I really should read this stuff more often, IT'S AMUSING!!! OK, let's all be honest. Stations have been negotiating "exclusives" since Kenny Chesney was a glimmer in his fathers eye so no shocker there... The only loser in that proposition was the Wolf. I commend them for taking a shot at it but they were rightfully put in their place. Should there be exclusives? ABSOLUTELY! Why you ask? Because regardless of whether you are the exclusive station or not, your going to pound the heck out of a KC show because he's a core country artist. Meanwhile the promoter get's more leverage out of the bigger station by allowing on site exclusivity. Good for promoter and good for one radio station. I suppose it's good if it's YOUR radio station... If it's not, lie to the listeners and tell them you are bigger, better and have more tickets, throw the magnetic logo's on the panel van, pay six bucks for parking and put on your station logo'd jacket (even if it's 80 degrees) and wear it proudly backstage!! That's what every other #2 station in America does in that situation...
Having said that, regardless of who you are or whatever station you represent, if given the same opportunity at a core artist concert and told it was yours and only yours, you would see to it the other station was removed as well. I think the only scorned posters here must be employed by Wolf.... Though your moral compass seems to be pointing South at the moment, you'd jump at the opportunity do the same if the truth were told..
I don't know much about TQR and Wolf but it sounds like every other "new vs. old" country battle in the world... (QDR vs Rooster in my world) I certainly don't think it shows fear by dashing the competitors hopes of courting the concert goers. Sounds like a well negotiated "trump" to me.