• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Swap Optimod 8500 to Omnia 6exi

R

r0cknr0ll

Guest
So I pick up a contract job and they've already ordered and received an Optimod 8500 that's still in the box from last year that nobody's opened yet - and which I don't want to play with - anybody have any good ideas on how to get it switched to an Omnia 6?
 
whom was it purchased from? Maybe you can work something out with the seller.Is this the 8500 with HD or the 8500FM analog? there is always EBAY. i have clients that use both the 6exi and 8500.depends on taste,but the 8500 in the rock open pre sounds pretty darn good.open and smooth like the 6exi sound.hard to tell them apart.So ,don't give up on the 8500.actually had a client say listeners seem to get better coverages in the fringes with the 8500.Must be that rock solid peak limiting.Good luck.
 
Yeah, what oldiesstation said. Call the company who sold the 8500 and try to work out a deal. Or eBay the 8500. Or live with it.
 
Any top of the line processor can be made to sound like whatever you want. I prefer the Optimod architecture, but I've worked with Omnia and gotten fine results as well. You might make yourself more of a hero by making the O-mod work instead of presenting a new client with the problem of having to spend more money for a different box. I promise you they won't hear the difference between the two.
 
It's only very recently that I've heard glowing reviews of the 8500, so make sure it has the latest greatest software update, I'd give it an opportunity before dismissing it.
 
That's what bothers me is if I have a hard time getting it to do what I want then it's a lot tougher to get rid of an opened box... As is, it's the 8500 HD and they paid about 13,225 for it. Country format. They bought it direct as part of a package for a new tower upgrade they're about to finish - which means it'd have to go straight back to Orban and I'm guessing they don't like refunding them...
 
you will lose money trying to sell or trade.go with the 8500 set it to the rock open preset or the country pre.they will love it.so don't worry.any issues contact marty at orban.he's a whiz and a heck of a nice guy.
 
r0cknr0ll said:
That's what bothers me is if I have a hard time getting it to do what I want then it's a lot tougher to get rid of an opened box... As is, it's the 8500 HD and they paid about 13,225 for it. Country format. They bought it direct as part of a package for a new tower upgrade they're about to finish - which means it'd have to go straight back to Orban and I'm guessing they don't like refunding them...

Listen man, this processor can do Country like Dolly's boobs in a halter top when she was 30. You don't want it to do what you want it to do, you want it to do what they like, and they're not going to like having to replace it with another box. Get over yourself. These people are spending a lot of money in a very bad economy to put on what will likely be a losing proposition from the get go and years to come. Don't complicate what is already complicated. If you're not comfortable figuring it out for yourself, use one of the presets that says "country". All they want to hear is their station on the air and that you're not going to cost them any more money than they've already spent. You have a duty to your client, and that doesn't involve inflecting your preferences on them when they're trying to complete a project.

Use the Optimod. Then get on with the rest of it.
 
I like the Orban flavor for country, oldies, nc, etc. Rock and CHR, no question, Omnia 6. You don't see too many Orban boxes on major market top 40 or rockers. Orban doesn't play well with hypercompressed material unless the open series of presets are used. I developed an open preset that is pretty close to an Omnia 6, but it still lacks that sparkle and punch. I would give the 8500 a try on country. You may be surprised at how good it sounds. Good luck.
 
fm-engineer 'I developed an open preset that is pretty close to an Omnia 6, but it still lacks that sparkle and punch".

Would you mind sharing the settings that mirror the Omnia. If you prefer, send them to me offline. Any help would be apprecaited.
 
If the 8500 is still new in the box, you should contact your dealer first, maybe you could exchange with an Omnia 6...and get a free Omnia One ;)

I like both Orban and Omnia processors but I'm surprised to see how everybody always compare the Optimod 8500 with the Omnia 6. The real Optimod 8500 competitor at Omnia is the Omnia 5, both are 2 bands AGC + 5 bands limiter. Unfortunately, there's no equivalent to the Omnia 6 structure 5 bands AGC + 6 bands limiter at Orban. Maybe Mr Orban will explain why all the products are 2+5 only ?
 
stha said:
I like both Orban and Omnia processors but I'm surprised to see how everybody always compare the Optimod 8500 with the Omnia 6. The real Optimod 8500 competitor at Omnia is the Omnia 5, both are 2 bands AGC + 5 bands limiter. Unfortunately, there's no equivalent to the Omnia 6 structure 5 bands AGC + 6 bands limiter at Orban. Maybe Mr Orban will explain why all the products are 2+5 only ?

If there ever was an erroneous comparison, this is. Making conclusions on the sound of the processors based on specs, is like drawing conclusion on people's personalities based on their height. You just can't do it. Audio processor is an extremely complex system and there a lot of things in there that interact together and create the whole sound. Each processor developer makes design choices that work best for his particular design. You can't just take a piece of the system and make any conclusions based on that. You have to take the processor as a whole and make any judgements based on the sound and real-life performance.

There is also a good old but very valid argument in processing that "more is not always better". And it is very true for the number of bands. A seven band processor may not necessarily sound better than a six band one. Or a five band one. But then, it just might ;) It depends on a lot of all the other factors involved.

I'll let other designers talk about other oversimplifications you made on their boxes...


Regards,
Goran Tomas
 
Goran, I never wrote that a 7 bands sounds better than a 5 bands or any thing like this, just that an Optimod 8500 nearest product from Omnia is more the Omnia 5 than the Omnia 6 due to it's sound stucture. There was no other conclusions.
 
Hi, All!

How much you are able to make one processor sound like another is highly dependent on the market you're in. If you're in a situation where your fellow competitors aren't stepping on the gas to hard, then you can almost make any current processor sound an awful lot like another.

The differences come into play when there is a loudness war happening in full force. In those situations, the various "characteristics" of one processor vs. another really stand out, and are very difficult to get around if what you REALLY want "Brand X", and you're stuck with "Brand Y".

Just like cars, different processors handle differently when pushed hard. Which one is best depends on which one "feels right" to the driver, and is responsive to how he/she wants to drive.

-Cornelius
 
very good point and much to mychagrin it looks like the darn loudness war is back with us.i hear lots of FM's that are indeed fudging with the mod limits.and when they hit that "great" hyper compressed crap it just tears to shreads.
time to get the inovonics mod-monitor back out(ha).happy holidays mr c.
 
Kris Abrams said:
fm-engineer 'I developed an open preset that is pretty close to an Omnia 6, but it still lacks that sparkle and punch".

Would you mind sharing the settings that mirror the Omnia. If you prefer, send them to me offline. Any help would be apprecaited.

I will be at that site next week and will record the settings. IIRC, a change in bass clipping mode is made along with several EQ changes.
 
oldiesstation said:
actually had a client say listeners seem to get better coverages in the fringes with the 8500.Must be that rock solid peak limiting.Good luck.

Interesting, although I don’t think peak limiting is a factor. I've never noticed any coverage issues between 8500 and Omnia 6. This may be a stereo enhancement issue because the stock presets for stereo enhancement seem more aggressive in the Omnia vs. Orban. In either case, I turn them off. The only time I tinker with L-R is with an Ariane AGC. With Ariane, you can have a perceived wider L-R with actually less L-R than the original recording.
 
stha said:
If the 8500 is still new in the box, you should contact your dealer first, maybe you could exchange with an Omnia 6...and get a free Omnia One ;)

I like both Orban and Omnia processors but I'm surprised to see how everybody always compare the Optimod 8500 with the Omnia 6. The real Optimod 8500 competitor at Omnia is the Omnia 5, both are 2 bands AGC + 5 bands limiter. Unfortunately, there's no equivalent to the Omnia 6 structure 5 bands AGC + 6 bands limiter at Orban. Maybe Mr Orban will explain why all the products are 2+5 only ?

The number of bands is one description of the structure of the processing but provides little insight into the details of the sonic texture. Taken by itself, the number of bands is a marketing numbers game like horsepower in cars, or peak power and THD in amplifiers. (31 bands!!! Sounds six times better than five bands!!!! We're the first ones to have ever thought of making a 31 band processor!!!! Buy now!!!!)

In the analog days, it was more expensive to provide larger numbers of bands. But in the DSP world there is very little extra expense, so a designer can freely choose the number of bands that he believes will optimize the sound quality

In a nutshell, we use a 2+5 band structure because the AGC is intended to do gentle gain riding without significantly coloring the sound. Then the five-band compressor/limiter performs "automatic re-equalization" to achieve spectral consistency and to build up density if desired.

I firmly believe that there should be only one stage with more than three bands. My impression of some processors with several stages in cascade, each having a large numbers of bands, is that there is a tendency towards an inconsistent, "monkeys randomly twisting tone controls" spectral texture: If you don't like the texture now, just wait a few seconds because it will change. seemingly at random. In contrast, our 2+5 structure, combined with the details of how it is implemented, achieves a texture that stays tightly locked in across different program material. One of the important implementation details is that the compressor and limiter functions are tightly coupled within the five-band structure and "talk" to each other.

Why five bands? Too many bands causes narrowband material (like telephone audio) to get unnaturally quiet. Too few bands tend to force narrowband material to hit the final limiter or clipper too hard, causing audible distortion. Greg Ogonowski and I have experimented extensively, and have concluded that the number of bands to create a optimum loudness balance between wideband and narrowband material is either five or six. Previous Orban products (9000A, 9100, XT2) have used six bands, but experience has shown that five is also fine.

Of course the devil is always in the details, and the detailed implementation of the compressor sidechains and peak limiting structure more effect on the sound than the number of bands.

Bob Orban
 
rorban said:
The number of bands is one description of the structure of the processing but provides little insight into the details of the sonic texture. Taken by itself, the number of bands is a marketing numbers game like horsepower in cars, or peak power and THD in amplifiers. (31 bands!!! Sounds six times better than five bands!!!! We're the first ones to have ever thought of making a 31 band processor!!!! Buy now!!!!)

A classic!

:)

-Cornelius
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom