Which means Rick "retained" the audience that Jhani had before he left.
Maybe.
Which means Rick "retained" the audience that Jhani had before he left.
Which means Rick "retained" the audience that Jhani had before he left.
If done right, anything is possible.
CBS FM seems to be taking a different approach - a long playlist, specialty programming and the occasional "oh wow", forgotten record mixed in between. And certainly no where near the repetition heard on KRTH. They're doing this with incredible numbers as their ratings have skyrocketed. It appears both philosophies may work. The lengthy playlist isn't dead. It seems that it's the individual programmers decision and not just the audience.
Obviously KRTH is run by research groups who don't know what classic hits are. "Oh wow" hits should be required at all oldies stations!
What we know is that those supposed "Oh, wow" songs are simply songs that did not have enough positive acceptance to be in the regular programming. So when they play, we see the MScores showing how significant numbers of listeners have left the station each time one is played.
What we know is that those supposed "Oh, wow" songs are simply songs that did not have enough positive acceptance to be in the regular programming. So when they play, we see the MScores showing how significant numbers of listeners have left the station each time one is played.
Obviously KRTH is run by research groups who don't know what classic hits are. "Oh wow" hits should be required at all oldies stations!
-crainbebo
So then, how come some successful stations play the "oh wow's" and some don't? Surely, CBS-FM does not want to lose listeners any more than K-Earth does. Why does CBS-FM feel they can take more risks than K-Earth? I have no axe to grind for long or short libraries; I just find this debate very interesting.
There's no exact concrete evidence on how many actual listeners will press the button if an "Oh Wow" lost hit comes on. In fact, many will stay tuned in, because it's an "Oh Wow". Many other listeners also switch stations when a familiar song comes on for the 27th time in 3 months. It works both ways. And that's why CBS-FM and WOGL will remain successful.
What's your "concrete evidence" that they'll stay tuned in, other than your own personal preference?
PPM shows programmers exact minute-by-minute listening. Put that next to the playlist, and you know what song was playing when someone changed the station. See it enough times, and you have concrete evidence.
And out of all the possible listeners to one particular station (KRTH for example), how many listeners (in car, at home, in the office) actually have this PPM device to measure their activity on any given day.
And out of all the possible listeners to one particular station (KRTH for example), how many listeners (in car, at home, in the office) actually have this PPM device to measure their activity on any given day.
There's no exact concrete evidence on how many actual listeners will press the button if an "Oh Wow" lost hit comes on. .
So then, how come some successful stations play the "oh wow's" and some don't? Surely, CBS-FM does not want to lose listeners any more than K-Earth does. Why does CBS-FM feel they can take more risks than K-Earth? I have no axe to grind for long or short libraries; I just find this debate very interesting.
As much as I appreciate the responses thus far, I don't know that either of the questions I posed were completely answered. Perhaps if I rephrase them, someone can talk to why CBS FMs longer playlist seems to be contributing to their enormous ratings surge, while the professionals here have been advocating shorter lists as the industry trend.
Is the assumption that CBS FM is an aberration based on the new York city market? *Or simply with their target audience a higher number of records test better?
Hypothetically, following industry trends, why wouldn't *CBS copy KRTHS example and further narrow their list, refine it to where only the very best of the best are played.
My point was that CBS is willing to run the risk of mixing these songs in occasionally while other stations won't. It doesn't appear these seldom played songs are adversely affecting their ratings in the least.
And I'm still curious as to why Rick Thomas's programming tenure at KRTH was professionally lauded while jay Coffey was ridiculed 10 years earlier for essentially sharing the same philosophy - Just with different songs. Just asking.