselves on the back for getting someone fired and wait for the next guy to "slip up"--while staying eerily silent on national race relations in the meantime?
Lando Griffin said:CBS may, unfortunately, crumble under presure from the rabble-rousers and protests of people who most likely never listen to Imus anyway.
Imus, however, has won more publicity for his Radiothon today, which I predict will bring in record numbers of donations. The results will, in turn, insure Imus will be back on the air after a suspension whether he's later fired or not.
Advertisers may initially back down to the bullying of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition and the National Action Network, but there will still be more potential sponsors waiting in line to take those spots, justifying their decisions by realizing the Imus audience is large, active and high-income. If CBS fires him, someone else will pick him up when the smoke clears.
Another thought to consider: Who will take Imus' place on WFAN or Westwood One network? WFAN will lose people to WEPN or WABC quickly without the anchor personality who reaches the stations desired demos... This is no lowest common denominator "Opie and Anthony" show we are talking about (you can find other lowbrow "personalities" to take over for them), Imus brings big money listeners to his advertisers... it will be a long time before finding a "new" Imus guy to keep up station billing. As for Westwood One, they can drop Imus, but the stations that subscribe may defect to Mancow and possible adopt more TRN programs, which could hurt WW1...
The Imus firing fallout may be much worse than the knee-jerk reactions of some companies afraid of the dreaded "R-Word."
Johnny Morgan said:I'm not spinning anything to you. I am asking questions that come directly from the position(s) you are advocating. I don't know that you are right, in fact quite the opposite, I believe you and Sharpton, et al. are incorrect on this issue.
I'm a conservative, too (see the Off-Air board for more of that, and see how far it's ggotten me over there)--one who values the course of open dialogue and don't seek to have anyone who disagrees with me silenced simply for uttering (or even having a course of uttering) impolite words. I refuse to see race as the great overarching issue that colors everything in our lives, and seek out racial tension in every single comment. Nor do I find racism to be as prevalent in society, culture, etc. as activists make it out to be.
I'm also aware of how politics works in this country, and that media politics in particular are beasts with their own rules. Media perception is important, and the media perception of this is that no station dare have a racist on their staff...if that racist is white and makes impolite comments about anything.
What I don't understand are the changing reasons for firing Don Imus. Is it the words he spoke? Is it because he's a racist? Is it money? When will it end? Who is next?
And how does his firing at all affect the purported race issue in the country as a whole?
Quite aside from being out of touch with reality, I think both you and I are very in touch with reality. It just happens that we are on different sides of the issue. Being subjectively incorrect on an issue doesn't make either of us "out of touch". It makes us subjectively incorrect.
Does anyone really, honestly believe that any of the Rutgers' players are "nappy headed hos"? If anyone honestly does think that, THERE is your race issue. THAT person needs to be talked to, and talked about, to find out why it is he thinks that. If that person is Don Imus, then so be it.
Chopping off the head in a quest for blood to appease some inner feeling of dominance is not solving anything other than the blood letting. And that never stops. It just goes into remission.
radioman1380 said:A person's career should not be ended because of one stupid mistake in judgement.