• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Tara's Replacement At WBT Named

TooMuchCoffee said:
Coakley is another conservative hack on a station that is the sad shadow of its former self.

Apparently...liberal talk just don't make the money. Look at the liberal mecca of NC - if not the south - Asheville. Clear Channel has liberal talk there, but it's on a daytimer. CC has conservative talk on the more powerful and 24-hour WWNC.
 
eacalhoun1 said:
TooMuchCoffee said:
Coakley is another conservative hack on a station that is the sad shadow of its former self.

Apparently...liberal talk just don't make the money. Look at the liberal mecca of NC - if not the south - Asheville. Clear Channel has liberal talk there, but it's on a daytimer. CC has conservative talk on the more powerful and 24-hour WWNC.

COAKLEY MAY BE A HACK, BUT HE'S THE MOST BORING HACK I EVER HEARD. WHAT IS WBT THINKING? A COMPLETE LIGHTWEIGHT WITHOUT HIS TELEPROMPTER, HE'S ONLY AT HOME TALKING ABOUT RACE OR RELIGEON. PRETTY THIN STUFF. HOW LONG DOES WBT THINK ITS AUDIENCE WILL STICK AROUND FOR THAT?
 
Tessa said:
COAKLEY MAY BE A HACK, BUT HE'S THE MOST BORING HACK I EVER HEARD.  WHAT IS WBT THINKING?  A COMPLETE LIGHTWEIGHT WITHOUT HIS TELEPROMPTER, HE'S ONLY AT HOME TALKING ABOUT RACE OR RELIGEON.  PRETTY THIN STUFF.  HOW LONG DOES WBT THINK ITS AUDIENCE WILL STICK AROUND FOR THAT?

Vince Coakley always appeared to be such a mellow, nice guy type on TV.  (My wife used to refer to him as a loveable teddy bear). I have not heard him much, but I tend to agree with you.  He's a little too laid back to generate much excitement or listener interest.  Name recognition, sure!  Tough for him to change stripes and turn into the typical boisterous, loudmouth, attention-getting talk host like so many that populate talk radio stations across the land these days.

I still think that Pete Kaliner would have been a far better choice.  Just my opinion, but I think Carl East has got to be on thin ice. 

Ratings appear to be on a downward trend and billings might be off, (Not Carl's fault directly, but I'm hearing commercials usually played on the late night/overnight show in AM drive recently which suggests open inventory in the key AM Drive daypart.  In fairness, I remember hearing that they lost one of their longtime sales guys not long ago).

All of this with a morning show that is so formatted, regimented and devoid of "personality" that it could be "mailed in" and the signs are not good! 

Let's face it!  They've been on a roll for years. Things were still OK when Rick Jackson and Bill White were still there, but when ratings and revenues go down, everything changes.  

With major groups and others moving AM News programming to the FM band, might we see some format shuffling with WBT-FM and The Link?

So many questions...
 
OK, I GAVE VINCE COAKLEY ANOTHER CHANCE TODAY. WHAT A MISTAKE THAT WAS.
HE MAY OR MAY NOT BE A NICE GUY .....BUT AS A TALK SHOW HOST, THIS GUY IS REALLY AN EMPTY SUIT WHO'S OBVIOUSLY IN WAY OVER HIS HEAD. I HAVEN'T HEARD MORE WORDS TO SAY LESS ABOUT ALMOST NOTHING (OTHER THAN THE MOST GENERIC FOX NEWS TALKING POINTS) SINCE THE LAST TIME I HAD THE MISFORTUNE OF CATCHING DOUG KELLET FILLING IN ON WBT.
BORING BORING BORING. IF THEY KEEP THIS LOSER ON THE AIR (ESPECIALLY IN SUCH A CRITICAL AFTERNOON TIME), MY BET IS HIS RATINGS WILL BE BAD ENOUGH TO SINK THAT VENERABLE STATION OR AT LEAST THE CURRENT REGIME AND THE NEWS TALK FORMAT TOO.
WHAT A SHAME.
 
Tessa said:
OK, I GAVE VINCE COAKLEY ANOTHER CHANCE TODAY. WHAT A MISTAKE THAT WAS.
HE MAY OR MAY NOT BE A NICE GUY .....BUT AS A TALK SHOW HOST, THIS GUY IS REALLY AN EMPTY SUIT WHO'S OBVIOUSLY IN WAY OVER HIS HEAD. I HAVEN'T HEARD MORE WORDS TO SAY LESS ABOUT ALMOST NOTHING (OTHER THAN THE MOST GENERIC FOX NEWS TALKING POINTS) SINCE THE LAST TIME I HAD THE MISFORTUNE OF CATCHING DOUG KELLET FILLING IN ON WBT.
BORING BORING BORING. IF THEY KEEP THIS LOSER ON THE AIR (ESPECIALLY IN SUCH A CRITICAL AFTERNOON TIME), MY BET IS HIS RATINGS WILL BE BAD ENOUGH TO SINK THAT VENERABLE STATION OR AT LEAST THE CURRENT REGIME AND THE NEWS TALK FORMAT TOO.
WHAT A SHAME.

I totally agree with you!

The only thing I can figure out is that he was a “cheap hire” and WBT seems to be in a cost cutting mode. Pete Kaliner would have been a better hire then Vince. Yes, I do believe he is a nice guy, but he is not cut out to be doing afternoon drive on WBT and a market of this size. Poor talk radio skills, has a monotone voice and is boring, boring, boring.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom