ok walters said:
The statement that was made was that a price war was going on and there was a mention of $2 spots being sold on the AMs, and how ridiculous that was. My question was why is that ridiculous when there are so many stations and not that many listeners to go around. Then you came across with "they will sell it for whatever someone will pay" and "I used to", than nothing specific.
This is an excellent question worth answering.
Fact:
Basic supply and demand dictates price on everything including radio advertising inventory. My answer was very specific and detailed in that it addressed that supply and demand question although I did not give a detailed or specific rate. As for whether or not a single unit rate is worth $2.00 or another figure, the market will determine that price. That is a specific, direct and detailed fact. Of course, the station can ask for any rate management chooses, but if the market is not willing to pay the asking rate, for example $10 per 30 second unit, then a lower rate is necessary to increase the likelihood of making the sale. If $2.00 per rate is what the market is willing to pay and said rate is paying the bills, that is all that really matters at the end of the day.
Fact:
The majority of the information I included in my previous comment had more to do with answering your other question relating to an advertiser stating that radio does not work. That was in relation to your comment about an advertiser paying a higher rate but not getting the desired results. Since that is a common objection, I offered what I believe to be the most common reason the advertising did not work for the client - passive ads, too short of an ad campaign run or both. I used myself as an example because I know my own strengths and weaknesses and what has worked for me and what has not worked so well. I do not know your ability or anyone else's so it is pointless for me to second guess another sales person's ability whom I have never met and do not know. On the other hand, if I work with a person long enough, I will soon learn that person's strengths and weaknesses.
As for what I believe the rate should be for a Saint Augustine AM station, I will address that below.
ok walters said:
I would say in the current unusual market situation in SA, in the summer time in Florida, with all of the issues the posters claim the stations are having with production, the on and off history of some of them, along with most of the Jacksonville stations having pretty good signals into the area, how much more than $2 could they get for more than one contract right now? How many listeners could any one of those stations have?
All I can say here is this is an excellent observation that hits the metaphoric nail on the metaphoric head, and I could not have expressed it better myself. You put a great deal of thought into this.
ok walters said:
How much is that small audience worth per spot? More than $2? I don't have the audience numbers (and neither do they I would imagine), but I wouldn't think so.
Fact:
The above italic bold quote from you is exactly the reason I did not quote a specific rate. Same as with you by your own admission, I do not have those specific details at my disposal to make a definite determination on how the rate schedule or rate card should be structured. If either of us were actively working the Saint Augustine market, we would both have a much clearer idea what the rate should be. If $2.00 is determined to be the highest and best rate, then there is the answer regarding rate.
ok walters said:
The debate then became about the effect of pricing something below what it was "worth", as the poster called it. My question was how much could it be "worth" with all of the above factors?
Now tell us what you think they would be worth, and give us some specifics.
Please refer to the specifics found in the above paragraphs.