M
MadAirchecker
Guest
> > > I was asking the question regarding what your
> credentials
> > > are because you are so blunt and offbase in your rants.
>
> > Who
> > > do you think you are to post on what is supposed to be a
>
> > > radio board (but, which has turned into people attacking
>
> > > people) ill-meaning "opinions" that are just not
> supported
> >
> > > by research and numbers. It's people like you who have
> > > dragged this radio forum to childish nonsense and
> nothing
> > > informative of the real radio world.
> > >
> > > I don't remember ever reading your "background" on any
> of
> > > your posts (perhaps in one of your ramblings you may
> have
> > > told us a little bit about you). Maybe if I knew if you
> > were
> > > on the air or worked at a radio station, I could
> probably
> >
> > > understand where you're coming from, or what you write
> > > wouldn't seem so naive and ignorant and I and others
> could
> >
> > > see where and why you would say such "opinions".
> Perhaps
> > > you can show some empathy because of your radio
> > background.
> > > Why can you spit forth your venomous "opinions" and
> think
> > > that they are just opinions and also come across as if
> > > you're an expert on radio? Whatever you say seems to me
>
> > to
> > > be far from the truth. To me, you are always talking
> out
> > of
> > > your ass, because you don't know the truth. What you
> say
> > is
> > > illogical. Or, perhaps it's that way to me because you
> > DON'T
> > > know what is going on in the real radio world. It is
> > > evident you are not involved in the Pittsburgh radio
> > > community.
> > >
> > > No, the "can you do better" argument is not childish or
> > > specious. It is certainly valid concerning you because
> > you
> > > are so free to rag on people. It is easy for you to rip
>
> > on
> > > someone, even though you have never cracked open a mic.
> > And,
> > > even easier because of using an alias. This can be said
>
> > to
> > > anyone who reads and contributes to this site. To me,
> > this
> > > site doesn't help or contribute to radio professionals.
>
> > > It's seems like anyone with an opinion (right or wrong)
> > can
> > > spew forth such opinion without regards to consequence
> of
> > > their actions. That's certainly evident.
> > >
> > > Yes, Madairchecker majority of my clients RAVE about
> Mike
> > > Frazer. Deal with it because it's the truth. It's the
> > Mike
> > > Frazers, the Jim Merkels, the Scott Paulsens, who will
> be
> > > the Bill Cardilles of tomorrow.
> > >
> > > Mr. Music
> > >
> >
> >
> > OK, now you're just making a fool of yourself.
> >
>
>
> Madairchecker-
>
> OOOOOooooo CLEVER response!
>
> Guess you realized the truth. And, thanks for keep on
> proving my points.
>
>
> Mr. Music
>
In addition to your inability to spell or construct coherent sentences, you also don't understand the idea of expressing opinions. Opinions, by definition, can't be wrong. You're confusing popularity with quality. "Survivor" might be a highly-rated TV show. It doesn't mean that EVERYONE likes it. In fact, there are some people who think it's the worst thing on TV and wouldn't watch it if you put a gun to their head. That's their opinion. They're entitled to it. Do you love every record that's reached No. 1?
I have no idea why you've chosen to take up residence in Mike Fraser's ass, but that's OK. Just understand that unless he has a 100 share, there are some people who don't care to listen to him. I find it interesting that you're the guy's No. 1 advocate, yet you claim you've never heard the Sheila Hyland segments, which have aired between 5:30 and 6 for quite a while. Either you don't listen, or you're a liar.
Again, you don't know who anybody is or what their background might be, so you really ought to shut up about "what have you done?" which remains a ridiculous argument. There are people who express opinions about the Steelers without ever having played professional football and people who vote in Presidential elections without ever having held elected office.
> credentials
> > > are because you are so blunt and offbase in your rants.
>
> > Who
> > > do you think you are to post on what is supposed to be a
>
> > > radio board (but, which has turned into people attacking
>
> > > people) ill-meaning "opinions" that are just not
> supported
> >
> > > by research and numbers. It's people like you who have
> > > dragged this radio forum to childish nonsense and
> nothing
> > > informative of the real radio world.
> > >
> > > I don't remember ever reading your "background" on any
> of
> > > your posts (perhaps in one of your ramblings you may
> have
> > > told us a little bit about you). Maybe if I knew if you
> > were
> > > on the air or worked at a radio station, I could
> probably
> >
> > > understand where you're coming from, or what you write
> > > wouldn't seem so naive and ignorant and I and others
> could
> >
> > > see where and why you would say such "opinions".
> Perhaps
> > > you can show some empathy because of your radio
> > background.
> > > Why can you spit forth your venomous "opinions" and
> think
> > > that they are just opinions and also come across as if
> > > you're an expert on radio? Whatever you say seems to me
>
> > to
> > > be far from the truth. To me, you are always talking
> out
> > of
> > > your ass, because you don't know the truth. What you
> say
> > is
> > > illogical. Or, perhaps it's that way to me because you
> > DON'T
> > > know what is going on in the real radio world. It is
> > > evident you are not involved in the Pittsburgh radio
> > > community.
> > >
> > > No, the "can you do better" argument is not childish or
> > > specious. It is certainly valid concerning you because
> > you
> > > are so free to rag on people. It is easy for you to rip
>
> > on
> > > someone, even though you have never cracked open a mic.
> > And,
> > > even easier because of using an alias. This can be said
>
> > to
> > > anyone who reads and contributes to this site. To me,
> > this
> > > site doesn't help or contribute to radio professionals.
>
> > > It's seems like anyone with an opinion (right or wrong)
> > can
> > > spew forth such opinion without regards to consequence
> of
> > > their actions. That's certainly evident.
> > >
> > > Yes, Madairchecker majority of my clients RAVE about
> Mike
> > > Frazer. Deal with it because it's the truth. It's the
> > Mike
> > > Frazers, the Jim Merkels, the Scott Paulsens, who will
> be
> > > the Bill Cardilles of tomorrow.
> > >
> > > Mr. Music
> > >
> >
> >
> > OK, now you're just making a fool of yourself.
> >
>
>
> Madairchecker-
>
> OOOOOooooo CLEVER response!
>
> Guess you realized the truth. And, thanks for keep on
> proving my points.
>
>
> Mr. Music
>
In addition to your inability to spell or construct coherent sentences, you also don't understand the idea of expressing opinions. Opinions, by definition, can't be wrong. You're confusing popularity with quality. "Survivor" might be a highly-rated TV show. It doesn't mean that EVERYONE likes it. In fact, there are some people who think it's the worst thing on TV and wouldn't watch it if you put a gun to their head. That's their opinion. They're entitled to it. Do you love every record that's reached No. 1?
I have no idea why you've chosen to take up residence in Mike Fraser's ass, but that's OK. Just understand that unless he has a 100 share, there are some people who don't care to listen to him. I find it interesting that you're the guy's No. 1 advocate, yet you claim you've never heard the Sheila Hyland segments, which have aired between 5:30 and 6 for quite a while. Either you don't listen, or you're a liar.
Again, you don't know who anybody is or what their background might be, so you really ought to shut up about "what have you done?" which remains a ridiculous argument. There are people who express opinions about the Steelers without ever having played professional football and people who vote in Presidential elections without ever having held elected office.