Interestingly, KOMO tv arguably has one of the best newscasts in western Washington right now. They have some of the best graphics, best reporters, and trustworthy anchors. While other stations have had ups and downs in recent years, KOMO has demonstrated a pattern of consistency. Sure, Sinclair might promote content that many viewers will not agree with. With that being said, KOMO makes a strong effort to place this programming at off hours with heavy disclaimers. Not to mention, KOMO has been celebrated by multiple television talk show hosts for finding clever ways to appease Sinclair while still delivering trustworthy news. In my opinion, this is really not much different from a radio station that has to air infomercials for snake oil during the early morning or weekend. It’s not ideal, but they do what has to be done in order to maintain then integrity of their on air product (ie, a good business decision not to bite the hand that feeds them just to prove a point).The point being that Sinclair has different justification for how they program local news as opposed to every other major broadcast chain remaining. And like it or not, it is heavily polarizing by design and heavily political.
They’re more likely to sully the brand equity of KOMO than Lotus ever could have.
On the topic of Seattle is Dying. I’m sure that some people didn’t care for it. I actually started watching KOMO after the documentary aired, even though I had watched other stations before. In this sense, the documentary did what it was supposed to do. I’d find it hard to believe that most people who watch that documentary would be offended, especially when you consider that it was true to daily life downtown.