• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Technical ? KLVL/Pasadena

The current 500 watt nighttime coverage is pretty worthless. Since KLVL is a brokered time station, there may be a lack of clients wanting to buy program blocks during those hours. Siga may just be cutting its losses and concentrating on where the money will be with the 5kw day signal.

Might also be worth poking around to see if some other station on 1480 is wanting to increase its nighttime coverage, and KLVL is in the way.
 
It's a mistake. Radio-Locator apparently picked up on what the FCC listed, and that was because the wording and the check box ("Daytime") on KLVL's application were a bit misleading. They'll still be a DA2, not a DAD. Quoting from the exhibits section "no changes in KLVL's night authority is proposed."
 
That's what I thought, jd. Thank you for the clarification.

Mediafrog, by the looks of KLVL's site they only have 2 clients as it is. One (Radio Triunfico) broadcasts during the day 6a-9p (bearing a similar sound to our friends over at Aleluya), the other at night 9p-6a. I thought KLVL was simulcasting KGOW at night until the nighttime array for The Game was complete?
 
dade921 said:
And also i read all the wild roumors (sic) about KGBC moving out of Galveston. That is not going to happen as well from what i have in my hand as well.
Click to expand...

Okay, but it was more than a rumor. SIGA's application to move to Dayton was real and it proposed diplexing from the KLVL site for night coverage; the proposal was denied for now on technical grounds. That doesn't mean it's a dead issue, of course, unless they have decided not to pursue it as it seems you may be suggesting. What I find interesting is that Bob Morrow handled the application, along with numerous ones for KGOW and it was Gow that filed an objection to the KGBC move. Anything you'd like to share on that?
 
Hey JD, I just got in and it is late. What is funny is i am now the engineer for kgow and have been for klvl since 1989. I do not know what the deal was on all of that stuff. I saw some of the fcc stuff on kgbc. Not only did kgow file against it there were two other stations that flied against it. Who knows what this stuff was all about.
There was alot of stuff going on as you know a year ago with those stations with the former owners.
Have a good one man, Buzz sometime.
Regards
Dade Moore
http://www.dade.cc
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom