Re: think about it
> > I'm not gonna go into how much it annoys me that clients
> buy
> > radio for the wrong reasons or that they expect something
> > extra (ie concert tix)just because they did a media buy,
> but
> > how 'bout how successful these annoying commercials were.
> > How much money did these "lesser" quality commercials
> make?
> > I'm told Jacob Kurlancheeks actually lost money when they
> > dropped Jim Ward during his heyday. Tommy Van Scoy, the
> > Carvel guy, Little Bobby on the Valley Chevrolet spots,
> the
> > Pet Supply Plus guys, they all may be lesser quality to
> > some, but they work. Sometimes people over analyze
> things.
> >
> You are totally correct. Let me tell you a quick Jim Ward
> story. His mantra was to run one spot every hour for 12
> hours,
> 7 days a week or 7 days right before the big event or sale.
>
> 7a to 7p. It worked like a charm. In the late 90s when I was
> at
> Citadel, a consultant comes in with a program called ASMP.
> (Audience Scheduling Maximum Potential). He had all type of
> charts and graphs, you name it. Bottom line, he proposed
> that we sell advertiers on one spot per hour, 12 hours a
> day,
> 7 days a week. Jim just never charged $5,000 seminar fees or
>
> had a name for it.
> As for the corny commercials........they drive people to
> the business. And even if someone says, "I hate that
> commercial",
> nine times out of ten they can name the product, tell you
> where
> the store is and might even be a customer.
> yonkstur
>
God rest his soul, and I'm sure he was a nice man, but those Jim Ward spots were a turn off to listeners. They were screaming, cheesy, low rent rants that appealed only to low socio economic groups and reinforced the huckster image this business is known for. Yes, I'm sure the listeners knew all Jim's accounts, and I'm sure some stayed away because of the screaming. The reason a lot of them went with Jim is he was cheap.