I think the point, which obviously went over your head, was that your only posts related to WNML have been to criticize John Knowles. This makes at least 4 or 5 different posts where you have beaten the same dead horse. Did Knowles steal your girlfriend at some point in the past? That's how you come across.
> > It's obvious that this guy has a personal agenda regarding
>
> > John. It's time to start considering the source.
> >
> >
> > > > Looks like the sports animal has no worries about who
> > host
> > >
> > > > their show,even their producer is gonna give it a
> > > > shot...Seems like Jacoby and Dearstone had to
> > > > take off on the same week(how does that happen?)so
> their
> >
> > > > gonna let their producer do the morning show!...Should
>
> > be
> > > > very interesting,though we've heard that he'll have
> some
> >
> > > > "guests" with him...maybe it'll be worth a listen..Not
>
> > > sure
> > > > when this will take place,probably last week in March
> or
> >
> > > > first of April..
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't see what the story is here, John Knowles is
> > already
> > > a pretty big and vocal part of the show on a daily
> basis.
> >
> > >
> > > I believe the timeframe you're referring to will be when
>
> > > Jacoby is doing some UT baseball games and Mickey is
> > > planning on being in Boston with the Lady vols for the
> > Final
> > > Four.
> > >
> > > Again, I think you're making a much bigger deal out of
> > this
>
> Consider this...How serious can you be about your new
> station when you let your
> producer host the show for a week while the other guys are
> off...Thats all I'm saying,he may do a fine job...we'll
> see...I really don't give a crap what you or anybody else
> has to say about me.."the source"...I'll keep on posting my
> thoughts on things,and could care less what you have to say
> Mr. Ranch...and I guess you must either work with John or be
> related,or hell,you might even be the
> great John....whatever...
> > > than it really is. It's not like the guy has never been
> > > on-air before.
> > >
> >
>