From Taylor On Radio, May 10, 2010
Citadel faces a confirmation hearing on Wednesday, though with some dissent.
But Farid Suleman – whose continued employment as CEO was the subject of a 77-page bankruptcy court filing on Friday – still has shareholder Aurelius Capital biting at his ankles. And Aurelius is now joined by Virtus Capital and the Kenneth S. Grossman Pension Plan. They’re all asking that the latest version of Citadel’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy re-organization be denied, on the grounds that it’s unfair to the shareholders and gives the senior lenders too much. Another development on Friday – Aurelius joins the “file under seal” brigade. We learn that Citadel (as the debtor) and Aurelius are in discovery mode. They’ve “entered into a confidentiality agreement” that precludes Aurelius (actually, the three separate funds advised by Aurelius) from revealing the results of what it finds out. But it can share them with the court, which is what this “under seal” request is about. Meanwhile, there’s a report to the court from Kurtzman Carson Consultants that 96.07% of the senior secured creditors accept the latest version of the Citadel plan. And 89.77% of the general unsecured creditors do. In some cases the creditors abstained, or filed late.
---
"File under seal" means the little people (aka, "the public, employees past and present, and unsecured creditors") won't get a chance to look at Citadel's books, but because there could be something amiss, the judge will. In bankruptcy, the usual concern is how the money that's available is parceled out. There are both secured and unsecured creditors. Secured creditors who have legal paperwork in which the debtor acknowledges its obligation and the creditors' right to be paid, get first crack. Seems like these guys are using "discovery" to get a look at Citadel's books and Citadel wants to keep what is learned under wraps from the other creditors. The judge gets to see the results, so that should minimize the legal maneuvering, e.g., Citadel claiming it doesn't have the money when the books say otherwise; how much money may be available, or vice versa, Citadel being able to show it doesn't have the money and perhaps more important, where the money went (CEO, CFO, upper management, etc.) Bankruptcy law is known to be extremely tedious, only slightly more tedious than my posts. Book keeping needs to be produced and inspected. It helps to be well versed in the "tricks of the trade" and corporate slight of hand, not that Citadel or Suleman would resort to such chicanery.