• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The Blitz

So it's been twenty-four hours and I've been letting this sink in. As a long time listener, I'm kind of stuck to the Blitz name. I know that a call letter and station name change is the easiest way to break with recent tradidtions, but the playlist that they have put up wouldn't have done justice to the old name. This really is a step backwards. I know this may be hard to read for a NABCO employee to read right now. They used to be that station I could tell my out of town friends to tune into.

Usually don't resort to hyperbole, but The Blitz used to be that final hold out for face melting, finger in the air rock in Ohio. It was kinda cool to hear people come here and say, "OH S**T, we don't have anything like this back home! This has been here for how may years?"
 
I understand that times change, but it's too bad that this happenned. Also, despite your cynicism, the only reason people listen to most FM stations is for the music. Last time I checked music was supposed to be fun, right?

Follwing that line of thought, it really does come down to your personal tastes when defining what is fun. Billy Idol isn't fun to me. Just one person's opinion.
 
YES you're right Nu_Roo_2 but you disagreed because I didn't explain myself clearly enough which is my fault.
What I mean to say was:
They have the dominant signal so they will get whatever demo they want PLUS chip away at the other signals audience (106.7 and 105.7). They are the chipper shredder! I was also thinking more historically when their ratings were quite a bit higher and it's slipped over the years because the music landscape changing and fewer people listening to Active Rock.

from Nu_Roo_2
Something's VERY wrong if the far-dominant signal is a chipper instead of a chippee. Speaking of "wrong," why does NABCO seem to feel that Hal just can't do any? My theory is that when he started in the late eighties he slipped a zero next to the 3 years in his contract, and management failed to notice until after they signed. I can't think of any other explanation...
 
Kanza Boom said:
Last time I checked music was supposed to be fun, right?


Ah, not necessarily.

Classical music.

"Don't Take The Girl" by Tim McGraw isn't exactly a "gee, what a fun song!" song.

As for th Idol, you are, indeed, a research sample of ONE. Plenty of 35-44's dig him. (And have more money than 18-24's.)
 
xiradiodotcom said:
EDIT: Also, don't most "format changes" go commercial free at least for a short period? They dove right back into the 3-4 minute breaks.

True, but in lieu of commercial-free I hear they will be kicking off a monster monthlong promo:  Every time Ozzy comes on, the tenth caller scores a pair of free tickets to the destination of their choice on Skybus.
 
Kanza Boom said:
What about the 25 to 34 years olds, just for information's sake.

It's a new day, 25-34 isn't what it used to be. Especially when you consider that most of the 25-34 of yesterday are now the 44+ gang and they still like to rock a little. The other plus is that they are still in the power wheel of their earning days...the kids have moved out and they have plenty of disposable income to spend on all kinds of stuff...this is the music that Hal thinks they will be looking for.

I hate it but I get why they did it...it is targeting a safe demo, especially in he current economic climate.
 
Kanza Boom said:
What about the 25 to 34 years olds, just for information's sake.

Big difference between 25 to 34 (Young Gen X, Older Gen Y) and 35 - 44 (Mid - Older Gen X, Young Boomers). I'm 26 and the majority of people my age, don't listen to radio. If you're talking 18 - 24, they can barely remember a time pre-internet, pre-cell phone, pre-mobile music. iPods, Myspace, burned CDs, whatever. Those things rule their car stereos. Advertisers know this... This is why radio formats often skew older (giving us a bunch of country, AC, and classic rock) and generally stray from younger (or 50+) formats unless they're part of a group (like Clear Channel).

I think dropping the active rock format makes sense from a business perspective but losing a heritage brand, is always a risky marketing decision. Especially, since it isn't changing tremendously (like Active to CHR).
 
Everyone saw what Saga did in Milwaukee by flipping Lazer 103 to 102-9 The Hog, and now these other stations think they can replicate that success.

It'll be interesting to see what happens at 99.7.

I predict the #'s in Men 25-54 will increase modestly and the 12+ numbers will fall slightly.

If I were Clear Channel, I'd consider flipping Radio 106-7 to a harder-edged Modern Rock format similar to 103-9 the X in Dayton.
 
MarkW said:
If I were Clear Channel, I'd consider flipping Radio 106-7 to a harder-edged Modern Rock format similar to 103-9 the X in Dayton.

This is what alt stations did back in the early 2000s. They dropped the pop rock, pop punk, and female artists, in order to focus on the hard stuff like nu metal and rap rock. It brought in men for years but thing is, the "new rock" format is exactly what NABCO dumped, The Blitz. Advertisers were demanding something better.

I can't see CC dropping 106.7's "Modern Rock" (More like QFM96 for a younger generation) format before seeing some results. Plus, The Brew brings in their older male demo. Why threaten your sister format?
 
Here's the deal:

Active Rock is at a point in the pendulous cycle of being "not so great" right now.

New "Rock" music is woefully mediocre. Look at the Top 200. Not a lot of "new" bands making waves these days. You'd think...with all of the alleged avenues for people to get their new music (yes...I'm talking to all of you who think Satellite/Ipods/Internet/Any other media source you can use to slag radio) There'd be at least one of two things happening...1. Terrestrial would be knee-jerking to catch up. Or 2. There'd be some semblance of sales story.

But there isn't.

During times of economic hardship...and it's easily arguable we're in one of those times...People want what they know. Safe...Familiar...Music that reminds them of better times.

Combine that with the dearth of great product, and you have a lot of stations tightening up. I can tell you we keep things pretty down the middle here. And it works. "Active" Rock is such a misnomer to begin with. It's not about current-to-gold ratio. Well, I take that back..it IS about that by definition. But, it was never really about that at all.

It's about being the epicenter of a lifegroup. And calling yourself "New Rock" or "Alternative" or "Classic Rock" is not conducive to broadcasting...it's narrowcasting. And the available audience for niche formatted music stations are so fractured now, that it doesn't make sense. In fact, the only reason the over-fracturing of Rock radio happened to begin with had nothing to do with specializing, and everything to do with promotional budgets. Now that there're no format-specific budgets to promote product, record companies have to pick the best possible outlet for their music. And if a station casts the widest net, hoping to haul in the largest possible audience for their product, there's your outlet.

But again..the music has to be good. Which is why we see so many alleged Rock stations playing stuff like Linkin Park's "Shadow Of The Day" which is in NO WAY a Rock song. But, it appeals to those who buy CDs and therefore record companies can show sales, and therefore Radio has a reason to play what the audience wants.

We are a reflective medium. We play what they want. Or, we don't get ratings. The days of music education are gone for radio now.

That doesn't mean they are gone for good. It means we as an industry are not doing good enough a job of being that epicenter of a lifegroup. We are not engaging enough. We are not interactive enough. We have not given the listener a sense of involvement to the point where they believe anymore. There was a time when Lynrd Skynrd's plane went down...fans called their favorite station. When Kurt Cobain died, fans called us to vent. That doesn't happen anymore. You know why?

We became a monologue. Talking at, and not with.

We ceded our position to the internet, and other media. Because we let Wall St. dictate our product. Because we cheaped out and eliminated live jocks. And those jocks we still have...we tell to shut up. This is nothing short of stupid. People don't hate talk. They love it. They want it. They hate useless talk. And there's a ton of it on the dial. Because PDs have so much on their plates, they can't manage talent. And their APDs are (more often than not) either glorified secretaries, or untrained in how to coach talent. And we have a lot of people in high places, that have neither cracked a mic, nor a creative bone in their bodies. Our business is run by salespeople. And I understand that. We're in it to make money. But most salespeople have no idea what we do on our side. Can't blame them. Some don't even listen to the properties they're selling...that I have nothing but contempt for. But...we need to let these people know how this is done. It's not a regular marketing machine. It's unique. And education is both time-consuming, and sometimes expensive. But which costs more...taking the time to do it correctly? Or, doing it 6 times? Wall St. doesn't have the time, nor the patience.

And now...because times are tough economically, and new product is in a down cycle, stations like the Blitz have to circle the wagons and rearrange their strategy. That's the first step. What Hal chooses to do from this point on is his decision. Everybody's a PD. Most have never actually done it. And fewer know how to do it correctly.

I'll say it again:

People do not listen to the radio for music. They listen to feel connected to the music.

Read it again until you understand it. It is the absolute essence of our industry.

It is incumbent upon every talent to do their best every shift to capture that listener. Make them feel like you care that they're listening. Answer EVERY E-mail. Spend an extra 5 minutes on the phone with them. Don't sit behind the table at a remote. This is show business. We must remember that. Give them 5 minutes, and you can have them forever. Know everything there is to know about EVERY band on your playlist. Take credit for other stations' contesting. If someone calls and asks if they're the right caller, don't tell them you're not giving anything away. Let 'em know you just got a winner, and thank them for listening. They came to you...don't send them away disappointed.

I think I've rambled enough.

What The Blitz did...is the right thing for Rock Radio 2008-2009. They're no longer one thing. They are "The Rock" and when executed correctly that's a brand in itself. The audience picked the songs. The PD arranges them. The talent does their jobs correctly. And...the audience will be there.

Do your job correctly. And you will be successful.

It really is that simple.

The trick is to find "correctly" in today's radio structure....
 
It brought in men for years but thing is, the "new rock" format is exactly what NABCO dumped, The Blitz. Advertisers were demanding something better.

I can't see CC dropping 106.7's "Modern Rock" (More like QFM96 for a younger generation) format before seeing some results. Plus, The Brew brings in their older male demo. Why threaten your sister format?

You believe Radio 106-7 is going to be more lucrative to advertisers than 99-7's old format?

C'mon!!!!

They are NEVER going to see results with that piece of crap.

CD101 -- which is far from being a mass appeal station -- owns that arena. Channel 105-7 was already a failure. Clear Channel is trying to fill a void that does not exist.

I don't see how a hard-edged Alternative Rock format on 106.7 would threaten The Brew at all. If anything, it would nicely supplement the Brew's male audience. It would also supplement the 18-34 numbers of WNCI.

Look at Dayton -- Clear Channel has 103-9 The X and WTUE. That combo has been around for a long time. Seems to work great.

I guarantee you there will be PLENTY of people who will grow tired of hearing the dinosaur rock from the 80's on 99-7 in short order. Cripes, they're playing Bon Jovi about every 2 hours! Is this station designed for central Ohio or New Jersey?

If 99-7 would've simply expanded its 90's library, thrown in a couple cuts an hour from the biggest 80's & 70's hard rockers (Zep, Floyd, AC/DC, Ozzy/Sabbath, etc), and still maintain a nice list of currents / recurrents (like WBYR in Fort Wayne or KQRC in Kansas City), I think that would've been perfect.

Instead, 99-7 has gone overboard on the dinosaur rock and has cut back too much on recent music. This will leave themselves vulnerable.
 
I just know that my clock radio woke me to (&^&^%* Def Lepperd this morning.
On a side note.... 96.3 and 99.7 were playing the same song @ the same time last night. Just Sad.
 
MarkW said:
You believe Radio 106-7 is going to be more lucrative to advertisers than 99-7's old format?

C'mon!!!!

They are NEVER going to see results with that piece of crap.

On the contrary, the qualitatives are MUCH better.
 
Don't you need a critical mass of listeners first before you can gauge "qualitatives" ?

National & regional advertisers won't give a crap about 106-7 because its ratings are & will continue to be minimal.

I'm guessing local advertisers, meanwhile, who wish to reach that life group will stick with CD 101.
 
MarkW said:
Don't you need a critical mass of listeners first before you can gauge "qualitatives" ?

National & regional advertisers won't give a crap about 106-7 because its ratings are & will continue to be minimal.

I'm guessing local advertisers, meanwhile, who wish to reach that life group will stick with CD 101.

Extrapolating from the trend just released, 106.7's approx 2-month 12+ doesn't look any lower than CD-101's.  Maybe signal quality should be figured in, although signal quality is a legitimate variable to consider in determing the likely "winner" (to the extent these stations are really competitors).

BTW, the trend observation isn't intended as an endorsement of either station.   But I can't see CD-101 ever being considered a winner in anything, except maybe delusional self-congratulation (including that meaningless ballot-stuffed annual Columbus Monthly "best station" contest).
 
Why don't you all just quit bitchin', whinin' and cryin' like you just got your bicycle stolen from the town bully and leap into the future and pay $12 a month for a Sirius. Then you will have 180 channels to choose from. Most of you will say, "I'm not paying $12 to listen to radio." But you'll pay $5-$10 everyday for fast food and not to mention paying $50 a week for your Starbucks. Just remember one thing, 25 years ago, people said they would never pay money to watch cable t.v. when regular t.v. was free. Do you remember when water was free? Now 75%-80%, or more, of Americans buy their water. Do you remember when air was free? Well today they actually have oxygen bars. Nothing is free when you want the best!! Lay off your lattes and artery cloggers and buy the best!!
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom