Big Ed Trefzger said:
All they need to do is scrape a point or so from WBEE to help keep WHAM #1 in the market.
Yes, true... but this assumes (uh-oh) or perhaps PRE-zooms WBEE stays flat or goes down... It's a fair presumption.... but we know about ass-sooming... the Bee is a monster station and could just as easily go up... maybe WAY up... leaving 107.3 to wither like a dried dog turd on Arizona asphalt in August.
And in other news...
I just want to set the record straight, Niner. WGR never "smacked" WNSA. The two stations were pretty even ratings wise until the end of WNSA's run when WGR started to build a lead. But at its height, when the Sabres made the playoffs in 2001, WNSA actually beat WGR with a 3.1 share 12+. As I recall, WGR was in the mid two share range for much of the time it competed against WNSA. So, no, WGR did not "smack" WNSA. In fact, I would submit that WNSA was the superior sports station. With Doug Young as their producer, WNSA hosts had consistently more interesting interviews with top sports figures while WGR was talking urinal pads. And let's note here that two out of the three top hosts at WGR today (Howard Simon and Mike Schopp) came from WNSA. And the third guy, Bulldog, earned his reputation at what was then rival WBEN. Entercom should thank it's lucky stars that Adelphia tanked, sealing the fate of WNSA. One can't assume the Sabres would be as successful under the Rigases as they are now under Golisano. But imagine if today's Sabres were still on WNSA. I think it would be a much different scenario with WGR on the losing side.
Y'know, you make a good point here about the stations being evenly matched mounds of mediocrity at one point in their mano a mano days. The difference was WNSA had the Buffalo Sabres. But that didn't make WNSA the better station because it
wasn't the better station... it simply had the Sabres. Take a look at the dayparts, if you have access. Truth be told, both WGR and WNSA sucked. Yes, at times, each had moments of brilliance... well, maybe adequacy... but they were both mediocre.
As to WGR present, you could make the same argument for it being an especially mediocre station made better by the Sabres who have been on an amazing roll the last two seasons. As we've seen, a hometown hockey team in the playoffs tends to pump up the Spring numbers which normally would be mediocre.
Sure, Howard Simon's a knowledgeable guy, well-respected and well-liked. But he's teamed with the brilliance of Jeremy White, which rubs some people the wrong way.
And Schopp and the Bulldog? Mr. Mensa long ago became a tiresome caricature... oh yes, he's soooo smart! The lovable-but-stuttering former pizza delivery guy is a regular Joe and hard to dislike, but listening to him attempting to make a point or present his case is an exercise in exasperation.
WNSA, aside from the Sabres, was a very poorly programmed (sports) radio station. That weekend when programing genius Bob Kocinsky decided to take the station Sports-Rock really stole shares from 97 Rock and WGR... killed two birds with one stone. Brilliant move! (Sorry. I should have inserted the <sarcasm> tag a few paragraphs earlier. My apologies.)
Entercom doesn't have to thank anybody for anything. Shrewd manipulators. They actually did what any other business would do, that is, pick up the worthwhile players of a failed station and buy the assets of the bankrupt company.
We all know Adelphia imploded, lead by the Rigas Crooks who were caught with their hands in the piggy bank. What's particularly sad is the Rigas clan cost a lot of decent radio people (even the ones I've criticized here... I may not like their shtick, but they are, afterall, decent) their livelihoods.
Now, aside from all this sturm and drang, I contend (with some misgiving) that WGR was a better radio station during the WNSA-WGR contest. It was programmed for sports dorks and guys in particular. WNSA was programmed for sports
afficianados who wanted to talk about statistics as "educated sports fans."
I'm not advocating LCD (lowest common denominator, not liquid crystal diode) programming, but sports ain't NPR.
Still, you made some good points, Phil, and I enjoy your posts. Let's play two!
-good ol' 9-