Was reading about the affilate changes made by ABC in the late 70s and a couple of posters noted how ABC swapped their High VHF affilates for low VHF affilates (mostly NBC)
Two questions
First was, is this true? I know there is a slight advantage to having a low VHF in terms of power cost and the signal goes a bit farther but would this be enough for ABC to really try and swap them? Or was it something else.
Secondly, I can only think of two high VHF swaps for low VHF swaps
Minnepolis - KSTP(5) went from NBC to ABC and WTCN(11) formerly independent became NBC; leaving KMSP(9) as independet.
And in Indianapolis where WRTV(6) went from NBC to ABC and WTHR(13) went from NBC to ABC
Every other affilate swap in the 70s I can think of ABC swapped a UHF for a VHF as in San Diego or Jacksonville.
So was the low VHF for high VHF an accurate reason for the swap?
And were there any other high for low VHF swaps made by ABC (other than the ones listed)<P ID="signature">______________
Once I figured out the meaning of life....Then I forgot to write it down.</P>
Two questions
First was, is this true? I know there is a slight advantage to having a low VHF in terms of power cost and the signal goes a bit farther but would this be enough for ABC to really try and swap them? Or was it something else.
Secondly, I can only think of two high VHF swaps for low VHF swaps
Minnepolis - KSTP(5) went from NBC to ABC and WTCN(11) formerly independent became NBC; leaving KMSP(9) as independet.
And in Indianapolis where WRTV(6) went from NBC to ABC and WTHR(13) went from NBC to ABC
Every other affilate swap in the 70s I can think of ABC swapped a UHF for a VHF as in San Diego or Jacksonville.
So was the low VHF for high VHF an accurate reason for the swap?
And were there any other high for low VHF swaps made by ABC (other than the ones listed)<P ID="signature">______________
Once I figured out the meaning of life....Then I forgot to write it down.</P>