RTibbs said:Is Q100 ahead due to Star falling or is Q100 getting a good bump from the switch to 99.7?
RoddyFreeman said:By the way, Star 94 is promoting that The Morning Mess will be appearing around town next month, but they're not yet revealing where they'll appear. But I think I've figured it out...the unemployment office.
bclark71. said:RoddyFreeman said:By the way, Star 94 is promoting that The Morning Mess will be appearing around town next month, but they're not yet revealing where they'll appear. But I think I've figured it out...the unemployment office.
Don't forget Spherion, Kelly Services, Talent Tree, TRC, Addecco, OfficeTeam, Manpower...
bclark71. said:Don't forget Spherion, Kelly Services, Talent Tree, TRC, Addecco, OfficeTeam, Manpower...
Is Cindy the jock on Star who got stopped for a DUI some time ago?RoddyFreeman said:RTibbs said:Is Q100 ahead due to Star falling or is Q100 getting a good bump from the switch to 99.7?
Cindy & Ray have outrated mornings on Star for a long time, but they had a great book; they're Star's saviors. As I've said many times, I don't think the show is consistent with a CHR format, but it's obviously working for Star.
Uriah said:For a moment set aside our ancient metrics that we insiders sometimes use to rate radio format success - from daypart importance and rotations to song cluster analysis, the diary method of retrieving data, etc. After all media consumption is very different compared to even three years ago. Drive time is 5a-8p and streaming is driving midday, not stay at home soccer moms.
Bottom Line: Cindy and Ray win with entertaining, relevant content and like-able personalities. To a point the music during C&R is an interruption or interlude between topics.
Obviously TMM on Star 94 has to contribute to justify the 500k + invested. However, unless you have a gaping hole in a market (like for the TRG's) a new show can take three years to establish habitual listening, consistent numbers and sales success. Can LF pony up in the long run is the question.
Bigger Issue for radio in today’s content rich environment: Next time you watch the Daily Show count the number of people in the credits - writers, producers, etc. It will exceed 50! And that's for 22 minutes of programming with retakes.
Comparatively, How many people and sources are involved in producing many radio drive-time shows where the talent is called on to be entertaining 5-6 times an hour for 4 hours a day – LIVE!?…. Let me guess… A coffee gopher to TIVO last nights Letterman and Colbert Report…one minute for someone to download three daily joke sheets that every show in town uses… another 10 minutes to book last nights American Idol Looser and 5 more to edit the phone scam ( that will be replayed multiple times). Maybe 5 people total? And we wonder why talent gets burned out and content becomes repetitive.
C&R are dedicated to show prep beyond the obvious and easy and it shows. Another guess: Cox knows the last day of their contract.
3 MONTHS?? You don't understand the biz very well, my friend. The original poster was correct. People, in general, don't care as much about radio as we on this board do. They're very passive about it (and getting more an more each day). It can easily take a couple of years for a brand new show to build a listener base. Plus, because of the Arbitron lag, it usually takes even longer for their popularity to show up in the ratings. The Bert Show, Regular Guys, Morning X, all took years to build strong followings. Unfortunately for shows like Zakk Tyler and the Morning Mess, the business is such now that companies want instant results and if you don't show good numbers inside a year you're most likely toast. It's completely unrealistic to expect (again, for a brand new show) but that's the reality. If Marco, Shannon, Mikey, Zakk, Cledus, Giant, etc are smart they should have saved some of their wardrobe boxes when they moved. Those things are expensive.Tibbs2 said:I have to question the accuracy of it taking three years to establish listenership patterns. I have never heard that nor
is it logical. If it's a consideration LF used to pick TMM, we all are missing something. Three months, I can see. That is
a lifetime in radio these days. Everything was supposed to be successfulllll yesterday, remember?
wooder said:3 MONTHS?? You don't understand the biz very well, my friend. The original poster was correct. People, in general, don't care as much about radio as we on this board do. They're very passive about it (and getting more an more each day). It can easily take a couple of years for a brand new show to build a listener base. Plus, because of the Arbitron lag, it usually takes even longer for their popularity to show up in the ratings. The Bert Show, Regular Guys, Morning X, all took years to build strong followings. Unfortunately for shows like Zakk Tyler and the Morning Mess, the business is such now that companies want instant results and if you don't show good numbers inside a year you're most likely toast. It's completely unrealistic to expect (again, for a brand new show) but that's the reality. If Marco, Shannon, Mikey, Zakk, Cledus, Giant, etc are smart they should have saved some of their wardrobe boxes when they moved. Those things are expensive.Tibbs2 said:I have to question the accuracy of it taking three years to establish listenership patterns. I have never heard that nor
is it logical. If it's a consideration LF used to pick TMM, we all are missing something. Three months, I can see. That is
a lifetime in radio these days. Everything was supposed to be successfulllll yesterday, remember?
Uriah said:The three-year perspective is a long-term brand strength view. For radio stations it's when you feel the booster rockets kicking in as you pass your competition - like Bert passing Star in Star's key demos. That didn't happen in 3 months. It’s when you finally get first share of local and national buys and are poised to serve a generation of listeners.
TRG and S&V are encore performances. Starting from scratch with TMM is a completely different branding effort.
Check Tom Taylor's Daily sheet today for updated streaming #’s. We’ve now reached critical mass with college grads and their use of web streams over tuners – and how long have we been streaming? Those billion tuners we bragged about when the i-Pod debuted are now being stacked in a landfill with Laser Disc players. Next up: Microsoft’s Sync puts hard drives in cars. Mobile web will happen. Thankfully local radio is still strong in-car. Could this make HD and Satellite radio short-term bridge technologies?
Logic tells us that our industry will continue to contract IF we keep depending on just FM and AM frequencies as our only distribution channels for consumer content and advertising messages for our clients. There is evidence that radio is evolving successfully. See NPR Podcast rankings for some good news. Radio is still the best at local, relevant content distribution.
Irrational thinking would be to consider that Star can go from 30m to 15m over 4 years, drop S&V, add TMM, then return to 30 mill in 3 months.