• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Stop The Presses!

Not about radio, but the AJC will cease printing newspapers at the end of the year:


 
Not about radio, but the AJC will cease printing newspapers at the end of the year:


Wow. Will this be the largest newspaper of record to end print at this point?
 
I have HAD to use the digital version for many years. At one time they had delivery in Blue Ridge GA. I wonder will the Canton GA. paper will go all digital too?
 
A little surprised that they are going digital for Sunday. The Chattanooga paper lent iPads to subscribers for the daily paper when they quit publishing a weekday paper, but still had a dead-tree edition on Sunday.

The AJC is one of the remaining media properties still owned by Cox Enterprises, along with the Dayton paper. Cox Enterprises had to take the Dayton paper back (and didn't offer the AJC in the sale to Apollo) because of the media ownership restrictions imposed on Apollo with the purchase of the TV and radio stations, since they couldn't be grandfathered like Cox Enterprises had been.
 
Hey, it wouldn't surprise me if all the USA newspapers everywhere were to go digital and cease from doing print editions.​
I suspect a lot of papers keep their print editions because they have loyal subscribers who only take the print edition. Mostly seniors, but while their hair is gray, their money is still green. I'm not sure I know of any papers who employ carriers, with everyone choosing for delivery by the US Mail.

This inspired me to check my old hometown paper, who I competed with when I was in my first radio job. They used to publish 6 days a week. They had six full-time writers plus some stringers. Now it's two copies a week and one full-timer writer.

The AJC is one of the remaining media properties still owned by Cox Enterprises, along with the Dayton paper.
That's probably the real inspiration here. Paper circulation has likely declined to such a degree that it no longer makes sense to run the pressroom. Gannett, the largest newspaper chain in the country, has aggressively consolidated its presses, and Cox doesn't have the scale to do so.

Cutting back the days of print doesn't help this much. The press still costs a similar amount, because you still need a certain amount of labor to print a paper on time. The press employees are typically unionized and cannot simply be dropped from 40 hours per week to 24 hours.

For a sense of scale, I found a story from WABE that said the AJC presses produced 300,000 copies a day in 2013. The announcement today said they only printed 40,000 papers daily, a decline of 87% in a decade, despite a pretty large increase in population in the ATL area.
 
A little surprised that they are going digital for Sunday. The Chattanooga paper lent iPads to subscribers for the daily paper when they quit publishing a weekday paper, but still had a dead-tree edition on Sunday.

The AJC is one of the remaining media properties still owned by Cox Enterprises, along with the Dayton paper. Cox Enterprises had to take the Dayton paper back (and didn't offer the AJC in the sale to Apollo) because of the media ownership restrictions imposed on Apollo with the purchase of the TV and radio stations, since they couldn't be grandfathered like Cox Enterprises had been.
Apollo initially agreed to take the Dayton papers because NBCO was scrapped; after NBCO was reinstated by court order (and given a deadline of 60 days to sell them), Apollo proposed to scale back print publication of the Dayton papers to 3x weekly, then sold them back to Cox Enterprises.
 
“We must never turn back the hands of the clock. We must always go forward.”
Kinda like WTOP dropping its AM and WSB dropping its 750.

(BTW, you know how the word "five" is said in a southern accent ... and WSB has to say it twice when they ID. It's always there, no matter how much they try to "correct" it. Bless their hearts.)
 
“We must never turn back the hands of the clock. We must always go forward.”
Kinda like WTOP dropping its AM and WSB dropping its 750.

(BTW, you know how the word "five" is said in a southern accent ... and WSB has to say it twice when they ID. It's always there, no matter how much they try to "correct" it. Bless their hearts.)
 

I see this as eliminating something that set AJC apart. I think they will struggle against other digital only news gathering organizations with this move.
 

I see this as eliminating something that set AJC apart. I think they will struggle against other digital only news gathering organizations with this move.
I don't know about that. Even with the downsizing of reporters the last couple of years, they have better newsgathering by numbers than anyone else in Atlanta. The TV stations will cover breaking news but a lot of their "in depth" stories were in the AJC last week.* If the AJC can keep it's news content to the current level they should be OK.

Legitament news gathering is expensive. Unless you have a direct quote, picture, or two legit sources your no better than social media. With A.I. fakes I personally would hate to be an reporter or editor trying to get it correct.

Maybe Gray is willing to spend enough to be competitive but I doubt anyone else is willing to spend enough to dethrone the AJC.

*Not the "free" Internet version but the AJC makes you pay to get most of their stories. Two revenue streams are better than one (advertising).
 

I see this as eliminating something that set AJC apart. I think they will struggle against other digital only news gathering organizations with this move.

The reason I don’t agree with you is the AJC has been publishing its digital edition for quite some time. They know how many subscribers they have and exactly how much money they are making from advertising and subscriptions. They also know how much money they’re making—or losing—on the print edition.

It’s not like they’re just starting the digital edition and hoping it will work. They already know.
 
Legitament news gathering is expensive. Unless you have a direct quote, picture, or two legit sources your no better than social media. With A.I. fakes I personally would hate to be an reporter or editor trying to get it correct.
The word you were looking for is "legitimate".

For the benefit of everyone who's had a brain fart when trying to spell some non-trivial word, most browsers allow you to highlight a word by double-clicking on your spelling, then right-clicking (or control-clicking) on it. A pop-up menu shows the browser's (or Windows/MocOS/Linux's) best judgment on the word you're trying to spell, up at the top, and how to spell it correctly.) It doesn't always work, but it works more often than not.
 
We would probably need to ask of someone in Seattle, which paper is more influential, and more importantly, which one makes more money? Also, which one is more profitable? According to Wikipedia, the still-in-print Seattle Times has a circulation of 210,000 in 2022 and the digital only Post-Intelligencer had 208,000 unique visitors to its website in 2010. It does have a comparison with radio - which stations make more of an impact, listener-wise and advertising and revenue/profit-wise, broadcast stations or digital ones?
 
I'm not sure I know of any papers who employ carriers, with everyone choosing for delivery by the US Mail.
There was a delivery driver for the Los Angeles Times serving my street a couple years ago. He delivered to a grand total of two homes, both belonging to senior citizen widows, one of whose driveways he would always pull into to deposit her paper at her side door.

I don't know if those deliveries are still happening (they occur around 4 AM) but I can't imagine the economics of providing them will hold out much longer.

(I live in a municipal suburban city in eastern Los Angeles county.)
 
I don't know if those deliveries are still happening (they occur around 4 AM) but I can't imagine the economics of providing them will hold out much longer.
My local Gannett paper, which also delivered several national papers like the Wall Street Journal, switched to USPS on in summer of 2024. Many Gannett papers did the same at the same time.

It looks like the LA Times does still employs its own carriers.
 
The reason I don’t agree with you is the AJC has been publishing its digital edition for quite some time. They know how many subscribers they have and exactly how much money they are making from advertising and subscriptions. They also know how much money they’re making—or losing—on the print edition.

It’s not like they’re just starting the digital edition and hoping it will work. They already know.
This removes anything they have that makes them unique as compared to other news entities was my point. Without that, digital subscribers may move. I doubt they'll continue to produce a sigital replica of a print product that is no longer produced.
 
The word you were looking for is "legitimate".

For the benefit of everyone who's had a brain fart when trying to spell some non-trivial word, most browsers allow you to highlight a word by double-clicking on your spelling, then right-clicking (or control-clicking) on it. A pop-up menu shows the browser's (or Windows/MocOS/Linux's) best judgment on the word you're trying to spell, up at the top, and how to spell it correctly.) It doesn't always work, but it works more often than not.
My apologies to the English police. I did this response from my phone*. As I have stated before, one of the "bad" things I developed in my radio career was the ability to "read over" bad copy full of mistakes and make sound conversational. It's automatic with me. I could never be an lawyer. I don't go looking for mistakes in people or their posts. If my posts are really bad, the moderators will delete. If they really bother you, just ignore. This isn't a English Grammar board.

* I was one of the few folks that had a "Microsoft" cell phone. It was a sweet device with a form of "word" built in. Much better than what I have now.
 
My apologies to the English police. I did this response from my phone*. As I have stated before, one of the "bad" things I developed in my radio career was the ability to "read over" bad copy full of mistakes and make sound conversational. It's automatic with me. I could never be an lawyer. I don't go looking for mistakes in people or their posts. If my posts are really bad, the moderators will delete. If they really bother you, just ignore. This isn't a English Grammar board.

* I was one of the few folks that had a "Microsoft" cell phone. It was a sweet device with a form of "word" built in. Much better than what I have now.
I was trying to help on a word that's admittedly tricky to spell. Usually I leave garden-variety typos alone. We all make mistakes.

The paragraph about spelling hints from your browser (or OS) was meant for everyone, not just you. It's surprising how many people, even after all these years, don't realize that that capability is often built in and only a click away. Sorry if you thought I was singling you out.
 


Back
Top Bottom