You are so right Bob. I know you've made the argument before about the convenience of radio. Yes, there's something to be said about a technology that requires a simple touch of the "on" button. Some days, I just don't feel like loading the CD deck or firing up the computer and then waiting for a web page to load to listen to an Internet station or for my podcasts to download. Both take some semblance of work and time. This past week, I've found myself tuning into WNED-FM when sitting down with a good book and a glass of wine. And that gets to Bob's second point. You need good content. I was listening to Bill Raffel on Saturday morning. He's knowledgeable. He's conversational. I learned something about a music style that I'm not too familiar with. It was an enjoyable listening experience. That gives me hope about radio's future.
Then, this morning I was hit with something else. I was getting a blood test at a local Quest. The technician had WJJL on. WJJL?!?!?! She told me she likes '50s and '60s music, and there is nowhere else to get it. This woman is 50. She doesn't get her music from the Internet, and probably never will. I would assume she doesn't own an iPod. If she lives another 30 years, which is likely, she'll be listening to the radio. That's a long time! And as has been talked about on this board, there's a market for a well done oldies format. Now, because our industry is so focused on 18-49 and 25-54, we're told this listener doesn't matter. But I don't think she's alone. Radio in its present form will live on for another 20 to 30 years because there is a large portion of the population who grew up with it, are comfortable with it and will stay with it, despite what the corporate honchos have done through the years to dilute the product.
Please know I'm not saying that we shouldn't be paying attention to what's happening among younger people and the technology they're gravitating to. Radio will have to evolve if it's to continue when we're all dead and gone. Heck, I own an iPod, and I listen to a significant number of podcasts each week produced by CNN, public radio and even Slate magazine. But I still listen to the radio whether it's WGR's Bills coverage or an extremely well-done, intelligent presentation of "This American Life" like I heard this weekend on WBFO.
I really don't know where I'm going with this other than to say there's still time for radio execs to get it right. Radio isn't dead, and it's not necessarily dying.
Then, this morning I was hit with something else. I was getting a blood test at a local Quest. The technician had WJJL on. WJJL?!?!?! She told me she likes '50s and '60s music, and there is nowhere else to get it. This woman is 50. She doesn't get her music from the Internet, and probably never will. I would assume she doesn't own an iPod. If she lives another 30 years, which is likely, she'll be listening to the radio. That's a long time! And as has been talked about on this board, there's a market for a well done oldies format. Now, because our industry is so focused on 18-49 and 25-54, we're told this listener doesn't matter. But I don't think she's alone. Radio in its present form will live on for another 20 to 30 years because there is a large portion of the population who grew up with it, are comfortable with it and will stay with it, despite what the corporate honchos have done through the years to dilute the product.
Please know I'm not saying that we shouldn't be paying attention to what's happening among younger people and the technology they're gravitating to. Radio will have to evolve if it's to continue when we're all dead and gone. Heck, I own an iPod, and I listen to a significant number of podcasts each week produced by CNN, public radio and even Slate magazine. But I still listen to the radio whether it's WGR's Bills coverage or an extremely well-done, intelligent presentation of "This American Life" like I heard this weekend on WBFO.
I really don't know where I'm going with this other than to say there's still time for radio execs to get it right. Radio isn't dead, and it's not necessarily dying.