• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Steven W. Blood Scam

S

Sheriff Andy

Just in case anyone was curious as to what Sir Scam-a-lot/Woody Nelson/Steven Blood is currently up to...
It appears that Steven Blood is ditching his "Woody Nelson" moniker and is using his real name.
He's now promoting himself as a screenwriter(!!!) with something called "Double Shot the Movie".
http://www.facebook.com/DoubleShotMovie?sk=info
Does anyone, outside of a 14 year old, have the time this guy does to create so many Facebook and Twitter pages about.....nothing?
The funny thing is he thinks he know what he's talking about. Once again, no experience in broadcasting, nor any real job at all.
 
What is this Facebook y'all are speaking of? I don't post my face on the internet. I'm afraid it might scare the kids.
 
kenglish said:
Does he drive a tow truck?
Click to expand...

Not unless his Mom has one he can use.
Or maybe it's his latest "movie" title, "Tow Truck: The Movie". He's currently taking up more Facebook pages claiming he's currently in "pre-production" for about 20 or 30 titles.
No more claims about WSBX being on the air as the FCC is not amused from what I've heard. Quite a few people are petitioning the FCC to drop some serious fines on his Mom for all the falsified paperwork her sonny boy, Steven, has been forging, etc.
I think someone previously mused about the Bloods being some sort of gypsy org. Hard to refute that!
 
... No more claims about WSBX being on the air as the FCC is not amused from what I've heard. . Quite a few people are petitioning the FCC to drop some serious fines on his Mom for all the falsified paperwork her sonny boy, Steven, has been forging, etc. ...
Click to expand...

Where have you heard this, Sheriff Andy? Please cite for the a source of these assertions. I can see this as a possible outcome of the wsbx saga, but I can find no mention of possible FCC sanctions against the licensee anywhere.
 
Witchlover said:
... No more claims about WSBX being on the air as the FCC is not amused from what I've heard. . Quite a few people are petitioning the FCC to drop some serious fines on his Mom for all the falsified paperwork her sonny boy, Steven, has been forging, etc. ...
Click to expand...

Where have you heard this, Sheriff Andy? Please cite for the a source of these assertions. I can see this as a possible outcome of the wsbx saga, but I can find no mention of possible FCC sanctions against the licensee anywhere.
Click to expand...

Perhaps Sheriff Andy can get that information from Deputy Barney Fife...
 
My poor typing aside, there is no love lost between me & Woody; but I demand for him the same consideration I would demand for Ag Witchlover: If one states something as a fact, back it up with a citation; otherwise, state that it is an opinion. Are Woody's detractors sinking to the very level thither they believe Woody has descended? When were these petitions filed, and who are the complaining parties? Who has averred that any paperwork has been falsified, and upon what do they base this assertion? As another famous law enforcer might put it: Just the facts, ma'am.
 
Has anyone taken a look at WSBX's license renewal app? I would characterize some of the statements in that application as "Interesting".

The implication is that the station station "is" or "was" on the air when the app was filed. No employees other than a contract engineer.
 
HGR1290 said:
Has anyone taken a look at WSBX's license renewal app? I would characterize some of the statements in that application as "Interesting".

The implication is that the station station "is" or "was" on the air when the app was filed. No employees other than a contract engineer.
Click to expand...

One of the folks that were ripped off by Steven Blood's fraudulent scams is in contact with the FCC regarding the bogus claims Blood has made on various FCC documents as outlined on this Facebook post - here:
http://www.facebook.com/StormAid
This in addition to the copyright infringements on his various "film" Facebook pages.
Hey, does anyone know anyone over the age of 16 who spends more time on Facebook than Steven Blood? I guess not having a job, or anything else to do, frees up a lot of time to waste! Looking at some of this stuff, you'd think Blood is 16 - some of the most childish stuff comes out this wackjob's "brain".
 
Until the FCC convenes a hearing and determines those statements were intentionally false there is no violation, only an alleged violation. I know this seems like verbal calisthenics, Sheriff Andy; but IMO, it is an important distinction. Georgia Triangle may have been simply overly optimistic in their declarations, rather than intentionally deceptive. Besides, I should think the contract engineer would have a vested interest in seeing to it that no incorrect information was was provided to the FCC. My point is, as it has always been, that while WSBX might have tried the FCC's patience past the breaking point, it is unreasonable to expect the Commission to punish Woody for this. It is Mrs. Blood , after all, who is the licensee; it is she who is ultimately accountable to the FCC - not her son.

MERRY CHRISTMAS!
 
Witchlover said:
It is Mrs. Blood , after all, who is the licensee; it is she who is ultimately accountable to the FCC - not her son.
Click to expand...

Not having complete information regarding business operations at WSBX, the above statement is true and correct unless the FCC determines that an unauthorized and implied transfer of control was given to Steven Blood if the licensee allowed Mr. Blood to have full control over the license. I'm not saying this is what has taken place in the case of WSBX, however, if this is the case, both parties are accountable to the Commission.
 
This is where a law degree and years of experience with the FCC come in handy. When you explain this nuance, it makes great sense - at least to me. If such an unauthorized transfer of control did take place, would the FCC vacate the license (which is arguably meaningless at this point) or would they simply levy fines? Does the FCC have the authority to ban an individual from the industry as does the SEC in the securities industry?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom