Goat Rodeo Cowboy said:
It is a question that you WOULD ask in a lot of places. And it is really two questions.
1. There are many markets where a large part of the population can be classified in some way by derogatory terms. It is easy to bqack off and say: Radio in the city that programs to the African American population can't possibly work because they have low paying jobs, they have a high drop-out rate in schools so they will not be radio listeners. Apply to any ethnic community in any large city. You can't possibly make radio work out the wheat-belt... the plains states... because farmers live out there where the nearest neighbor is a mile and a half away so they are anti-social and will not want their little cocoon punctured with the sound of radio. We can make up a lot of excuses why certain communities will not listen to radio. I think some good arguments could be made that the people of the Delta might be better than average radio listeners!
Now, I wasn't implying anything about the race or ethnicity of the listeners by referring to the Delta as a third world hell hole. I tried to not let that thought even cross my mind because I've been told time and time again, "it doesn't matter who it is, it only matters if they listen and support the advertisers."
In fact, I've brought up the idea of programming targeted towards the so-called "urban" demographics but have been shot down because those demos, while heavy on radio listening, don't have as much money to buy with. So I'm basing my beliefs off of what I've been told.
But the Delta is
inarguably one of the poorest sections of the entire United States; parts of it are right up there with the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota for sheer poverty levels, credit defaults and depressed incomes. I know, I lived on the edge of the Delta for four long miserable years and spent more time there than just about any other part of the state.
Goat Rodeo Cowboy said:
2. Money demo? By that, are you suggesting that only people in the upper echelon of earnings are radio listeners or will spend whatever money they have based on radio advertising? I think wome good argument could be made that through the years hometown radio even more than big city radio has made a living selling products and services to people from the most humble of financial backgrounds.
Are we talking about what maybe you and I want to listen to on the radio so we assume that is what radio should be, or are we going to talk about the people who show up at Piggly Wiggly and IGA and the automobile retailer to kick tires and talk cars?
When it comes to radio... including radio in the Delta... who is "The Money Demo" ?
The money demo: 18-54. Advertisers don't care as much about selling outside that sweet spot. Personally I think the older demos are neglected, after all this is where you have people nearing the end of their careers, with their lives in order and more disposable income to spend. Or the sizable amount of retirees who have a fixed income but money to burn. But that's just me and I'm a radio outsider so take it with a grain of salt. The point is, it doesn't matter what the income level is, that's the age range advertisers seem to covet the most.
Also…
What you have in the Delta is a spread out population and no one center of commerce to concentrate on. There's money in the Delta… one only need ride through the outskirts of Greenville or around Robert E Lee Drive in Greenwood to see the nicer homes… and the Delta as a whole has a decent popultion, but it's so spread out it doesn't do a whole lot of good to advertise a BBQ joint in Carrollton and expect people from Cleveland to go for a visit. And there are plenty of 18-54's in all walks of life, of multiple backgrounds with varying tastes in music. They're just really spread out.
The beauty of radio is it's beyond income levels. Everyone listens, whether they're dirt poor or living behind gates. But the poorer someone is, the less likely they are to spend their money on something they heard on the radio. So it's silly to chase low income listeners, who mostly shop at Dollar General and Wal-Mart, two companies which don't do local buys as far as I know.
My question to you, Mr Cowboy, is, "Is that racist or bigotry in action?" I say no. Part of running a successful ad campaign is getting the most bang for the buck, and advertising directly to those who are least able or willing to buy a product is not efficient. And targeting people in the upper echelon of earnings, in the Delta, is stupid too. There just aren't that many "rich" people (no matter
how you define rich.)
So what are we left with? A wide "middle income" group comprised mostly of adults aged 18-54. Spread out over a hundred miles in any direction from the center, it means it's tough to make a living in any one small town. And yes, I consider Greenville, the largest Delta city, a "small town" by national standards. Break down the demographics of some towns, and it becomes an even harder sell. Half black, half white, half male, half female. There aren't a lot of format holes in the Delta now that play to all four subsets.
Finally… if I'm wrong, set me straight. Every thread is a learning experience.
