• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Synchronized AM transmitters

This technology is older than I am and has a rather checkered history. It was deployed quite widely in the '30s before AM DAs became popular as a means of allowing pairs of stations hundreds--or even 1000+--miles apart to share a channel "without interfering with each other." With the technology of the day, interference did occur, however, because it wasn't possible to lock the carrier frequencies (and phases) together closely enough or to maintain a constant phase relationship over long periods. This caused the technology to fall out of favor. Nevertheless, it never completely died, and today dozens of US AMs operate "experimental" synchronous transmitters--mostly to fill holes in their nighttime coverage. The best known may be KKOB, which operates a nighttime-only synchronous transmitter in Santa Fe to provide coverage east of Albuquerque in an area not served at night by the main 50-kW signal, which becomes directional to the west at night to protect WABC. There is also one licensed station (the FCC may think of it as two stations) not too far from me--WLLH, a Class C, which has synchronized transmitters in Lowell and Lawrence.

The widepread deployment of GPS technology has made it possible to lock together multiple AM carriers closely enough that the frequency and phase differences can be imperceptable. A contract engineer who has been (and may again be) CE of WLLH, has told me that has has carefully driven the WLLH signal(s) in the area between Lowell and Lawrence and beyond and monitored the signal with an FIM. He says that he simply can't detect any artifacts; the two signals meld seemlessly. I can understand his inability to detect any audible beat notes--using GPS for synchronization, the period of such notes could clearly be made days or weeks long. But he says there are no detectable standing waves and that seems impossible to me. I would think that there would have to be places where standing waves would create near-perfect nulls where the two carriers are equal in amplitude and exactly 180 degrees out of phase. The location of such areas could be remarkably stable, but how can they not exist? Any thoughts, anyone?

Is the secret perhaps that the amplitudes are equal where the phases are not exactly 180 degrees apart and the phases are 180 degrees apart where the amplitudes are unequal?
 
Deep nulls do exist. I believe that KKOB's synchronized transmitter frequency is purposly adjusted very slightly off frequency to avoid the deep nulls.
The nulls still exist but the location changes with the heterodyne. The average listener who is in a location where the two signals are nearly equal in signal strength will hear a very quick fade-out fade-in on a regular basis.
 
You are correct, Frank. KKOB's syncronous amplifier is a few Hz off frequency on purpose. This is done to minimize the fading.

Grady does the same thing with 1510 in Boston. He has it set about 15 Hz high to minimize fading with WLAC.

I worked for WLLH and believe me there is a 'mush zone'. Paul has it down to a period involving weeks, but it does still exist.

By the way, It's every bit as necessary to time the audio as it is to time the carriers. WLLH uses an STL from Wood Hill in Andover to feed both transmitters, keeping the audio synced.
 
LA_Guy said:
You are correct, Frank. KKOB's syncronous amplifier is a few Hz off frequency on purpose. This is done to minimize the fading.

Grady does the same thing with 1510 in Boston. He has it set about 15 Hz high to minimize fading with WLAC.

My understanding is that WWZN is offset by 15 Hz not to minimize the audibility of the beat note with WLAC but because of interactions with NTSC TV receivers in homes within WWZN's (densely populated) blanketing contour. When WWZN first moved to Waltham in 1981, TV viewers in the neighborhood complained about, IIRC, black horizontal bars that slowly moved up or down their TV screens.

Grady and I have discussed carrier offsets to minimize the audibility of beat notes, not in the context of WWZN but with respect to WBIX, which he also engineers. Nighttime interference from KYW to WBIX can sometimes be quite annoying and I figured that intentionally offsetting WBIX's carrier could make the effect less annoying. At one point, he asked me, if I were in his position, would I offset WBIX up or down and by how many Hz. I started to think about the problems that even a small offset might have on the tuning of this deeply nulled array and I threw up my hands As far as I know, Grady never experimented with offsetting WBIX's night carrier frequency.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom