• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The NFL Should Be Glad About One Thing......

J

Joseph_Gallant

Guest
...and it is this: The NFL's post-season TV ratings, unique among the "big four" professional team sports, are relatively steady year after year regardless of the market size of participating teams.

NFL teams in the number one (New York Giants), three (Chicago Bears), five (New England Patriots) and eight (Washington Redskins) television markets are now out of the playoffs.

By contrast, teams in the number thirteen (Seattle Seahawks), eighteen (Denver Broncos), twenty-two (Pittsburgh Steelers), and twenty-seven (Carolina Panthers; Charlotte) markets are still alive for a Super Bowl berth.

If this had not been the NFL, there would be tremendous worries on Network Row for ratings for the rest of the postseason would have been way down with big-market teams having been eliminated.

I'm sure the NFL and ABC (which will televise Super Bowl XL) would have preferred New England being in the Super Bowl, for it might have become the highest-rated single-network television program ever (due to the fact that New England would have been going for an unprecedented three-peat, which might have drawn in a record audience).

Well, Pittsburgh was a powerful team in the 1970's (and occassionally since), and ABC could hype the Steelers as wanting to emulate the great teams of the past. Seattle would be a first-time Super Bowl entrant and could be hyped as a one-time "hard luck" franchise finally qualifying for the world's biggest annual sporting event. Denver could be promoted as "Could the post-(John)Elway Broncos win the big one??". Carolina could be hyped as the team who a few years ago came just short of winning a Super Bowl and now wants to break through and win a championship.

Had Major League Baseball, the NHL or the NBA been stuck with it's remaining four teams being in smaller-markets, this would have been a recipe for low ratings for the championship rounds. But CBS (for the AFC Championship), Fox (for the NFC Championship), and ABC (for Super Bowl XL, which will be the network's final NFL game after having covered the league for the past 36 seasons) should see the very strong ratings that the conference championship and Super Bowl games normally get. Super Bowl XL should still be the year's most watched television event.
 
> ...and it is this: The NFL's post-season TV ratings, unique
> among the "big four" professional team sports, are
> relatively steady year after year regardless of the market
> size of participating teams.
>
> NFL teams in the number one (New York Giants), three
> (Chicago Bears), five (New England Patriots) and eight
> (Washington Redskins) television markets are now out of the
> playoffs.
>
> By contrast, teams in the number thirteen (Seattle
> Seahawks), eighteen (Denver Broncos), twenty-two (Pittsburgh
> Steelers), and twenty-seven (Carolina Panthers; Charlotte)
> markets are still alive for a Super Bowl berth.
>
> If this had not been the NFL, there would be tremendous
> worries on Network Row for ratings for the rest of the
> postseason would have been way down with big-market teams
> having been eliminated.
>
> I'm sure the NFL and ABC (which will televise Super Bowl XL)
> would have preferred New England being in the Super Bowl,
> for it might have become the highest-rated single-network
> television program ever (due to the fact that New England
> would have been going for an unprecedented three-peat, which
> might have drawn in a record audience).
>
> Well, Pittsburgh was a powerful team in the 1970's (and
> occassionally since), and ABC could hype the Steelers as
> wanting to emulate the great teams of the past. Seattle
> would be a first-time Super Bowl entrant and could be hyped
> as a one-time "hard luck" franchise finally qualifying for
> the world's biggest annual sporting event. Denver could be
> promoted as "Could the post-(John)Elway Broncos win the big
> one??". Carolina could be hyped as the team who a few years
> ago came just short of winning a Super Bowl and now wants to
> break through and win a championship.
>
> Had Major League Baseball, the NHL or the NBA been stuck
> with it's remaining four teams being in smaller-markets,
> this would have been a recipe for low ratings for the
> championship rounds. But CBS (for the AFC Championship), Fox
> (for the NFC Championship), and ABC (for Super Bowl XL,
> which will be the network's final NFL game after having
> covered the league for the past 36 seasons) should see the
> very strong ratings that the conference championship and
> Super Bowl games normally get. Super Bowl XL should still be
> the year's most watched television event.
<font color=green> As they say in organized crime 'football is the greatest gambling vehicle ever devised'. As long as there is intense betting interest, there will always be a large audience. </font>
 
GO SEATTLE! On the road to Detroit! :)<P ID="signature">______________
#13 Dan Marino...2005 Football Hall Of Fame Inductee :)</P>
 
I'll second the last post...

> GO SEATTLE! On the road to Detroit! :)

And now that Indianapolis is gone and Carolina is our foe, it could be the Vince Lombardi is heading for the Jet City.

(...and if you don't think I'm nervous...So close, and yet...)
 
> As they say in organized crime 'football is the greatest
> gambling vehicle ever devised'. As long as there is intense
> betting interest, there will always be a large audience.
>
I'm shocked, shocked to find that people are gambling on football games!
 
Hi everyone:

> I'll second the last post...
>
> > GO SEATTLE! On the road to Detroit! :)
>
> And now that Indianapolis is gone and Carolina is our foe,
> it could be the Vince Lombardi is heading for the Jet City.
>
> (...and if you don't think I'm nervous...So close, and
> yet...)

Err...You seemed to have forgotten something.

YOU STILL HAVE TO GET PAST DENVER (who WILL beat Pittsburgh in the AFC Championship) in order to get "The Vince". :)

Just figured I'd point out that small formality :D

Cheers for now :)
<P ID="signature">______________
patspodcast03a.jpg

http://patspodcast.blogspot.com/
Radio? Uhh.....What's THAT?? :)</P>
 
What about Raleigh/Durham?

> ...and it is this: The NFL's post-season TV ratings, unique
> among the "big four" professional team sports, are
> relatively steady year after year regardless of the market
> size of participating teams.
>
> NFL teams in the number one (New York Giants), three
> (Chicago Bears), five (New England Patriots) and eight
> (Washington Redskins) television markets are now out of the
> playoffs.
>
> By contrast, teams in the number thirteen (Seattle
> Seahawks), eighteen (Denver Broncos), twenty-two (Pittsburgh
> Steelers), and twenty-seven (Carolina Panthers; Charlotte)
> markets are still alive for a Super Bowl berth.
>
> Had Major League Baseball, the NHL or the NBA been stuck
> with it's remaining four teams being in smaller-markets,
> this would have been a recipe for low ratings for the
> championship rounds.

The NFL's and NBA's Carolina teams are in Charlotte. The NHL's is 150 miles away in Raleigh. What's the RDU market's ranking?

ixnay
 
Re: What about Raleigh/Durham?

The Raleigh-Durham-Fayetteville TV market is #29.
>
> The NFL's and NBA's Carolina teams are in Charlotte. The
> NHL's is 150 miles away in Raleigh. What's the RDU market's
> ranking?
>
> ixnay
>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom