W
WyllyWylly
Guest
The one that costs money... doesn't have advertising other than station imaging. You pay for the lack of commercial time and the variety of niche programming.
Personally, I don't see satellite or terrestrial "winning" so much as co-existing. Satellite drops out under heavy cloud cover/bad weather and doesn't penetrate highway underpasses, tunnels, etc. Sat radio feels an awful lot like 100 different iPods, each with its own genre. Terrestrial has its own set of issues, but in losing the "live and local" element, it also loses a unique feature that satellite can't match.
Personally, I don't see satellite or terrestrial "winning" so much as co-existing. Satellite drops out under heavy cloud cover/bad weather and doesn't penetrate highway underpasses, tunnels, etc. Sat radio feels an awful lot like 100 different iPods, each with its own genre. Terrestrial has its own set of issues, but in losing the "live and local" element, it also loses a unique feature that satellite can't match.