WCSB is playing lots of the real thing: Miles Davis, Charlie Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Wayne Shorter, etc. If you want emphasis on commercial "smooth jazz" like Kenny G, this is probably not the station for you.I wish WCSB was playing smooth jazz instead of whatever type of jazz they are playing. I've tried listening a few times, but I can only take a few minutes of it.
Maybe. Maybe not. Ideastream has "Folk Alley" that might benefit from being able to be picked up on regular radios.Even if Salem offered 1420 to Ideastream for free and as a tax deductible donation, Ideastream would more than likely turn it down.
They could, and maybe should, have a Smooth Jazz specialty show on the weekends, or something.I wish WCSB was playing smooth jazz instead of whatever type of jazz they are playing. I've tried listening a few times, but I can only take a few minutes of it.
Doubt it. Wasn't the whole reason they wanted WCSB was because some mega-donor wouldn't give them the moolah unless they got a jazz format on one of their stations? And they weren't going to dump any of their already "popular" stations just to appease one listener that was demanding jazz.. And if it's only for one person they probably don't care about the ratings unless they're worried about negative numbers and I could only see that happening if people are breaking into homes or cars to change the radio dial to anything but jazz.It will be interesting to see the ratings for WCSB. I assume they will subscribe.
Talking Smooth Jazz to a real Jazz buff is like talking disco to a hard rock fan...it can generate some pretty hot responses!They could, and maybe should, have a Smooth Jazz specialty show on the weekends, or something.
Ideastream had/has the Jazz programming on an HD2 channel. I have a friend who works for Ideastream. Said the "mega-donor" was being wrongly tied to the change to Jazz at the radio station. The primary focus of the donation was for a new studio. I presume that to mean a studio where Jazz performances could be done and recorded, and/or for live in-studio content.Doubt it. Wasn't the whole reason they wanted WCSB was because some mega-donor wouldn't give them the moolah unless they got a jazz format on one of their stations? And they weren't going to dump any of their already "popular" stations just to appease one listener that was demanding jazz.. And if it's only for one person they probably don't care about the ratings unless they're worried about negative numbers and I could only see that happening if people are breaking into homes or cars to change the radio dial to anything but jazz.
different strokes of course...but smooth jazz is a commercial format...it would be like asking WCLV to include Mantovani into their mixI wish WCSB was playing smooth jazz instead of whatever type of jazz they are playing. I've tried listening a few times, but I can only take a few minutes of it.
I doubt that would happen...the smooth jazz format is for commercial radio...and it seems to be dying...it doesn't do well with PPM and it has honestly reached the point where those who program it are playing a lot more Sade and almost no David Sanborn et al....even that music tested as "too jazzy" for their listeners.They could, and maybe should, have a Smooth Jazz specialty show on the weekends, or something.
If there is such an outcry for commercial "smooth jazz", The Wave 107.3 would have never changed format.different strokes of course...but smooth jazz is a commercial format...it would be like asking WCLV to include Mantovani into their mix
I doubt that would happen...the smooth jazz format is for commercial radio...and it seems to be dying...it doesn't do well with PPM and it has honestly reached the point where those who program it are playing a lot more Sade and almost no David Sanborn et al....even that music tested as "too jazzy" for their listeners.
That doesn't mean that a non-commercial radio station is not allowed to playing Smooth Jazz. It's not illegal for a non-com to play Smooth Jazz.different strokes of course...but smooth jazz is a commercial format...it would be like asking WCLV to include Mantovani into their mix
...the smooth jazz format is for commercial radio.
of course, it's not illegal...but why would a station put on a show that would alienate core listeners to appeal to a group of listeners, whom even if they DO tune in-aren't going to stick around for the other programming? that's like saying, WHK should put on a few decidedly liberal talk shows and the Catholic station should run a few shows that present the Baptist or Methodist prospective...because...it's all talk, so why split hairs over what kind of talk? JazzNEO seems to be about playing the non-commercial version of jazz...not the commercialized version...there's a difference, which explains why you never heard Duke Ellington or John Scofield or Sonny Rollins on WNMV....That doesn't mean that a non-commercial radio station is not allowed to playing Smooth Jazz. It's not illegal for a non-com to play Smooth Jazz.
Good points, but having one Smooth Jazz specialty show could be a positive seeing as how that type of music/format has, seemingly, become something only a non-com could air.of course, it's not illegal...but why would a station put on a show that would alienate core listeners to appeal to a group of listeners, whom even if they DO tune in-aren't going to stick around for the other programming? that's like saying, WHK should put on a few decidedly liberal talk shows and the Catholic station should run a few shows that present the Baptist or Methodist prospective...because...it's all talk, so why split hairs over what kind of talk? JazzNEO seems to be about playing the non-commercial version of jazz...not the commercialized version...there's a difference, which explains why you never heard Duke Ellington or John Scofield or Sonny Rollins on WNMV....
Not true. I was in St George Utah a while back and there was a non-commercial smooth jazz station that sounded really good.different strokes of course...but smooth jazz is a commercial format...it would be like asking WCLV to include Mantovani into their mix
I doubt that would happen...the smooth jazz format is for commercial radio...and it seems to be dying...it doesn't do well with PPM and it has honestly reached the point where those who program it are playing a lot more Sade and almost no David Sanborn et al....even that music tested as "too jazzy" for their listeners.
And if you monetize both (Donations of $) it seems you should make more than if you only do one.I am the chief engineer at WGMC in Greece, a suburb of Rochester. We're a listener supported jazz station (jazz901.org) that does both traditional jazz and runs smooth jazz in some dayparts as well. I'm not sure how much listening is shared across both sub-formats.
that is an interesting thought...it becomes a question of how smooth jazz is viewed...is it just another commercial format that has faded from the dial, or is it something that falls into the category of needed to be presented on non-commercial radio like say jazz, or blues or classical? Looking around the college radio dial, where niche formats often land...I would be hard pressed to think of a show on WRUW/WJCU or the old WCSB that devoted time to smooth jazz. Formats of course, come and go, but that's a format that really seems to have slipped from the dial...do advertisers think the audience has aged out or gotten to small?Good points, but having one Smooth Jazz specialty show could be a positive seeing as how that type of music/format has, seemingly, become something only a non-com could air.
I'm lost-what's not true?Not true. I was in St George Utah a while back and there was a non-commercial smooth jazz station that sounded really good.
WCLV aired lighter selections when Wayne Mack hosted the noon program years ago. Not sure if he ever played anything by Mantovani.