radiogodzilla said:
Nate Wesley is slightly brighter than Realdeal and obviously is not JT. He's apparantly some hip hop or Steven A Smith pal who doesn't know what he is talking about. Smith has never had to get up at 4am and try to do a morning show except his fill-ins. I read Bruno bolted Fox after building that network when they tried to undercut him and bring in Van Earl Wright to replace him. DISASTROUS move and Fox has suffered in that slot ever since. He got Fox Philly, SF and major markets they didn't have before or after he left.
Sporting News used him to help sell that sinking ship and he got them affiliates and advertisers they didn't have before or after his departure. Dan Patrick benefited the most when they found a way to get rid of him and not offer him a new contract.
He also helped start and build 610 WIP in Philly's morning drive show into the most successful sports talk show in the US.
I'd say that a proven record of morning drive success. So Mr Wesley, perhaps you should do some research before spouting nonsense on this board.
First I'm not 'Realdeal' or 'JT' or some pal of SAS, who I actually would have liked to
slap for his takes on the Rush Limbaugh/St. Louis Rams controversy. (No Stephen A, not all NFL players would blindly take money from a known racist, and the 'bidding war' example you used just doesn't happen in common NFL contract negotiations.)
Second...
I did do my research, godzilla. You can bring up Tony Bruno's local radio successes if you want to, but I think the discussion centers on national radio shows. At ESPN, at Fox Sports, at Sporting News: A 'proven talent' pushed out, fired, removed, eliminated, erased, 86'ed, whatever you want to call it--Tony Bruno never stayed very long on any of his national morning shows. You can't call SAS a failure for one radio show and call Bruno's (who's failed at THREE such shows) a success! Bruno's had a steadier stint being the fake sports radio host on old versions Madden NFL!
radiogodzilla said:
Smith's hire is a money saving move for Clear Channel and a desperate attempt to get clearances in markets like Philly, New York and Chicago which he will not be able to deliver(as noted in previous posts)
His chances of winning are as good as the equally annoying and narrowcast "2 LiveStews" who were so unappealing to affiliates they were dropped by the Urban syndicator who put them on and then picked up for nothing by a dying Sporting News to get a few 2nd rate markets to clear the Atlanta based show. I like what they do, but you need to sell and affiliate to succeed and they simply just give those smaller market stations without the ESPN or Fox option something to carry over the option of hiring dismal local talent.
So which is it--are the Stews 'equally annoying' or do you really 'like what they do'? Can't be both!
Back on topic--how dare you accuse me of not doing any research! Sporting News Radio is a
bigger syndicator than Syndication One (the former syndication arm of Radio One, who now syndicates Al Sharpton and Warren Ballentine's national shows in-house). The 'dying' SNR does quite well through Sirius XM and online listening, and it's the overnight provider for Boston's new CBS-owned FM sports talker. The Stews' have more national clearances through SNR than they ever did with Radio One, and they're the only SNR show/talent to keep an on-air relationship with ESPN television-- pretty good for a 'narrowcast' show.
You and others keep spouting out mis-informed declaratives for a SAS morning show that hasn't even debuted yet. Let's face it: If Steve Czaban or Tony Bruno were merely half as successful as 'Mike & Mike' or a national morning show with similar appeal, FSR would have little reason to canned them. They've gone and are going in different directions because they haven't cut the mustard. They're taking a big chance on Smith 'maybe' because he works cheap--but maybe they want someone polarizing enough to get some damn ratings too!