• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

SiriusXM Moving to XM Technology

Is SiriusXM slowly migrating only to the XM technology? I noticed on the siriusxm.com web site when searching for a radio, they are only showing XM radios. If so, why would they select XM over Sirius technology?

Is XM technology better than Sirius or is this because the XM radios can also receive the Sirius signal? Is this part of the requirement for the merger. Wikepedia stats, "As a term of the merger, the combined company will be fined almost $20 million for failing to create and market interchangeable radios capable of receiving signals from both companies prior to the merger".
 
jasper933 said:
Is SiriusXM slowly migrating only to the XM technology? I noticed on the siriusxm.com web site when searching for a radio, they are only showing XM radios. If so, why would they select XM over Sirius technology?

Is XM technology better than Sirius or is this because the XM radios can also receive the Sirius signal? Is this part of the requirement for the merger. Wikepedia stats, "As a term of the merger, the combined company will be fined almost $20 million for failing to create and market interchangeable radios capable of receiving signals from both companies prior to the merger".

Short answer, yes. The XM hardware and infrastructure is much superior to the Sirius systems. You may have noticed the new radios Sirius XM has been coming out with have been for XM signals, such as the XM Snap, XM Onyx, and the iPhone app/XM Skydock that turns it into a satellite receiver. The XM chipsets cannot decode the Sirius signal and vice versa, but that's not the reason the hardware is better. It's also not a merger requirement. The MiRGE radio fulfilled the requirement you listed.

Here's a bulletpoint list for why they would choose the XM infrastructure:

* XM uses an audio codec known as HE-AAC, or aacPlus v1. It's designed to deliver higher quality audio at bitrates lower than 96 kbps (192 kbps MP3). Sirius uses a less efficient codec called ePAC, which takes more data to deliver at the same quality as HE-AAC. XM also uses the AMBE codec for its voice only data channels, aka the robot voice channels, which uses a mere 4 kbps.

* XM's infrastructure has the ability to move bandwidth around at will, turning channels on and off as needed and turning bandwidth up and down. Sirius channels stay on all the time, unless they're permanently deleted. They find ways of preserving bandwidth using a system like Statmux, where a group of channels have varying bitrates based on what other channels need. Satellite TV uses this too.

* XM is able to alter the channel information on its units at the push of a keystroke. If a channel is replaced by a new one, they can simply change the channel name and logo on the units. Sirius is unable to do this without shutting down the entire system and rebooting it, which causes all units to go dark for a few minutes. For a while this was routine, but Sirius hasn't done a reboot for over two years now.

* While all XM units can receive all channels, many Sirius units have a limit of 135 channels, and this includes a LOT of OEM radios. This is why XM has been adding several Sirius channels to its platform but Sirius has hardly added any XM channels. Sirius has mainly added XM channels to its Best of XM premium package, which brings the platform total over the 135 channel barrier, so the limited Sirius units have simply been deemed Best of XM incompatible. This is also why the newest Sirius XM channel, Spice Radio, has a full time channel on XM while existing part time on Sirius, sharing channel space with Sirius XM Stars Too.
 
livingfruitvirus said:
While all XM units can receive all channels, many Sirius units have a limit of 135 channels, and this includes a LOT of OEM radios. This is why XM has been adding several Sirius channels to its platform but Sirius has hardly added any XM channels.

Right now Sirius is sitting at 134 channels without the Best of XM. I guess this means if I buy any new radios they will be from the XM side. Now if they would just combine their billing system it would make that conversion so much more simplistic.
 
ROBGv1 said:
I think SiriusXM should have there in house channels on the same channels.


Under the merger rules they agreed to, I don't think that's allowed....the only 2 channels that have the same number are the NFL and NASCAR channels, and those are "Best of Sirius" channels on XM, so that might be a loophole.
 
I'd like to see the article that says sirius/xm is switching to xm radio technology only.
Ps.Cant wait to hear that shhhhhhhh sound when i go under a bridge or put the shixties on 6 on.
Xm sounds like garbage at least sirius is clear although its on the bassy side,but sometimes thats good.
Dont get me wrong sirius has its artifacts too but not as annoying.
 
Mainedude2007 said:
Under the merger rules they agreed to, I don't think that's allowed....
What possible reason could there be for not simplifying things?
The decades channels, Watercolors, BB King's Bluesville, Radio Disney, Kids Place Live, NPR Now.
 
I'm still from the school that Melvin announces that in 2 years all XM radios will be HQ music only and Sirius will be Talk & Sports only. Then take the Mirge out of mothballs and make a for-real radio that decodes both versions. Also, XM could upgrade its audio dramatically, but old radios would be mono; but mono without shhhhhhs and sibilance and better audio all-around would be acceptable for the original SkyFi (1) if it meant better stereo steering at lower bitrates for everybody else.
Mel & company have not big picture skills on how to improve their service(s).

I still think SiriusXM 2.0 is vaporware, not yet invented and a bunch of hotair and lies from New York City. I'd even bet money on it in Vegas.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom