• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

SoundExchange Lawsuit

I was wondering how long it would take for this to happen.

http://www.radio-info.com/news/sirius-xm-sues-soundexchange-alleging-an-illegal-boycott


More than five years ago, I said that SoundExchange was an illegal monopoly. That digital radio operators had no choice but to pay them for music use. It had come close to bankrupting Pandora and Sirius, and has limited the growth of internet radio. Because SoundExchange is part of the RIAA, it is in collusion with the major labels. It took Mel Karmazan to do this, because Tim Westergrin couldn't. But he knows this is true.

Broadcast radio pays royalties to three independent licensing agencies. The PROs compete among themselves for clients, and broadcasters can negotiate with them in a competitive marketplace, without input from the Copyright Royalty Board. It's a system that has worked well for almost 90 years. Everyone makes money. Lots of money. No one is beholden to anyone. The labels could have worked with BMI and ASCAP to include them in the radio royalties.

But the record labels wanted to control everything. They wanted to punish broadcasters, and hold them hostage, keep them in poverty and make them beg for music. Then they created a campaign to turn broadcasters into the bad guys, saying they wanted music for free, ignoring the fact that broadcasters already pay a performance royalty. The digital performance royalty is ten times what songwriters get, which is unfair to the songwriters, and demonstrates the fact that the digital system is broken.

It's time for a judge to intervene in this system, because Congress screwed it up, and no one can fix it. Until they do, no one will be able to make money in digital broadcasting.
 
Good question and how does a 'talk' station help a music industry when it excludes it'self from promoting music|?|
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom