25-34? 35-44? 45-54?
> I say broaden the genre. Rotate less. Go a little deeper.
> Keep 'em wondering (hooked) what song you may play next that
> thay may not have heard in a while. How 'bout bands like
> Whitesnake, Cinderella, Journey, deeper Def Lep, deeper Bon
> Jovi (he's huge right now), Scorps, and the ever favorite
> Metallica (nights).
>
> That's classic rock for the 21st century. No Doors, Foghat,
> Led Zep., etc. That's a whole new format... Old Fart Rock!
We Old Farts prefer the term "Dinosaur Rock".
That said, you absolutely have a point. One of the concerns of "Classic" Rock stations is the aging of their audience. Trying to serve 25-54 is really an impossible stretch. Some people on the low end of the demographic - particularly women - would prefer to REALLY "Get the Led Out" - as in "I don't care if I EVER hear Stairway again". On the other hand, those same listeners are really into Journey, a band that generally leaves your Pink Floyd fan yawning and looking for the door.
There are two options. Somebody needs to skew toward the lower end of the demo (ARE YOU LISTENING 95X?), while somebody else skews toward the older end.
There are a number of Classic Rock stations trying to transition toward a younger (25-34) audience.
Q107 in Toronto feature "Hair Bands" on Saturday nights. Since they're Canadian, you can listen live on the web. Generally, putting together a particular genre in a "special" show is a way of introducing new or different music to your audience. If the show generates a lot of "buzz" (radio translation - "revenue"), you can start introducing some of that music into your mainstream.
You would think that a smaller market that has fewer stations would be the place to develop broader and/or deeper music formats since there are fewer choices. Unfortunately, what we're getting are corporations and consultants who are piping in the narrow formats that get an almighty 4 share in larger markets. Then they complain when that format gets a 4 share in Syracuse. Go figure.