KJCB said:You mean like almost two weeks ago? Wow, someone at my post office must be on drugs or something.
dustintv said:I don't believe I have ever heard Mike Gallagher before, maybe I should listen sometime.
KJCB said:dustintv said:I don't believe I have ever heard Mike Gallagher before, maybe I should listen sometime.
No, you shouldn't.
NewsVet said:Bill Press (#96) is described as a "Texas conservative heard in syndication." He's heard in syndication all right (Jones), but the last time I looked he was a D.C. liberal who was once the chairman of the California Democratic party.
dustintv said:NewsVet said:Bill Press (#96) is described as a "Texas conservative heard in syndication." He's heard in syndication all right (Jones), but the last time I looked he was a D.C. liberal who was once the chairman of the California Democratic party.
Hmm, that is odd! I wonder if they mixed up descriptions? Maybe some ultra-conservative high up on the list has ended up Press' description?![]()
NewsVet said:dustintv said:NewsVet said:Bill Press (#96) is described as a "Texas conservative heard in syndication." He's heard in syndication all right (Jones), but the last time I looked he was a D.C. liberal who was once the chairman of the California Democratic party.
Hmm, that is odd! I wonder if they mixed up descriptions? Maybe some ultra-conservative high up on the list has ended up Press' description?![]()
Another example of why whatever Talkers says should be taken with a huge grain of salt. Still another example: ranking Lionel nine places above Randi Rhodes.
Ultimajock said:NewsVet said:dustintv said:NewsVet said:Bill Press (#96) is described as a "Texas conservative heard in syndication." He's heard in syndication all right (Jones), but the last time I looked he was a D.C. liberal who was once the chairman of the California Democratic party.
Hmm, that is odd! I wonder if they mixed up descriptions? Maybe some ultra-conservative high up on the list has ended up Press' description?![]()
Another example of why whatever Talkers says should be taken with a huge grain of salt. Still another example: ranking Lionel nine places above Randi Rhodes.
...and yet anoter two: (a) Opie & Anthony way further up the list from Tom Leykis (at least Leykis can still get listeners in Los Angeles and Dallas, while O&A are barely holding onto a Boston terrestrial signal), and (b) Mike Malloy not even in the Top 100 (he was always in that 100 when he was on WLS, but now that he's on in four of the top five markets in the country, he's suddenly an also-ran? Bullspit to that noise)...
NewsVet said:Another example: ranking Lionel nine places above Randi Rhodes.
barooosk said:NewsVet said:Another example: ranking Lionel nine places above Randi Rhodes.
Yes, that's a strange one considering that Randi is on more than three times as many stations as Lionel.
http://talkingradio.blogspot.com/2008/02/randi-rhodes-looses-weight-in-talkers.html#links
All of this is true.Signal_Faded said:I was befuddled by Gallagher's inclusion in the top ten. He is losing affiliates and has quickly become a tier two near tier three talker. Boortz, O'Reilly and Ramsey should all have easily been above Gallagher.
I also found Imus's insertion in the Top 10 a bit odd...yes he has has a tumultuous 18 months but outside of NYC who listens to the guy?