I misspoke when I used the term "cost-effective" as Planet reduces commercial load to counter new competition. This is and can be very expensive negatively affecting revenue and not just for them. Out of curiosity I checked Planet out yesterday afternoon. The well-intentioned jock, almost with a sound of desperation in his voice, made this "deal" with the listeners saying something like "O.K. Here's the deal. We've got two and a half minutes of commercials and we'll follow that up with two and a half hours of music, Deal?" I was floored. It's to a point that we are practically begging listeners to listen to spots and the station. When does all this end?
Look, I realize I'm an outsider and often get the feeling I'm crashing some exclusive club here. But I've always tried to apply good business practices I enjoyed in the "real world" to the business of radio. I don't know of all the research and cost-analysis that goes into making the decision to go head-on with a competitor but this much I do know. Planet must have been regarded as vulnerable and therefore opportunity arose for someone else.
How many times have I and others posted messages about not taking listeners for granted, not going through the motions, keep your listeners in the center, be innovative and creative and above all - listen to what your audience is telling you. Folks, even in the diary, there's a place people can leave comments. A reasonable person has to wonder just how much of this mess Planet has brought on themselves. I wish our market could be more receptive to listening more. Just because you are in the business doesn't mean your decisions are always correct. Look at your results in the long haul.
Across town, I'm sure there were lots of high- fives and congratulatory rhetoric at the company holiday party for a job well done. But before that is allowed to go to your head, continue to remember that in among the best signals in town, true potential was never realized. For years, that station withered away. It was making some money and it had decent demos and cume so it served a useful purpose. Making it better and exciting and even more competitive among adult listeners would have involved work and effort. Who can bother with that? If one considers the potential revenue that was lost over the years on such a great signal, one has to wonder. Why bother, so let's engage in a peeing contest instead bringing more of the same to the market.
When this market obsesses with a format leader, they flip a station in their cluster to the format so it's 2 against 1. I say flip Eagle now to Adult Alternative. After all, where can they go musically into the 90's? I wouldn't think they will be playing Janet Jackson, Paula Abdul or Michael Bolton or Gloria Estefan anytime soon. It's either that, rap or alternative, so take your pick.
I suppose the thinking with less commercials is if ratings get stronger, the billing rate will increase enough to offset. Keep dreaming, but why do I keep thinking the solution will be to fire more people. And this is considered good business biting the hand that feeds you.