• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The "best" sound quality of local radio stations

I present to you the average local radio station in my country.


Their attempt at being loud is pitiful, as the audio peaks at a maximum of -9 dB when demodulated. I believe they use an AEV Mirage FM because I saw it in the background of one of their Facebook posts. But on second thought, I don't think the Mirage is capable of squashing the audio this much, maybe I'm wrong I don't know.

Which processor could this be? I wonder. Or maybe it really is the Mirage with all the controls cranked to maximum.
 
You can make a $14k processor sound like crap real easy.

Oh, I know that. The national radio stations that have the budget for a expensive processor also adjust it horribly. The state-owned radio station has a top of the line processor but distorts horribly! The clipper drive seems to be cranked to maximum.

The sound of the station I posted above seems to have a certain analog quality, at least to my ears. It has a lot of pumping sometimes and occasional overshoots. There's definitely no look-ahead processing, I think their airchain is fully analog (if they even have one, they probably just rely on the Mirage and RDS coder)
 
I present to you the average local radio station in my country.


Their attempt at being loud is pitiful, as the audio peaks at a maximum of -9 dB when demodulated. I believe they use an AEV Mirage FM because I saw it in the background of one of their Facebook posts. But on second thought, I don't think the Mirage is capable of squashing the audio this much, maybe I'm wrong I don't know.

Which processor could this be? I wonder. Or maybe it really is the Mirage with all the controls cranked to maximum.
The problem with this old-school-loudness thinking on the part of PDs is they're just shooting themselves in the foot when it comes to TSL. A great deal of people like music because they may already own the CD, or a copy of the music on their phone. Or, maybe they bounce back and forth between radio and streaming. Intentionally processing radio for loudness does two things, both of them bad:
1. The music loses its dynamic range those who have heard unprocessed versions, find the processed versions inferior. Beats from snare, kick drum, and symbols are smashed or lost in the rest of the mix, rather than having an actual presence from proper dynamics. Overly used wide band AGC's breathe and pump depending on attack and release times. Excessive multiband clipping makes fast songs with already low dynamic range become unintelligible during long passages. Excessive high-frequency clipping has been shown to cause fatigue in female listeners, especially if higher frequencies are intentionally boosted using EQ.

2. Most modern in-vehicle and SDR-based radios have a built-in Automatic Gain Control in software to keep audio levels between stations even. That means all that extra processing trying to be loud, only causes the AGC inside the radio to stomp the levels down further. And because the AGC is a pretty crude form of level control, excessive clipping only induces compression and clipping in the radio. In other words, the radio prevents any loudness gains presented by excessive processing by adding more limiting, trashing the audio quality even more.

In all cases, heavy processing makes listening to familiar music an inferior product as compared with just about anything else. And to what end?? To make some PD or old-school engineer relive the 70's and 80's? All it's doing is driving their listeners to other options like streaming.
 
They also have a humming problem. During quiet portions I can hear a mains hum.

It's a pity that they have bad audio quality, they play some really great songs.
 
Update: They fixed their processing A BIT. They still sound distorted but the sound isn't as muddy as before. It actually seems like the distortion got worse. The mains hum got reduced a bit but it's still there.

I found out that they don't use the Mirage FM processor anymore, the reason the station still kept it was to fill rack space.

They use an AxelTech audio processor. Never heard of this brand before.

 
They use an AxelTech audio processor. Never heard of this brand before.
Italian-made audio processor. On paper it looks pretty good, but I don't have any practical experience with them. Their remote GUI looks pretty intricate. Like one could get into trouble when trying to make too many adjustments in one sitting:
My guess it they probably got it for a lot less than Orban or Telos-Omnia.
 
Italian-made audio processor. On paper it looks pretty good, but I don't have any practical experience with them.

The AEV Mirage FM is also Italian-made. It probably is from the same supplier.

Their remote GUI looks pretty intricate. Like one could get into trouble when trying to make too many adjustments in one sitting:

Its very cluttered definitely.

My guess it they probably got it for a lot less than Orban or Telos-Omnia.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking too. It also has a built-in RDS generator which might have also been a plus for the station. No need for external RDS generators. I just don't know why is the audio so quiet, -9 dB is the peak.
 
Add PPM encoders and Voltair for that crispy metal can flanger sound.
In nearly all other countries there is no PPM and no need for a Voltair.

A PPM and Voltair conservatively adjusted is undetectable. The problem is akin to the Spinal Tap "set it to 11" with programmers and management who don't know when to stop.
 
Good processing, is of course, the key ingredient in good sounding audio, but that's not the entire issue. Processing can sound good on one station and not as good on another despite identical settings. The quality of the source material comes into play here. The old saying of Garbage in = Garbage out is as true today as ever. Starting with clean, uncompressed audio is a good start. Then make sure that the audio path is good and that no hum is being introduced on the path to the transmitter.

Last, the choice of transmitters can have an effect on audio quality. The heart of an FM transmitter is its exciter. This small FM transmitter is responsible for generating the initial signal that is then amplified through various stages to the needed power level. Nothing affects the sound quality of a transmitter more than the exciter's modulated oscillator. The modulated oscillator is where the signal is generated. Up until the past 10 years or so, transmitters usually used a device called a "voltage controlled oscillator" to generate modulated FM signal. The most common method to modulate an oscillator is to use something called a varactor diode. These are sometimes also called "varicaps". All VCO/varactor diode based systems have certain limitations that have plagued the broadcast industry for decades. The chief complains are that the oscillators are microphonic, suffer from AFC problems and add distortion.

If you bump into one hard enough, it will make a sound that will be heard on the air. If the exciter is used in a noisy environment, rumble and other sounds may be faintly heard on the radio. This is called being microphonic. Those of us in broadcasting for a long time have probably seen some VCOs potted in silicone or even put into sealed boxes on rubberized standoffs in some transmitters in an attempt to mitigate this problem.

Another serious issue occurs with the Automatic Frequency Control (AFC). AFC is required to make sure that the transmitter is operating on the correct frequency. To do this, there is a feedback circuit, called an AFC loop, that produces a correction voltage if the VCO tries to drift off of the assigned channel. This works well enough, but the AFC can be fooled by high modulation levels. When high modulation is applied, especially in low frequencies, this can simulate an AFC voltage change and cause the exciter to momentarily drift. This is sometimes known as AFC tearing because it can manifest itself on the air as a tearing sound in the demodulated audio. It also manifests as added multipath. The folks at Harris made a big stride towards reducing or eliminating this problem when they introduced the MS-15 exciter in the late 1970s. The MS-15 used a dual AFC loop operating at different frequencies. There are some variations of this technology and they're far more robust than the simple single speed AFC loop. Today, almost all commercially available transmitters using VCOs have multispeed AFCs. Still, there's an unforeseen drawback. The dual AFC loop prevents or distorts certain low frequency audio energy, preventing it from properly modulating the exciter. This is really just the old AFC unlock problem, reversed. Instead of the audio energy unlocking the AFC, the newly stabilized AFC is so stable that it suppresses some parts of the modulation. Oops! There's no real solution to this.

Last, the varactor diode always introduces distortion to the modulated carrier. Great VCO design and proper Varactor selection can minimize this a lot and produce some very good results, but some distortion always remains.

A number of years ago, a new technology known as Direct Digital Synthesis (DDS) was introduced. It was off to a slow start because it's more expensive owing to the fact that only one manufacturer in the world produces the best chipset for this method.
The DDS method doesn't use an AFC or a varactor diode. Instead, the audio is sampled by a high speed A/D chip and sent digitally to a dedicated DDS encoder chip. The DDS encoder digitally creates a modulated FM carrier that is sonically as pure as the original CD. There's no tearing, multipath or distortion when the signal is received. This creates a noticeably cleaner sound than standard VCO FM transmitters. The point is to always look for a transmitter that uses DDS for the best sonic performance.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom