I heard on the radio this week that Woodstock was 41 years ago. Wow did that make me feel old!
heydaybegone said:BTW- if your doing Canadian, I think it is "eh"... (hey, a few Labatts and who cares, eh?)
HDBG
average_listener said:Finally remembered to listen to 1270 this morning on the way to work (about a 45 minute drive). I live in Lancaster and Scott hit it on the head, it's useless east of Transit Rd. It's amazing how much man-made crap is blanketing the AM band these days. Lots of noise, though it never faded. I didn't get good signal level until I got near Union Rd.
I'm sorry but this is bad on so many levels.
First, AM radio for music is a dead platform. I get more fidelity listening to music on hold. I grew up in the 50's and I know what AM is capable of and what it did, indeed, sound like once upon a time. Has anyone actually heard the letter "S" clearly annunciated in the last 20 years? Sounds like everyone has a lisp. The audio is too compressed for my taste, also. It really got tiresome. It reminded me why I never listen to AM.
Second, it's an unfortunate brand for the station. Folks, this music has nothing to do with Swing. Not even close. They seem to flirt with the Great American Songbook at times but it's not often enough. It sounds like it's centered on 50's pop. A lot of music they play doesn't seem to fit cleanly in any one genre. There's no one selling the music, either. I'm familiar with a lot of it but I heard some things I couldn't identify and will never know because there is nothing tellling you what the track was. The format to me sounds kind of like the first incarnation of WECK (The Mucous of your Wife). Kudos to ownership for trying but I don't see this going anywhere. The audience that first loved WECK is pretty much disappearing.
Element9 said:Some of what's discussed in this thread involves AM radio receiver quality as much as it does transmitter and antenna capabilities. WHLD-AM 1270 shares a five tower array with WNED-AM 970, creating a few problems getting decent (music) audio through the traps and ATUs. The mostly inferior construction of modern day AM receivers and the electromagnetic debris that affects the AM band make matters worse.
RBW said:As far as programming goes, I’d say it seems closer to MOYL. Yes 65+ seems to be the target. I’m actually amazed why they didn’t get a contract with Dial Global and put “America’s Best Music” on there! After all, that's what WECK had before their last incarnation.
RBW said:The DG format skews a slightly younger demographic, and are now adding more late 70’s cuts into the mix while still featuring the American Songbook evergreens. Unless they felt they’d steal a few more ZOOMER 740 listeners away, by digging deeper into the vault.
RBW said:I’m also wondering why they ID as “Buffalo” and not Niagara Falls/Buffalo? Since the tower no longer sits on Grand Island, did they lose their SOL status in the Falls?
SirRoxalot said:Actually, the quality of AM could be similar to satellite - albeit in mono unless you want to go back to C-QUAM. It would require a return to 10KHz bandwidth, and upgrading modern AM processing.
It's more of a slam against the poor quality of satellite radio. Satellite talk channels are no better than AM, and satellite music stations don't begin to approach the quality of a well-processed FM. They're more in the range of a bad MP3. Of course, there are poorly-processed FMs that sound like overcrunched crap (a/k/a "Syracuse pre-set"). Fortunately, we don't have many of those in the Buffalo market.
SirRoxalot said:Just for the record, I've heard Sirius/XM recently, and can instantly tell the difference in music quality when a car stereo switches back and forth between satellite and FM. As far as satellite talk is concerned, it doesn't have to be very good to be better than a lot of AM stations these days - especially the ones churning out i-Hash that I've experienced in my travels.
The audio quality is markedly better if you're in a market big enough to have ground repeaters providing the signal most of the time. It's not as good if you're on the interstate between major cities.
I do agree that there are too many poorly processed FMs, particularly if you listen to CHR or Hot/AC. In our own market, Star is fatiguing to me. They used to have very good processing. Now, they're LOUD, but the processing is just plain ugly. Apparently I'm not the only one spending less and less time on 102.5.
Philip_Airtime said:I'm just astounded by why Citadel chose to name this station Swing 1270. It's anything but! I was listening today. First of all, you hear the liner announcer proclaiming "this is Buffalo's favorite radio station," which is absurd in and of itself! And then I hear him say "Swing 1270" followed by the Turtles' "Happy Together." The Turtles represent swing? OMG! Call it "Oldies 1270." "Gold 1270." Now, I'm not critical of the format. There's a certain charm in hearing this particular format of music on the AM, the radio band where all of these songs were heard for the first time. I commend Citadel for doing something with this frequency. I'll admit it's not a station that I'll be tuning in a lot. But while I was on the road for a half-hour today, it was enjoyable. But please, change the name!
"Swing 1270" may not have been the best choice of names
heydaybegone said:But then again, maybe in "today's" nomenclature...they may be searching for the "swingers" in the market.
(Easy, I'll keep my day job - LOL)
Nick Gerard said:Then they should change it to "Schwing 1270."
(...apologies to "Wayne's World.")
Nick Seneca
"Swing 1270" may not have been the best choice of names
RBW said:"Swing 1270" may not have been the best choice of names
There seems to be stigma these days in calling this type of format, what they used to call it. Last year in the Mohawk Valley (Utica) --- when formats changed on 1480 WADR & 1550 WUTQ, they emerged playing everything from Sinatra, Mathis, et all to The Drifters, The Eagles, Bread, etc... and labeled it "beautiful". The canned liners proudly announced,... "Dean Martin, Johnny Mathis, Barbra Streisand, The Carpenters... just beautiful".... followed by a mid 70's pop-hit! They've since added an FM -- on 95.5 The "beautiful" liners have ceased, but the format remains the same.
RBW said:My wife has a 2008 Hyundai Sonata. I still have my 2003 Toy Corolla. The AM reception on her car, although not bad, is horrendous with selectivity. If close by to a tower (even a weak one) the noise will splatter down several frequencies making even other well heard stations sound like crap. Meanwhile, the AM audio in this car is the dirtiest I've EVER heard. The treble changes minimally when selected from all the way + to all the way -. It's almost as if Hyundai just assumes that you'll NEVER use the AM band period (or want to).
In comparison, my Corolla is just the opposite on everything I've said is wrong with the Hyundai's AM receiver.