• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Stephanopoulos to GMA

Any thoughts?
I don't think George is the right fit for the high degree of "fluff" on GMA.
That said,I read where they might be trying to make it a more credible news-related show. That is something I'd love to see. I'm glad Robin Roberts is still on. Good riddance to Diane Sawyer though.
 
1069_KIFR said:
Does [George] relinquish his duties of 'This Week' or is he going to be a 6 day a week employee?

From what I read, they're looking for a new host for "TW" - speculation is Terry Moran or even Jake Tapper is the odds-on favorite. In the interim, George will continue hosting "TW" until a replacement is named. George even went on record as saying he really wouldn't want to leave "TW" in the first place.
 
recto101 said:
George Stephanopoulos is more of a guy who fits on World News than on GMA.

He would have been one of my choices to replace Charlie Gibson instead of the former beauty queen.

There is no way in hell I'm going to waste a 1/2 hour of my life each weekday night watching Diane Sawyer.

If I want fluff, I can switch over to CBS or all three of the cable news networks.

I guess I'm stuck with either the BBC or PBS.
 
Agreed on the fact that George carries more of an identity of news and politics than fluff. I just don't see the logic of bringing him to "GMA" instead of leaving him in the news department to flourish. That's just like bringing in Al Roker to host a morning show on The Weather Channel.
 
DToTheJ said:
Agreed on the fact that George carries more of an identity of news and politics than fluff. I just don't see the logic of bringing him to "GMA" instead of leaving him in the news department to flourish. That's just like bringing in Al Roker to host a morning show on The Weather Channel.

Ha!!!!
:D
 
Spencer Christian of KGO-TV should have been considered host of GMA. He did the weather for GMA in the early 1990's before he came here to KGO. Stephanopoulos should be on World News instead.
 
I think he is fluff. He is a horrible news reader. He had no talent as an anchorman his delivery is stiff and smug.

He got where he was because he was a goodlooking guy when he was young. He has talent for what he did with the Clinton campaign, but had he been ugly, he never would've went anywhere else.

He's acceptable as a poltical commentator, but on World News Tonight? No way. He's just has no talent as an achor. Especially since there are so many others who have talent and could do the job. David Muhr for instance is much better. His delivery is comfortable and he has the journo background.

I say send him to GMA and let the housewives swoon about "how cute he is," (or was) :)
 
The McGee/Walters pairing on "Today" never really jelled;
after McGee's death Jim Hartz (who?) replaced him, the
ratings went down even more, and paved the way for ABC
to introduce what would become "Good Morning America"
(NBC had to pair Tom Brokaw and Jane Pauley to get "Today"'s
ratings back up).

But Brokaw's one of the rare people who can go fluff ("Today")
or straight ("Nightly News"). Stephanopoulos, IMHO, is not.
He has substitute-anchored "World News" many times and I think
he would have been a credible choice (I also thought John Roberts
should have had Dan Rather's job), but I agree with those of you
who think he's not capable of doing fluff.

However, the deed is done. My opinion is that Diane can make the
transition from morning-fluff to evening-substance better than Katie
did (Diane, too, has substitute-anchored ABC's newscast) but I'm not
crazy about either one of them, and something about Brian Williams rubs
me the wrong way, although I'm not sure what.

Charlie Gibson will be missed in my house.

Brokaw, Jennings, and Rather were probably the last great anchor triad,
but boy, I miss the days of Cronkite, Chancellor, and Smith/Reasoner.

Wolf Blitzer may be about to gain a new viewer out of desperation.
 
bpatrick said:
Wolf Blitzer may be about to gain a new viewer out of desperation.

Actually, the reason why such hires of the likes of Diane Sawyer and Katie Couric are made to anchor network news is exactly because the model is in danger of being obsolete, struggling in the shadow of the Wolf Blitzers and Chris Matthews and Bret Baiers on cable news at that hour. One may call them desperation moves; I call it survival.
 
I'm not talking desperation on the part of ABC, CBS, and NBC,
although I think two of them (ABC and CBS) are trying to transpose
some of their morning viewers to the evening. I'm talking about my
own desperation at trying to find somebody to watch at 6:30, since
I'm not taken with any of the three "big-network" anchors.
 
DToTheJ said:
bpatrick said:
Wolf Blitzer may be about to gain a new viewer out of desperation.

Actually, the reason why such hires of the likes of Diane Sawyer and Katie Couric are made to anchor network news is exactly because the model is in danger of being obsolete, struggling in the shadow of the Wolf Blitzers and Chris Matthews and Bret Baiers on cable news at that hour. One may call them desperation moves; I call it survival.

Personally, I'd rather go without than watch Wolf Blitzer.
 
DToTheJ said:
Actually, the reason why such hires of the likes of Diane Sawyer and Katie Couric are made to anchor network news is exactly because the model is in danger of being obsolete, struggling in the shadow of the Wolf Blitzers and Chris Matthews and Bret Baiers on cable news at that hour. One may call them desperation moves; I call it survival.

Great quote from the director of USC's Norman Lear Center (and a journalism professor): "More people go to the bathroom during the commercial break on network evening news than are watching cable news." It does help keep some perspective, and cut through the hype and declarations that aren't backed up by facts.
 
DToTheJ said:
That's just like bringing in Al Roker to host a morning show on The Weather Channel.

At least, Al has years and years of experience in WEATHER, which hopefully is what the Weather Channel does (between the movies and the endless storm story reruns). George has a few years of experience as a moderator, not a morning show host.
 
Point taken; however, from what I understand, Roker is doing the same kind of fluff pieces on The Weather Channel that Stephy is expected to do on "GMA" starting next year.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom