I don't know, but it's a beauty. I've sat in front of it and drooled. But what do you do with it? Huge tax write off I suppose.radiorob2.0 said:Here is a rundown from wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_structures_in_the_world
The WAVE tower was twenty years too late. It did improve coverage but by 1990 cable was off and running. What do you do with a 1739 foot tall guy mast?
BobOnTheJob said:I don't know, but it's a beauty. I've sat in front of it and drooled. But what do you do with it? Huge tax write off I suppose.radiorob2.0 said:Here is a rundown from wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_structures_in_the_world
The WAVE tower was twenty years too late. It did improve coverage but by 1990 cable was off and running. What do you do with a 1739 foot tall guy mast?
radiorob2.0 said:Another tall mast is WPSD Paducah. The 1626 foot guyed structure is located in Monkey's Eyebrow, Kentucky.
TheRover said:I recently looked up the height of some towers near me. I was impressed with how tall they were. But antennasearch.com indicated the towers were only 500 feet in height.
So, these towers that are 2, 3, even 4 times the height .... That would be something to see ! ! !
2,000 feet is higher than most all but the tallest skyscrapers in the world!!
That's especially impressive as it's primary role is FM and there aren't a load of stations sharing the expense of it.eskipper411 said:Era Broadcasting Tower, which holds KMPX and 93.7 KNOR. That's a 2000 footer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberman_Broadcasting_Tower_Era
radiorob2.0 said:Here is a rundown from wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_structures_in_the_world
The WAVE tower was twenty years too late. It did improve coverage but by 1990 cable was off and running. What do you do with a 1739 foot tall guy mast?
Why doesn't WAVE use this tower for its DT signal? I think I know why but would like to hear from the experts...BobOnTheJob said:I don't know, but it's a beauty. I've sat in front of it and drooled. But what do you do with it? Huge tax write off I suppose.radiorob2.0 said:Here is a rundown from wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_structures_in_the_world
The WAVE tower was twenty years too late. It did improve coverage but by 1990 cable was off and running. What do you do with a 1739 foot tall guy mast?
Nope...they're using the old WAVE analog tower on the Knobs.KyDXIn said:Why doesn't WAVE use this tower for its DT signal? I think I know why but would like to hear from the experts...BobOnTheJob said:I don't know, but it's a beauty. I've sat in front of it and drooled. But what do you do with it? Huge tax write off I suppose.radiorob2.0 said:Here is a rundown from wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_structures_in_the_world
The WAVE tower was twenty years too late. It did improve coverage but by 1990 cable was off and running. What do you do with a 1739 foot tall guy mast?
BUT WHY aren't they using this one?BobOnTheJob said:Nope...they're using the old WAVE analog tower on the Knobs.KyDXIn said:Why doesn't WAVE use this tower for its DT signal? I think I know why but would like to hear from the experts...BobOnTheJob said:I don't know, but it's a beauty. I've sat in front of it and drooled. But what do you do with it? Huge tax write off I suppose.radiorob2.0 said:Here is a rundown from wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_structures_in_the_world
The WAVE tower was twenty years too late. It did improve coverage but by 1990 cable was off and running. What do you do with a 1739 foot tall guy mast?