• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

The RCA BTS 1A

This was the first stereo MPX unit to come around as shown here...
http://fmamradios.com/BTS-1A.html

I have been interested in designing an all transistor version of this unit. Replace the transformers in the circuit with transistor stages to flip phase and so on.

The thing I see with this original stereo unit should be obvious. That is we are talking pure transistors, no opamps like todays MPX units.

I'd imagine using all transistors, and phased transistor circuits to replace the audio transformers in the original circuit would only lead to increased fidelity.

The issue I have with todays MPX encoders is that they are mostly based on noisy opamp circuits. There is unnecessary circuity inherent in opamps that cause noise.

I honestly believe a trip back to the past to see how things were done would make for a better future in stereo separation and noise, lack of pilot interference, and characteristics that aren't effected by audio 1harmonics because of inter-stage circuits to reduce that.

Almost all the MPX circuits I see today are based on noise producing circuits. Ways to cut corners to simplify circuits, when in reality the transistor equivalent wouldn't probably just work as good, but rival said IC circuits, and even be simpler?

A great example is the Part 15 unlicensed transmitters using BA1404 cloned chips. They all operate on the same principals that I can tell. Switch the 38kHz to produce DSB and mix it with halved 38kHz frequency to achieve 19kHz pilot, then take both and mix to a MPX signal to run into a mono transmitter.

Keep in mind the first MPX unit was shown above, using nothing more than two tubes. Today we have MPX circuits using a dozen chips at least.

Ah who am I kidding, no one cares about audio quality anymore anyways.
 
I'd really love to know if any of you have been around to experience the quality of the RCA BTS-1A.
Being as it was first and all, I'd love to know how you thought it sounded.
My guess is that it rocked considering how simple it was designed and built to achieve specifications.
 
I have had experience with this unit. Also with the GEL, Gates and Collins tube-type stereo generators.
Their performance was not good. They did not have good stereo separation. They were noisy.
The biggest problem was that they needed frequent adjustment to maintain stereo separation.

There is a reason why the industry migrated to the 'switching' method of producing a multiplex stereo signal.
The performance is better and it doesn't require so much adjustment.

Sometimes the past is best left in the past.
 
Kage Michaels said:
Ah who am I kidding, no one cares about audio quality anymore anyways.
What about Breakaway with the processing bypassed? Doesn't that take care of all of the above? Especially when hooked up to a REAL digital Exciter?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom