• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Sinclair in talks to get WSB-TV

https://www.bizjournals.com/baltimo...roadcast-ceo-eyes-deal-for-foxs-regional.html

Yes Sinclair is talking about getting WSB-TV as part of a series of talks to get the Cox Stations. Concurrently Sinclair is talking about getting the Fox Sports Regional stations like Fox Sports West

Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. is eyeing potential deals with its attempted takeover of Tribune Media Co. a thing of the past.

CEO Chris Ripley said Tuesday the pipeline for mergers and acquisitions "is quite full right now." In particular, Hunt Valley-based Sinclair could look at acquiring 14 TV stations currently owned by Cox Enterprises Inc. or 21st Century Fox Inc.'s portfolio of 22 regional sports networks.

Ripley called the regional sports networks an "interesting fit" because Sinclair's already has the infrastructure in place to improve production, administration and sales for the networks. Sinclair (NASDAQ: SBGI) is the largest TV broadcaster in the U.S. with 191 television stations in 89 markets.

The regional sports networks are up for sale because the Walt Disney Co.'s (NYSE: DIS) acquisition of Fox (NASDAQ: FOX). The U.S. Department Justice made the sale of the networks a condition for approval of the $71 billion deal. Guggenheim Securities valued the package at $22.4 billion, the Los Angeles Times reported.

""It’s a very interesting fit," Ripley said "It of course has to be at the right value. It has to be accretive."

To make a deal happen, Ripley said Sinclair would need to partner with a private equity firm because it has to be an all-cash transaction.

"You could do it through a joint venture with a private equity fund where it would be a separate sister company, or you can do it on balance sheet," Ripley said.

Sinclair has been looking for deals as it looks to gain the size and scale needed to survive in today's media landscape. People have been cutting cords and are choosing to use services like Netflix, Hulu and YouTubeTV to satisfy their viewing needs.

Broadcasters like Sinclair need to get bigger and evolve, Ripley said. One of those ways is by adding more subscription-based content, like Fox's regional sports networks.


https://www.ftvlive.com/sqsp-test/2018/10/9/this-should-scare-the-hell-out-of-cox-employees
 
Isn’t Sinclair an extremely conservative based media operation? More so than Fox News. I am curious as to how that would affect WSB-TV’s programming.
 
Isn’t Sinclair an extremely conservative based media operation? More so than Fox News. I am curious as to how that would affect WSB-TV’s programming.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6ndxhwxYXk

Yes and there was plenty of talks about that when Sinclair Leaders wanted to take over KTLA Los Angeles as part of the failed Tribune deal. Also during the same Tribune talks there were persistent rumors that Sinclair wanted to grab Pro-Trump Viewers away from Fox News with a rumored network where they were going to get pundits away from Fox News in that rumor.


https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/fox-news-wins-big-sinclair-tribune-deal-cancellation-1133589
 
To, the head of Cox and WSB TV..... Please.... PLEASE don't let Sinclair buy your station! Better yet...If you have to, THROW yourselves at Disney and become and ABC owned station before Sinclair grabs you. Say no to Sinclair, please!! As a viewer of your station.... PLEASE!
 
To, the head of Cox and WSB TV..... Please.... PLEASE don't let Sinclair buy your station! Better yet...If you have to, THROW yourselves at Disney and become and ABC owned station before Sinclair grabs you. Say no to Sinclair, please!! As a viewer of your station.... PLEASE!

I can hear it now: "Here's Sports: The Braves game was rained out today and it's Nancy Pelosi's fault!" ;)
 
If Sinclair gets WSB, the sounds of budget cuts will echo like trees falling during a tornado. That place is going to be gutted.

There might even be cutbacks on Action News where they tell you three times to stay tuned for a story coming up, and once they show it, the actual time spent showing the story was less than half the time they spent telling you they were going to show it. /S
 
Heard this from a Meredith exec. ALL stations are up for sale...if the price is right. Something to remember.
 
If WSB gets sold, are they going to have to change call signs like WOR did when it was sold and became WWOR?
 
If WSB gets sold, are they going to have to change call signs like WOR did when it was sold and became WWOR?

Maybe. Lately there's been a willingness on the part of the seller to work a deal with the buyer over call letters. So when CBS sold their radio stations to Entercom, the radio stations got the use of the original call letters including WCBS and KCBS. Cumulus is still operating with legacy ABC call letters.
 
If WSB gets sold, are they going to have to change call signs like WOR did when it was sold and became WWOR?

No. When WWOR was sold, there was an FCC rule in place that licensees owned by two different entities could not share a call sign. That rule was repealed over 30 years ago.

Presuming that Cox would sell WSB, WSB-FM, and WSB-TV as a group, there's no reason I can see why Cox would object to the buyer using the call signs in perpetuity - unlike KCBS/WCBS, which obviously are important calls to CBS Corporation.

If the buyer only bought the WSB-TV assets, then there might be some discussion about one party or the other changing calls.
 
There's no such rule anymore, witness WBZ, WBZ-FM and WBZ-TV having separate owners. WSB--the AM station on 750--would still control the calls, and an agreement would have to be made to have them continue on WBZ-TV if the stations separated.
 
There's no such rule anymore, witness WBZ, WBZ-FM and WBZ-TV having separate owners. WSB--the AM station on 750--would still control the calls, and an agreement would have to be made to have them continue on WBZ-TV if the stations separated.

I'm not sure if any of the stations has the "rights" to the WSB calls over any of the others. The use of the calls after a sale would be determined in the terms of the sale.
 
As far as the FCC is concerned, the "base" call stays with the AM unless changed. If there's a dispute, it's a court issue, not an FCC issue.
 
Just a reminder that what Cox said is: "it plans to sell 14 TV stations across the country through mergers or a partnership with a large ownership group." This is primarily for tax reasons. A full sale would incur huge capital gain taxes.

So what they're looking to do is give up "some control." That means that Cox would still retain some ownership of those 14 stations. So any discussion about call letters is premature. Plus I really doubt that Cox would sell TV and become a radio-only company. That makes no sense at all.
 
As far as the FCC is concerned, the "base" call stays with the AM unless changed. If there's a dispute, it's a court issue, not an FCC issue.

My point is that any sale will include the usage of call letters in the contract(s). It won't get to the courts, and the matter before the FCC will simply be approving any actions required by seller and buyer(s).
 
Presuming that Cox would sell WSB, WSB-FM, and WSB-TV as a group, there's no reason I can see why Cox would object to the buyer using the call signs in perpetuity - unlike KCBS/WCBS, which obviously are important calls to CBS Corporation.

If the buyer only bought the WSB-TV assets, then there might be some discussion about one party or the other changing calls.

If the buyer only buys WSB-TV and isn’t willing to buy News 95.5 FM/AM 750 WSB-AM/WSBB-FM, severe weather coverage for radio listeners would be disastrous. Kirk Mellish would be let go due to his inability to be in studio all year round. WSB Radio would not have a plan B. They wouldn’t be able to outsource Severe Weather Team 2 anymore. I know that people can receive severe weather alerts via mobile devices these days but people still need a backup option if in the event they can’t turn on their TVs, computers, or mobile devices. My heart goes out to the Athens, GA people. News/talk station WGAU outsources their forecasts from TWC (The Weather Channel) Radio Network. That’s nice. But it’s no good if you can’t have the radio station break into programming when severe weather threatens. EAS alerts are not enough. Of course, WGAU is understaffed. No wonder they can’t get anyone to be there when severe weather threatens. I don’t want to be tuning into WSB Radio with them not breaking into programming for severe weather and then a tornado shows up 500-1000 ft. from my house and I either make it to the basement successfully or the tornado picks me up and throws me 100-300 ft. into the air. Thankfully it’s never happened to me and I’m also thankful it hasn’t happened to anyone who listens to WGST, WYAY, WGKA, WAOK, WGAU (Athens), WRGA (Rome), WRWH (Cleveland, GA), or WJRB (Young Harris-Blairsville, GA-Murphy, NC-Blue Ridge, GA). When WGST had more staff with them prior to 2006, they outsourced their forecasts from TWC Radio Network then the FOX5 Atlanta Storm Team. Back then, WGST broke into their programming when severe weather would hit the area. You would hear of them make reference to the Georgia Power Storm Center. In the last days before 2006, I remember them making reference to the Scana Energy Storm Center. I get it. Those power companies sponsored WGST’s then existing storm center. You would think New Talk 106.7 WYAY-FM would have learned from WGST’s severe weather coverage mistakes. But have they? Even after inheriting the outsourcing of forecasts from the FOX5 Atlanta Storm Team, no, they have not learned. When WGST let so many people go in 2006, they should have never done away with severe weather coverage. As far as outsourcing forecasts are concerned, WGST now outsources them from the CBS46 Pinpoint Weather Team. WGKA like WGAU is understaffed. WGKA outsources their forecasts from AccuWeather. News & Talk 1380 AM WAOK, a black news/talk station, I don’t know where they outsource their forecasts. I don’t even know if they even have a plan for severe weather coverage in place. If WAOK does not have a plan for severe weather coverage, they should consider putting one in place. Of course, WAOK is understaffed from what I could tell of their programming schedule. I never even tune into WAOK. They’re too liberal for me. Despite them being liberal, they should still put a severe weather coverage plan in place. Outsourcing CBS46 would be a good idea. WGST needs to outsource CBS46 for severe weather coverage as well. WRGA in Rome, IIRC (If I Remember Correctly), outsources their forecasts from AccuWeather. WRGA, WRWH, & WJRB are all understaffed. Community Radio 100.3 FM/AM 1450 WBHF-AM/W262CD-FM, a station that bills itself as an adult standards station in Cartersville, the way that station is ran, they should consider putting a severe weather coverage plan in place for that station. WBHF has a morning news show along with a midday news show that comes on around 12PM (12 Noon) 7 days a week. The morning news show is on 5 days a week (Mon.-Fri.). The midday news show is on for about 15 minutes every afternoon. WBHF outsources their forecasts from AccuWeather. Am I saying all news/talk stations should outsource TV stations with news departments for severe weather coverage? Absolutely not. The arrangement between WSB TV & Radio should NOT be broken up. WYAY needs to outsource the FOX5 Atlanta Storm Team for severe weather coverage. WGST & WAOK should outsource CBS46 for severe weather coverage for those respective stations. What’s my advice to WGKA, WGAU, WRGA, WRWH, WJRB, & WBHF? My advice to all those stations is to simply hire people who are willing to come in to do wall-to-wall severe weather coverage. No, they do not have to be meteorologists necessarily. They can be regular people who are willing to keep listeners in the know of severe weather alerts along with keeping a eye on the radar. Where WSB TV & Radio are concerned, if the buyer buys the TV station without the radio station, I would be more than willing to relieve Kirk Mellish when he can’t come in for WSB Radio so Kirk won’t be let go. As long as Kirk has someone to cover for him, Cox won’t let him go. I would be more than willing to cover for Kirk on holidays & weekends. My only problem is my education. I unfortunately never finished college. I don’t have degrees in broadcasting & meteorology. No, I am not going to send in a resume to Cox anytime soon because of the education thing. If people wind up dying from tornadoes as a result of this pending sale of WSB-TV no matter who buys the TV station, oh well. :( I don’t wish ill on anyone. May the WSB-TV sale end on a good note and not a bad note. I apologize for this post being so lengthy. Thank you guys for reading it. Anyway, that is all.
 
If the buyer only buys WSB-TV and isn’t willing to buy News 95.5 FM/AM 750 WSB-AM/WSBB-FM, severe weather coverage for radio listeners would be disastrous.

The reality is the companies bidding on Cox are not in radio. Scripps just sold all of their radio stations, so they're not going to go back into radio. Tegna and Hearst don't own radio. So radio will likely be spun off to a different company or companies.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom