BobOnTheJob said:hipporadio said:Audio quality is well-beyond what ANY of you here have casually experienced on AM... It REALLY is AWESOME as AM stations are judged in the current broadcast world!
Thank You - Thank You - Thank You hipporadio. As the engineer who set up WIFE's audio on my workbench before placing it on the air, the compliment regarding WIFE made my day.
Sooo... YOU’RE THE ONE! Honestly, and I mean no disservice to the Jim Lupas’ of this world—1580 WIFE currently has damn near THE FINEST AUDIO I have heard on AM radio... And what an irony at 250-watts!
Here is my roster of above-average to exceptional AM radios I have had the pleasure to listen to them on:
* Carver TX-11b (circa 1987): C-QUAM stereo, switch-able NRSC, ultra-low distortion synchronous detection with dual bandwidths (the narrowest is about 8k with a gentle skirt). It is impractical (and nearly-unusable) nowadays, but within a few miles of their TX, WIFE sounds NO DIFFERENT than a well-done mono FM... I actually have to DECREASE the treble when listening! In the “wide” (15kHz) I.F. setting—there isn’t a hint of “above-band trash” in their signal (but little audio improvement due to the NRSC mask). Today, this tuner is hooked to a McKay-Dymek tuned active antenna with a foot-long ferrite bar, and resides with a Shoutcast server on a T-1 VPN at my brother’s business there. I stream WIFE at 64kbps mp3 mono so I can enjoy a very good oldies station here in Charleston.
* Denon’s (circa 1990) FM stereo/AMax (mono) tuner with a maximum bandwidth that descends to the NRSC cutoff beginning at about 7.5kHz. WIFE actually sounds most pristine on this one—no EQ twiddling required—and the bass is better due to no C-QUAM pilot filter roll-off.
* Icom’s R-71A AM/SWL receiver with an accessory Collins 16kHz (tight skirt) band-pass filter (8kHz audio). I actually prefer listening on this "bad boy" because of the slight detector-induced distortion... Those late-60s “garage and frat-house bands” seem to sound more authentic with a bit of “AM grit” added in!
* On three more common AM-friendly radios—The C. Crane, Sangean’s WR-2, and Tivoli’s “Kloss” Model One “heritage” analog-tuned table model—WIFE sounds AWESOME. If the latter three radios were in greater public population, I can find NO SANE REASON why an Oldies fan could not appreciate the format on a well-engineered AM station!
I was also in the WDJO transmitter building last week and Rodger Kay allowed me to fiddle with the WDJO sound. After being spoiled with WIFE's sound, I felt WDJO sounded awesome but could use some more upper high end.
What a FINE SURVIVING EXAMPLE of RADIO! I agree with your audio diagnosis there. I heard them in April ’06 on I-275 in a rented Chrysler product with above-average AM. They sound very good, but a tad lacking in the area you noted. You have your ear on the critical stuff. Last Labor Day weekend, we had a family reunion at a resort about half-way up Brookville Lake. That’s about equal-signal territory for WIFE vs. WDJO. I toted the Tivoli to our overnight accommodations and compared the two... ‘Guess which station won the prize for “best audio”? WIFE—by a mile!
Again...thanks for the kind words. Not every day the engineering department gets acknowledgement!
You deserve every one, Bob! Seems most engineers only get their due credit when something blows up—and they fix the problem before the next scheduled spot break
P.S. WIFE needs to apply about 30% of your on-air audio magic to their internet stream... It's good, but could kick a little more tail