• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The New Season: 'Last Resort'

This new ABC offering is about a U.S. ballistic missile submarine (USS Colorado) that receives apparently erroneous orders to fire missiles at Pakistan. The captain refuses to fire at which time a missile is launched from friendly forces at the submarine. The submarine then escapes to an island occupied by a drug lord and a NATO radar station. If that premise sounds a bit far-fetched, like they say, you ain't seen nothing yet.

The submarine crew is a typical Hollyweird cast - gruff captain, weak-kneed executive officer, rebellious senior enlisted man (here called "Chief of the Boat"), a couple of junior female officers whose only purpose seems to provide T&A and a dozen or so expendable general purpose sailors whose one-liners in the script will allow them to pay the rent this month. Did I mention that one female officer happens to be the daughter of "the admiral"? The writers didn't miss a thing!

The SFX in the one hour premiere were good despite things like radar screens, missile tracks and bomber representations are Flash Gordonish. And I know Boomers are a lot more spacious than attack subs but this one seems like the three-bedroom condo of the class. The passageways however are narrow enough to ensure significant chest-rubbing when sailors, especially of the female class, pass each other accompanied by snarky remarks that would get actual crews deep-sixed off the boat.

In addition to the crew there is another gaggle of military brass (the aforementioned "admiral"), a twenty-something hotbody who is laughingly portrayed as the CEO of a major defense contractor and a variety of unnamed, as yet, sinister blackcoat government types one of which we can assume is the Dastardly Snively Whiplash out to foment tension between the U.S. and Pakistan (as if anything more need be done). This is a very high level look at foreign intrigue through the eyes of a fifth-grader.

On the island we have an yet-unnamed drug dealer (although it is not explained where his drugs come from or who he sells them to but he does speak perfect English). He may turn out to be a good guy in disguise because in the first episode he is faced down by a drunk American with a pistol despite his five gooney bodyguards. We also have a 'NATO' radar station (there is no such thing) manned by the typical geek with coke bottle glasses and his fetching hotbody assistant. Fortunately for the sailors on this good ship Fiasco there is a bar and the barmaid is a fetching Oriental of unnamed extraction (I vote for Korean). You can already tell she has a heart of gold.

It must be hell to be an actor and to have signed up for this ridiculous spurge.

There are literally too many falsehoods in this one hour to list but the main one, and the one that supersedes all others are the actions of the captain and crew, particularly the Chief of the Boat. There would never, ever be questions directed at the captain as he was carrying out orders. And a captain would never, ever ignore or question his orders.

Submarine crews, especially those on Boomers (ballistic missile carrying subs) are among the most rigorously selected and examined people in the military. To show the crew in this manner is demeaning to real crews and the Navy at large.

This show depicts the U.S. Navy's submarine service as accurately as Star Trek depicted space travel. The only thing missing was the giant green hand and a couple dozen Tribbles.

It isn't even good science fiction or plain old drama. Just junk. Some of the reviews have compared it to "Lost" (a previous failing effort by ABC) and I would say that it is just as ridiculous and even more technically incompetent.

If you would like to examine this stinking piece of crap fine theatrical effort for yourself you can find the premiere here: http://collider.com/last-resort-pilot/194605/
 
fortt3 said:
landtuna said:
"Lost" (a previous failing effort by ABC)

Um, what?
"A critically acclaimed and popular success, Lost was consistently ranked by critics on their lists of top ten series of all time." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_(TV_series)

Yes - and Lost ran 6 seasons - hardly a definition of failure. Far fetched? Sure - but you can do that when the premise is other-wordly and allows for life after death. It's a bit different with a show like Last Resort, which needs to be grounded in reality.

But the worst are still cop shows. If any real cop had to endure a weekly life and death situation with a shoot-out and car chase, they would be blitering idiots with PTSD and on permanent disability. But 90 % of police work is routine and boring, and who would want to watch that?
 
fortt3 said:
landtuna said:
"Lost" (a previous failing effort by ABC)

Um, what?
"A critically acclaimed and popular success, Lost was consistently ranked by critics on their lists of top ten series of all time." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_(TV_series)

Everyone can have an opinion on Wikipedia.

If you read the complete writing of those same 'critics' you'll notice that by the third season some were savaging it quite severely. It did get initial kudos but those faded fairly quickly and most critics acknowledged its following was close to cult.

As for me, it was crossed off my "must see" list by episode 3. Simply too far out fantastic to believe, not to mention becoming a boring drama with "bad spirits" in the bushes.
 
Lkeller said:
But 90 % of police work is routine and boring, and who would want to watch that?

"COPS" has/had a pretty good following despite showing the flotsam and jetsam of Americana every show.
 
I posted a critical opinion of this show on IMDB and am getting predictable responses. Most are apparently from jacked-up young males who apparently believe all or part of this fantasy.

I understand the U.S. Navy refused to participate in this show. Now we know why.
 
Never saw "Last Resort," but from your analysis, it sounds like "McHale's Navy" had more realistic sailors and "Seaquest DSV" had more believable submarine action.

I remember a series called "Supercarrier," obviously meant to cash in on the success of "Top Gun." To borrow an MST3K quip, "Stock footage? More like stock mileage."
 
landtuna said:
fortt3 said:
landtuna said:
"Lost" (a previous failing effort by ABC)

Um, what?
"A critically acclaimed and popular success, Lost was consistently ranked by critics on their lists of top ten series of all time." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_(TV_series)

Everyone can have an opinion on Wikipedia.

True, but only you can call a show that lasted six seasons and inspired several formulaic copycats (even from its own network) a failure.

landtuna said:
I posted a critical opinion of this show on IMDB and am getting predictable responses. Most are apparently from jacked-up young males who apparently believe all or part of this fantasy.
I'm so sorry nobody consults you first in such important matters. ::)
 
Thanks for the review, landtuna. I was thinking of checking this show out but after reading what you've written I think I'll just look for some episodes of Operation Petticoat on You Tube instead!
 
rnigma said:
Never saw "Last Resort," but from your analysis, it sounds like "McHale's Navy" had more realistic sailors and "Seaquest DSV" had more believable submarine action.

I was a big fan of "McHale's Navy" mostly because of the actors themselves. It was an out-and-out parody of the navy and I doubt there was a single person of any age who would have confused it with any form of reality. The casting of that show, top to bottom, was unique and first rate.

"Last Resort" is billed as a drama (political/military/who knows what else) and as such it should be held to a different standard of realism. I think it failed. Other reviewers do not. My main point in posting was to give my point of view and let others decide after they viewed the premiere. I compared it to Star Trek only because I think that show was the all-time silliest depiction of science fiction I ever saw on TV perhaps with the single exception of "Lost in Space".
 
Nate Wesley said:
landtuna said:
fortt3 said:
landtuna said:
"Lost" (a previous failing effort by ABC)

Um, what?
"A critically acclaimed and popular success, Lost was consistently ranked by critics on their lists of top ten series of all time." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_(TV_series)

Everyone can have an opinion on Wikipedia.

True, but only you can call a show that lasted six seasons and inspired several formulaic copycats (even from its own network) a failure.

landtuna said:
I posted a critical opinion of this show on IMDB and am getting predictable responses. Most are apparently from jacked-up young males who apparently believe all or part of this fantasy.
I'm so sorry nobody consults you first in such important matters. ::)

As I said before, a serious drama, as I understand "Last Resort" to be should be held to a higher standard of reality than this show produced in its premiere episode. Also lacking, apparently in the haste to get the story underway, was any description of the characters - such as they are.

Perhaps because I am a Navy veteran I have problems with writers and producers that put junk like this on the air. To me, this show is as relative to the Navy as "24" was to the FBI and Star Trek to NASA. At least the producers of those two shows didn't try to portray them as real.

As far as "Lost" is concerned.....I thought it had the perfect title.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom