TheRover said:
As I watched C-SPAN's coverage of a New Orleans talk show yesterday, I was reminded, again, of how 'good' Talk Radio is more edifying than most TV 'Talk' shows. In other words, I would rather listen to good talk radio, than to see most TV Talking Heads.
TV occasionally has some interesting Special Reports that do well.
But, on a day-to-day basis, I much prefer the insight that I get from what I consider good talk radio, over the TV/Cable TV talking heads.
My first reaction to the title of this thread is to go to "argument mode" but then I realized there must be at least four differrent topics at play.
The first one is the radio listening vs tv viewing issue which is a mechanical difference affected by our personal traits of being a visual person verson an audio person. This is no flat answer to best media. We all tend to have brains, eyes and ears that are wired together differently.
The second topic requires narrowing the defition of Talk Radio. If we are only discussing the format where a "personality talker" is delivering what amounts to a monologue of political philosophy, then with a twisted smirk I would have to respond that the term "good talk radio" is something of an oxymoron. I've been travelling by car in recent days. If I do some more of that I may resort to tuning in the "Bible Thumpers" of preach-and-teach Christian radio. These days they may be less strident and offer more variety than do the radio version of talking heads.
Third topic: why do you exlude interview programs and the C-span style broadcasts of speeches and lectures from the equation? Last night I wandered into C-span2 Book-TV and listened to John Hill talking about his book "The Political Centrist". He is on the factulty of the Indiana Law School. Oh how I would love to have that audio track on my car radio as I steer the car through the ricelands and Ivorybilled Woodpecker bayous west of Memphis.
Topic 4 will have to wait for another day. I think the 95 degree temperature just melted my keyboard.