• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Suggestion - [HD] Digital "AM" section (for WMGG et al.)

Do AM[HD] broadcasts require non-omnidirectional format signals (now, due to interference into nearby analog AM, future, due to insufficient error correction in the AM[HD] signal, the overlap disrupting both the local and nearby signals)?
The directional aspects of the station depend on the licensed parameters at frequency and location, just like AM analog. Ultimately it's not up to the station as to whether they're directional or not.
 
You can't compare the two. Completely different animals.

The difference between MA3 AM digital and DTV is available bandwidth, DTV uses 6 MHz per channel with enough headroom for redundant packets/Bit Error Correction. Plus noise floor at UHF frequencies is much-much less than Medium Wave.

Another thing to consider, is DTV reception has a standard assumption formula for average receive antenna gain and elevation: https://transition.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/SHVERA/SHVERA-FCC-05-199.pdf
MA3 has no such assumptions, because of a mobile/portable reception environment, and unlimited variations in antenna types and receiver gain with varying levels of environmental noise.
DTV has those same variables. Not all DTV is on UHF....many stations are in the VHF bands (some have even had to move there due to the repack). Wish the antenna makers and retailers could understand that!
DTV has to deal with every conceivable combination of physical location, signal strength and interference imaginable.
Seems like phones, satellite and cable all come pre-wrapped with a bow on top (they already know what the variables are, and they are factored in as part of the package of equipment supplied).
With broadcast, it's more like "here ya go...good luck".
 
DTV has those same variables. Not all DTV is on UHF....many stations are in the VHF bands (some have even had to move there due to the repack).
The vast majority of DTV is on UHF. Sure, there are some outliers, but they fall into the regretting-it category. VHF just doesn't work well for DTV because:
1. Lower ERP means lower field strength. Doesn't matter what band. Field strength gets you over noise. See #2
2. VHF band is much nosier than the UHF band. Reliable ATSC 1.0 and 3.0 reception is vulnerable to terrestrial noise. If the station field strength can't get over the noise floor, especially when it comes to fringe coverage, receive propagation means nothing.

I've worked with several stations who are looking at trying to figure out how to move their DTV facilities from VHF to UHF. All have found their overall coverage has suffered, compared with their UHF competition.

Regarding the broadcast MW band? It's noisier in quantum amounts more than the UHF TV band.
 
The vast majority of DTV is on UHF. Sure, there are some outliers, but they fall into the regretting-it category. VHF just doesn't work well for DTV because:
1. Lower ERP means lower field strength. Doesn't matter what band. Field strength gets you over noise. See #2
2. VHF band is much nosier than the UHF band. Reliable ATSC 1.0 and 3.0 reception is vulnerable to terrestrial noise. If the station field strength can't get over the noise floor, especially when it comes to fringe coverage, receive propagation means nothing.

I've worked with several stations who are looking at trying to figure out how to move their DTV facilities from VHF to UHF. All have found their overall coverage has suffered, compared with their UHF competition.

Regarding the broadcast MW band? It's noisier in quantum amounts more than the UHF TV band
These are all points that many of us are aware of.
But, there are hundreds of stations broadcasting on VHF frequencies. There are no available UHF channels left in many areas....in SLC, two stations have had to move to VHF-HB, because the UHF channels are full. Not even a spot for wireless mikes any more in UHF.

Sadly, we've let the RFI problem get completely out of hand. VHF channels are getting noisier every day. Low band used to be considered "prime". High band was "OK". UHF was "a dumping ground for old movies".
Now, it's turned backwards.
Makes me cry to think how AM is now nothing but a legal loophole to get an FM channel.
 
My own limited experience with AM + HD radio is AM 1190 (Radio Disney for the KCMO area), received on a Sony XDR-S3HD.

At night, WOAI AM 1200 would interfere with the upper sideband (of 1190 AM HD) and cause the Sony radio to switch back and forth between HD and AM.

Checking the (USA) AM station list, there are full power stations at 810 AM (WGY) and 830 AM (WCCO), do these interfere with the reception of (all digital HD/AM) 820 WWFD?


Kirk Bayne
 
Last edited:
HDRadio.com lists AM HD broadcasters when you look at an individual market. That said, their data or listing is WAAAYYY out of date. They list 5 AM HD stations in my market, whereas in fact there are none broadcasting any more (that I can hear or find), and at least some of their listed AM HD broadcasters have not been broadcasting in HD for over 2 years, at least.
 
HDRadio.com lists AM HD broadcasters when you look at an individual market. That said, their data or listing is WAAAYYY out of date. They list 5 AM HD stations in my market, whereas in fact there are none broadcasting any more (that I can hear or find), and at least some of their listed AM HD broadcasters have not been broadcasting in HD for over 2 years, at least.

There aren't any AM HD stations listed for the Memphis or Nashville area where I am either. But I was mainly looking for a directory of the new digital AM stations.
 
Gotcha. I think I misinterpreted. You're looking for the digital-only broadcasters?

Yes if it exists. But then it could be that it would still be just a short list at the present time. But I'd like to be able to find a source for when digital AM becomes available.

If it turns out like HD AM and FM have been in my area there won't be any point of my buying an HD radio any time soon since there are still no stations close enough for me to get in HD on FM and nothing at all now on AM. If there were to be an AM digital station to come on in my area with a format I might like I might consider it, but not until then.
 

Anyone w/HD radio checked WWFD 820 to see if there's such a thing as "local - distant - fringe" for HD digital signals or does the "cliff" effect mean there's only "local - nothing"?


Kirk Bayne
 

Anyone w/HD radio checked WWFD 820 to see if there's such a thing as "local - distant - fringe" for HD digital signals or does the "cliff" effect mean there's only "local - nothing"?


Kirk Bayne
There's kind of a thing as "local - distance - fringe" when it comes to HD signals. The way to tell is to look at the signal bars on the receiver. Audio-wise, it's local and stable - unstable/cutting out - nothing.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom