• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Sid Rosenberg v. Mayor Mamdani

Status
Not open for further replies.
And then there's a "mathematical" form of dyslexia called dyscalculia which is what I suffer from and probably why I was so horrible at back-timing. But they never found out I had it till several years after high school. You'd think the math teachers would have thought there was a problem and address it instead of calling me an idiot.
 
And then there's a "mathematical" form of dyslexia called dyscalculia which is what I suffer from and probably why I was so horrible at back-timing. But they never found out I had it till several years after high school. You'd think the math teachers would have thought there was a problem and address it instead of calling me an idiot.
Things like the different forms of dyslexia and the less obvious manifestations of autism have not been well recognized until fairly recent decades. Even now, dealing with those conditions or challenges is not a core part of the teaching curriculum at many if not most colleges.

In particular, I think those of us over 50 grew up when the awareness of different learning challenges was very poor; those of us with any of the conditions were often subject to ridicule both in sports and the classroom.
 
Here's more background on Sid Rosenberg's apology to Mamdani. According to this, he spoke to his rabbi:


Rosenberg told Politico that his apology came after conversations with his rabbi, family members and boss, WABC owner John Catsimatidis, though he said there were “no ultimatums” from Catsimatidis.
 
The fact is, however, that a significant percentage of Americans would, secretly perhaps, agree with Sid's opinion.

The opinion was poorly and tastelessly expressed, but, while Mandami was elected by a considerable majority in New York City, he has instilled fear and anxiety among many of us.

Sid has the right to an opinion. His bad judgement was in the way he expressed himself, not in the opinions themselves.
Expression of opinions that are hurtful towards others have consequences. He needs to think about why he hates him.
 
Here's more background on Sid Rosenberg's apology to Mamdani. According to this, he spoke to his rabbi:
That's the equivalent of a Catholic who goes to confession on Saturday afternoon and gets "absolved" of their sins for the prior week, only to repeat the same cycle immediately after taking communion at Mass.

And all this time, I thought Sid was his own rabbi.
 
But nearby Nassau County in Long Island us
Pretty conservative.

They don't vote for NYC mayor. People in Staten Island are also conservative, and they vote for NYC mayor.

What I'm saying is a NY radio host can say whatever he wants. It'll get him a 5 share, but not enough to win an election.

Consider Curtis Sliwa. He's a radio talk show host who ran for NYC mayor and couldn't beat Mamdani.
 
Keep in mind there are some in this country who view Catholics that way. For years they wouldn't vote for a Catholic political candidate because they were concerned the candidate would be more responsive to the Pope than to the American people.
That subset of voters stopped being effective or influential two-thirds of a century ago. The evidence was the election of JFK, but the cause dated back to WW II where soldiers of different faiths came together in defense of the country and the Allies..
There were numerous religious groups who came to this country because they were persecuted in their home countries. It's why we have freedom of religion here. It requires a certain amount of religious tolerance on all sides in order for it to work.
But, as was said long ago, the freedom of others stops at the tip of my nose. If one faith group should attempt to limit the expression of others, then it has gone too far. }

Censuring a radio host for the content of a post is wrong if what is being criticized is his choice of language. But the underlying sentiment is protected.
As I said earlier in this post, the mayor is not a dictator. The way the New York City government is set up, each of the five boroughs have presidents who represent their districts. Anything the mayor does has to get approval from the city council. He can't force an ideology on the city without it getting council approval. New York is not a majority Muslim city. Not even close. The people who live there knew the facts and weren't scared.
40% of NYC residents are foreign born. Over half speak a language other than English "at home". I understand the concern of many being about the loss of the need and necessity to assimilate and become, in some manner, "Americans" when there is no longer a majority culture.
 
Wait til you hear about America’s food system and what happens to animals.
Once talked to the guy who ran a Bob Evans slaughterhouse about radio advertising (he had bought "safety" ads through a third party and I was trying tp get a direct buy out of him). He told me of employees who had no problem packing the meat, but wanted nothing to do with the kill floor. Yeah, deport and denaturalize a certain population group over that? We have to deport all but the vegans them.
 
That subset of voters stopped being effective or influential two-thirds of a century ago. The evidence was the election of JFK, but the cause dated back to WW II where soldiers of different faiths came together in defense of the country and the Allies..

But, as was said long ago, the freedom of others stops at the tip of my nose. If one faith group should attempt to limit the expression of others, then it has gone too far. }

Censuring a radio host for the content of a post is wrong if what is being criticized is his choice of language. But the underlying sentiment is protected.

40% of NYC residents are foreign born. Over half speak a language other than English "at home". I understand the concern of many being about the loss of the need and necessity to assimilate and become, in some manner, "Americans" when there is no longer a majority culture.
A white culture (whatever that is)? Seems kinda boring to me. You're sounding like Tennessee Congressman Andy Ogles, whose running on open white supremacy and being anti-Muslim.
 
A white culture (whatever that is)?
No, an American culture. Back in the early 70's when I lived in Puerto Rico, I knew a number of former soldiers who had fought in WW II and the Korean War, both in the 65th Infantry and in general forces. They told me of how their service years had been their first experiences with non-Hispanics and that the "strangeness" was soon overcome by the unity of shared combat and military experiences.

I referenced JFK as his election overcame the perceived reluctance to name national office candidates who were Catholic. But his all-too-short term in office resulted in considerable enfranchisement of Blacks, as I personally witnessed a coupla' years after his election when I went with my co-workers at Cleveland's WJMO to register voters in Newton, Mississippi.
Seems kinda boring to me. You're sounding like Tennessee Congressman Andy Ogles, whose running on open white supremacy and being anti-Muslim.
That is quite an insult towards a person whose entire living family is Hispanic and who started his career as the "token white" at R&B WJMO and worked all his adult life among Hispanic, either in Latin America or in the SoCal Hispanic community.
 
No, an American culture.
Which includes Muslims.
I referenced JFK as his election overcame the perceived reluctance to name national office candidates who were Catholic.
And now that’s directed at Muslims, or are we going to pretend the label Muslim wasn’t incorrectly applied to President Obama as a pejorative.

That is quite an insult towards a person whose entire living family is Hispanic and who started his career as the "token white" at R&B WJMO and worked all his adult life among Hispanic, either in Latin America or in the SoCal Hispanic community.
And yet the blatant bigoted insults toward Muslims? A-ok.

Dear god, the hypocrisy is remarkable if not entirely predictable.
 
Which includes Muslims.
... if they make an intent to integrate with American culture.
And, like any group, there are different "kinds" of Muslims. Some, like those that flew into the World Trade Towers, are not "inclusive" nor should they be accommodated.
And now that’s directed at Muslims, or are we going to pretend the label Muslim wasn’t incorrectly applied to President Obama as a pejorative.
Some ignorant people did apply that quality in an effort to de-Americanize him. That does not mean that there was consensus in that aspect.
And yet the blatant bigoted insults toward Muslims? A-ok.
Stating the facts about Muslims who are opposed to the principles of this nation is neither bigoted nor insulting. I have no tolerance for those imams who talk about making this country totally Muslim and converting the infidels in their Friday Jumu’ah sermons.
Dear god, the hypocrisy is remarkable if not entirely predictable.
So, instead of apologizing, you add insult to injury. Talking about "predictable".

I disagree with you in sociopolitical areas, but that does not call on you to insult my beliefs. You avidly defend yours, but denigrate or insult the feelings of others. In this case, we were talking about a radio host who aggressively described the mayor of New York, perhaps using excessive language. Again, it is his right to say those things and ours to censure or criticize them. But it is not our right to silence him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom