• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The Jet has no engineering department?

Maintenance wasn't that expensive over 24 months. Because of the market size and ultimate revenue contribution of that particular station, I would have recommended not replacing the exiting building UPS. Instead, I'd opt for rack mounted UPS's for critical racks only.
Stand alone station with back up power sources. Minimal office space and likely few employees at any given time. Makes sense to save money on the cost of buying a generator. Individual UPS can be replaced as needed. If one goes down or quits than you can rely on multiple other ones.
 
“I thoroughly doubt that. Nobody pays to have monitoring done to catch off-air incidents of a station group they are invested in.”

They do. Most broadcast companies have remote monitoring from out of market that keeps watch on everything from automation to transmission sites. This is reporting any disruption of service. Information is reported to management.
While more and more groups have centralized logging and control functions, that is intended to save money and guarantee supervision 24/7.
“That is why a station in NYC or LA may have a fully equipped auxiliary transmitter site, but one in Utica or Fresno will not.”

I bet Fresno and Utica have functioning AUX systems in place.
They may have an auxiliary transmitter, but very likely they do not have an auxiliary site.
“There is a point where the cost of prevention vastly exceeds the saving of airtime or the loss of revenue and is not worth it”

This is having your cake and eating it too. “It better work 24/7 but don’t spend money keeping it functioning”. Not uncommon.
"Don't overspend when the ROI is not justifiable" is the axiom here.
“It sounds like your experience in management, sales and general administration are very limited)”

Hahaha! Enjoying retirement.
That did not answer the question. You may have engineering experience, but your comments on management are not realistic now or "back in the day".
 
Can you site specifically what didn’t make sense? I may be able to clarify. ( I’m doing more things at once than just typing here).

“Enjoying retirement” implies what and how I did set me up for later comfort. Must’ve made some sense.
 
Did they at least have a backup power source so when the power goes out they can see and walk around and shut computers down? Or did it just shut off all at once? Sucks to have a full days work get dumped when a cpu shuts off.
Most of us have systems that save or backup jobs frequently.

Even Microsoft Office has options for backup frequency. Things like traffic and music scheduling "save as they go" so the most you loose is a few minutes of work.

But the ideal situation at a smaller station is to have an over-the-counter UPS for the traffic and music logging system as well as the studio computer. You can get those in the well-under-$200 each range with controls that do automatic power off after a certain time. No need to have a great big gas or diesel generator when you only lose a few minutes every year. And the UPS gives a good degree of surge protection, too, if properly maintained.

In most stations and markets, anything else is overkill.

On the other hand, I spent many years where local power was unreliable and outages occurred several times a month and could last several to many hours. Oversized generators with at least a week's worth of fuel were justified, and they got 100 to 200 hours of use a year... around 5% of all airtime.

In those cases, it was not about lost revenue as makegoods are your friend. It was about losing audience too many times in prime dayparts, which could affect ratings. The cost of the generators far exceeded any lost revenue (which was minimal at the worst) but it was justified in keeping a top rated station in its hard-earned position.
 
I want Ryan Seacrests budget. Now. And I wanna work from home. Where’s my signature go?
And Ryan produces many times his pay in income. What do you provide to justify your salary?
 
I would hope that at least a few of us on this board have not just worked in a radio station, but actually put their life savings on the line and had to at least break even, and hopefully make a profit. My observation over the past 60+ years is that very few of those who work in the biz know anything about the actual costs of operation. I surmise that those NOT in the business know even less. The days of having a spare cart machine or turntable needle are long gone, and no matter how much backup we have, something can happen to take us down. And then there's the problem of finding anyone with the expertise that is willing to work in the broadcast industry, which now has to work with contract engineers due to 1) limited resources, and 2) lack of available personnel.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom