S
searadiofreak
Guest
TexasTom said:formeraa said:I guess it is pretty funny when you think about it. It is pretty surprising that "Q-13" isn't "FOX 13"!Then, they could add all the colorful, noisy graphics between every story like FOX 10 does here in Phoenix. Half the time, the anchors forget about it and end up trying to talk over the graphics -- stopping in mid-sentence...
A couple of points about the "Q-13" on-air branding...
When KCPQ-TV channel 13 returned to commercial operation in 1980, they launched with the "Q-13" identity, so they were using it for quite a few years before they became a Fox affiliate.
And while many markets have seen station branding subsequently aligned with the national networks, the Seattle/Tacoma market is an exception. So far as I'm aware, none of the big four network affiliates in that market use their network identities in their primary on air branding, instead preferring to brand with their call letters -- "KOMO 4" instead of "ABC 4", "KING 5" (with a crown on the 5) instead of "NBC 5", "KIRO 7" instead of "CBS 7", and (of course) "Q-13" instead of "Fox 13".
The only stations to use network branding are KSTW as "CW 11" and KMYQ as "My Q2". The branding may represent the independent streak of the Pacific Northwest, or may simply reflect the fact that the only O&O in the market is the CW station (KSTW).
I think that is a good assessment. Seattle was an early affiliate market, especially with KING (NBC) in the late 40's. Yes, the market has an independent streak, but it also has had more time to digest the original call letters, KING, KOMO, and KIRO. I would guess that most in that market still identify with the calls more than the channel number and/or network. (Even though KIRO lost CBS to KSTW for a time in the 90's, but soon got it back). This is good for the locals, not so good for the networks. Regardless, Seattle is one of the few markets where the calls are still prominently mentioned, as opposed to the network or channel position. There are other markets that still maintain call letter presence, but they are becoming fewer and fewer. Seattle is unique in this regard. Could be geographic, but more likely due to history, longevity, and viewer habits. We shall see if this continues, or whether Seattle falls in with the rest of local TV around the country. For now, it is nice to see some orginality in local tv news branding, and you still get that in Seattle!