• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The End of TV Is Here

I will never understand technophobia. Pretty much everything in terms of media or communication is the easiest it's ever been in my lifetime. Hit the icon for whatever it is you want and it plays.
It's not always technophobia. Companies constantly push out updates to all these apps and systems. Sometimes things that were working fine get screwed up by the update.
I experienced this in Radio with engineers. They would tinker and change things in the studio with no regard for the people who created the content.

These days, Smartphones can do almost everything except make a phone call. I didn't have a cellphone in college and life was pretty sweet. I had lots of things to do without staring at the screen for 18 hours a day...
 
Last edited:
These days, Smartphones can do almost everything except make a phone call. I didn't have a cellphone in college and life was pretty sweet. I had lots of things to do without staring at the screen for 18 hours a day...
The Internet seems to be full of posts about how wonderful things were before the Internet. I remember people talking about how wonderful everything was before TV. Maybe you completed reading assignments in college staring at a book while students do that now by staring at a screen. Five hundred years ago people probably complained that those handwritten books were works of art not like those soulless printed books Herr Gutenberg turns out.
 
The Internet seems to be full of posts about how wonderful things were before the Internet. I remember people talking about how wonderful everything was before TV. Maybe you completed reading assignments in college staring at a book while students do that now by staring at a screen. Five hundred years ago people probably complained that those handwritten books were works of art not like those soulless printed books Herr Gutenberg turns out.
People tend to view things through a certain lens. As I said, technology is not good or bad. Every generation grows up under different circumstances. Radio was once the main source of home entertainment until TV came along.

I wasn't talking about using computers for schoolwork which is fine. As a society we have become addicted to our phones (which I am guilty of at times). I simply think back to the time before the Internet and realise that life was pretty pleasant...
 
It's not always technophobia. Companies constantly push out updates to all these apps and systems. Sometimes things that were working fine get screwed up by the update.
I experienced this in Radio with engineers. They would tinker and change things in the studio with no regard for the people who created the content.

These days, Smartphones can do almost everything except make a phone call. I didn't have a cellphone in college and life was pretty sweet. I had lots of things to do without staring at the screen for 18 hours a day...
Which is off the point I was responding to, which was directly technophobia:

IMG_7778.jpeg
 
No such thing as a "digital" antenna.

It's a matter of definition:


It's not just the antenna, but the data stream that it converts. It's as opposed to cable or satellite.

Keep in mind that analog TV for the most part no longer exists. That part of the spectrum is being sold. So TV has moved to digital channels.
 
Keep in mind that analog TV for the most part no longer exists. That part of the spectrum is being sold. So TV has moved to digital channels.
Analog channels over the air haven’t existed for a decade plus. Low powered stations and translators were the last to convert.
Canada still has some
The spectrum was already sold from channel 38 up a few years ago.
 
Read it again
I did in big print:

"Big data can advance the science of audience measurement, but it doesn’t capture OTA viewing"

next big print in the article:

"Nearly 23 million U.S. homes access free TV programming using digital antennas"

then right below two points were numbered:

#1 "The vast majority of TV homes continue to watch traditional, ad-supported programming".
#2 "Big data sources alone can’t provide insight into the viewing behaviors of the millions of viewers who watch TV using a digital antenna. "

Am I correct assuming Neilson is part of "big Data"?
 
Am I correct assuming Neilson is part of "big Data"?

No. Who is the author of the article? Nielsen measures using PPM, not data. PPM measures people. Streaming is measured by data. The ISP reports who is using streaming TV, and that kind of information is limited in the demographics it provides. Nielsen is demonstrating the advantages of PPM measurement vs. online measurement.
 
No such thing as a "digital" antenna.
Thank you. An antenna is simply a device that detects electromagnetic waves on a particular range of frequencies/wavelengths, in either an omnidirectional or directional pattern, depending on design. It doesn’t care what the transmission format is. That same antenna can receive the most sophisticated digital codecs as well as someone tapping out Morse Code by turning an unmodulated carrier wave on and off. It’s up to the attached receiver equipment to turn those electromagnetic waves into something intelligible.

“Digital antennas” and “HD antennas” are just marketing hype for dummies.
 
The point of the article I posted is that digital antenna use a different connector than the old rooftop antenna.
Not if coax is being used. RG-6 has been the standard for TV cable for close to 50 years, although the quality of coax is better now than it was then, thanks to cable and satellite TV. They used a Type F connector then as they do now.

The old 300 ohm twin lead has been obsolete since the 1970s. It worked well enough on VHF (unless it rained), but was too cheap to be usable on UHF unless the high-grade foam cable was used. Most people didn't want to spend the extra money.
 
The point of the article I posted is that digital antenna use a different connector than the old rooftop antenna. They are not the same thing.
Huh? The 40-year-old yagi on my neighbor's roof has the same F-connector as a "digital" antenna you can buy at the hardware store. It pulled in analog TV 40 years ago and does just fine with digital TV today.

Some people I talk to are flabbergasted when I tell them our digital TV station is transmitting with the same RCA antenna and 6-inch transmission line that was installed in 1972.
 
I have a combo VHF/UHF/FM antenna purchased over 35 years ago. Still works fine on analog FM and digital UHF. Before we moved closer to the TV towers the range was about 30 miles as the crow flies. Now we're about 8 miles. Yes, I'm OTA.
 
Earlier it was mentioned about the end of OTA broadcasting. If anything the ATSC 3.0 mess is looking like, it'll be like the ONTV days of the early 80s.
ONTV was never that complex. Digital TV in any form hadn't been invented yet. They used a 15.734 kHz sine wave that was out of phase with respect to the horizontal sync signal, with an FM subcarrier for sound. A VCR with thumbwheel tuning for each channel could cancel out that sine wave very easily, and so could be a simple converter box that could be bought or built for $100-150. The VCR couldn't decode the sound (the box could, though), but if I was watching sports, then I could get the sound off the radio.
Signals being sent with DRM encryption that no converter box much less TV set with a 'NextGen TV' tuner in it can't de-encrypt for what?----charging for diginet subchannels or the primetime network programming only? 'They' seem hellbent on complicating matters all in the name of targeted advertising--*cough*---infringement.
NextGen (ATSC 3) is a joke that seems to be on its last legs, even before it attempts to replace the current system. Unless the marketroids pull their collective crania out of their keisters, and soon, this system is dead.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom