Re: NO!
> > Ultimately, Iron City's problems are really bad tasting
> > beer.
>
> I guess some people like chicken and others steak- but I
> really do think Iron City is GREAT beer!
>
> It legitimately is my favorite- not too bold like a dark
> beer and not too pale like Rolling Rock, Bud, or Coors (and
> especially Coors Light- which tastes like the can).
From an objective standpoint (if that's possible), beer "experts" claim that Iron City has too much hops for mass appeal to modern palates. Personally, I like a very "hoppy" beer like Iron City, but according to taste test research, the majority of people don't.
Supposedly, Iron City's high hop content makes it an especially good companion to cheap whiskey. When selecting a beer to wash down a shot of whiskey, Iron City's hoppy bitterness becomes an asset.
Your assesment of Coors Light is dead-on correct.
> IF I MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION- And keeping my love of all
> things local, if you want to have a really good taste to go
> with a "steak and potato" meal, try Penn Pilsner Dark.
>
> Lots of taste- just really hits the spot.
Penn Pilsner Dark is one of the finest tasting libations that can be found anywhere upon the Earth.
To put this digression slightly on-topic, I find it mildly interesting that beer experts can use the same sort of market testing to measure the appeal of beer that radio experts use to test the appeal of songs. Those who like the taste of Iron City Beer like it a great deal, even though they tend to be among the minority. A good case could be made that fans of Iron City beer are like the fans of classic rock deep cuts -- few in number but deeply loyal.