• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Sponsor Identification and Endorsements: FCC and FTC

davideduardo

Moderator/Administrator
Staff member
One of my favorite blogs is the one that FCC attorney Davied Oxenford writes. Today he published a piece about sponsor ID and product endorsements and the FCC and FTC rulings and rules.

"Broadcasters are familiar with the FCC requirements for the identification of those who provide something of value to a station in exchange for any on-air content. Fines can be issued (and big payments under consent decrees have resulted see, for instance, the cases we noted here and here) from broadcasters who do not follow the FCC’s sponsorship identification rules. But broadcasters are not as familiar with the fact that the FTC also has rules about sponsorship identification requirements that go beyond the FCC’s obligations, looking at questions including the truthfulness of endorsements and testimonials for products and services. FTC enforcement can be as severe, if not more severe, than that of the FCC (see, for instance, the FTC’s fines we wrote about two years ago on Google and a broadcaster for having DJs talk about their use of Pixel phones that they had not in fact used). The FTC last week expanded on its policies by adopting a final rule prohibiting the purchase and sale of fake reviews and testimonials concerning products and services, and allowing the agency to seek civil penalties against knowing violators. Among other things, the new rule prohibits activities including the buying or selling of fake consumer reviews or testimonials, buying positive or negative consumer reviews, using certain insiders to create consumer reviews or testimonials without clearly disclosing their relationships, creating a company-controlled review website that falsely purports to provide independent reviews, using certain review suppression practices, and selling or purchasing fake indicators of social media influence. We plan to write more about this FTC decision in the near future, but it is important to note that these FTC policies apply with equal force to podcasters and any other online communications medium."

Much more at Podcasters and Broadcasters – Disclose Those Sponsors!

The blog is free and you can register to receive interesting and concise (and ad free) update notices at that site.
 
One of my favorite blogs is the one that FCC attorney Davied Oxenford writes. Today he published a piece about sponsor ID and product endorsements and the FCC and FTC rulings and rules.
It seems to be increasing in use over the past five years, where talent testimonial (spots) about products or services are on the rise, especially when it comes to podcasts. I've wondered how many of these paid endorsements are real, or just reading copy. Recent examples heard on more than one of my podcasts include mattresses that one or more of the hosts supposedly use, breakfast cereal, food/cooking delivery services, etc. I've never heard any sort of disclosure from these ads during a podcast that the endorsements are paid.
Morning network TV shows have created these 'third hour' blocks that are nothing more than one giant series of product endorsements/reviews/ads . At least with QVC, it's common knowledge what you're watching is to sell products. These 'third hours' are just like QVC, but appear as a continuation of Today, or coming soon, a similar 'third hour' of CBS Mornings.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom